stupidQuite the busy little Russia bot, aren't you? Crowdstrike reportedly shared all they had with the FBI. And no, the claim that Russia interfered with the U.S. election isn't (solely) dependent on whether Russia hacked the DNC servers, your wild-eyed proclamations to the contrary notwithstanding. And no, the CIA and the NSA didn't merely go along for the ride.
Of course, there are good reasons for the FBI not to do independent forensics, ranging from not wasting public funds to do duplicate work, to the privacy rights even the DNC enjoys, even though your authoritarian leanings would love to see such rights to go away, and the government to have access to whatever they want to scrutinize.
Why don't you just waddle off, bot?
you are worried about paying for forensics when the entire sanctions regime is based on this?
Clappers assessment was thin enough on facts to not have a baseline FBI analysis.
Crowdstrikes assessment was suspect when examined-and they have been shown to be wrong before.
Yes this 1 day assessment is supposed to be unquestionable accepted as gospel?
Whatever happened to Nati0nal security a as reason to demand the server
the CIA and the NSA added their own assessment? ( we don't know because it's classified)
all we have is baselined on Crowdstrike
It's an accepted narrative that was never questioned because it fits right in with Deep States predetermined positions on Russia (existential threat/can/t be dealt with -only contained)
There is no valid reason not to do a first hand analysis; especially since Alperovitch is a Nonresident Senior Fellow of the Atlantic Council (conflict of motivations)
