Wasserman Schultz

Quite the busy little Russia bot, aren't you? Crowdstrike reportedly shared all they had with the FBI. And no, the claim that Russia interfered with the U.S. election isn't (solely) dependent on whether Russia hacked the DNC servers, your wild-eyed proclamations to the contrary notwithstanding. And no, the CIA and the NSA didn't merely go along for the ride.

Of course, there are good reasons for the FBI not to do independent forensics, ranging from not wasting public funds to do duplicate work, to the privacy rights even the DNC enjoys, even though your authoritarian leanings would love to see such rights to go away, and the government to have access to whatever they want to scrutinize.

Why don't you just waddle off, bot?
stupid
you are worried about paying for forensics when the entire sanctions regime is based on this?

Clappers assessment was thin enough on facts to not have a baseline FBI analysis.

Crowdstrikes assessment was suspect when examined-and they have been shown to be wrong before.
Yes this 1 day assessment is supposed to be unquestionable accepted as gospel?
Whatever happened to Nati0nal security a as reason to demand the server

the CIA and the NSA added their own assessment? ( we don't know because it's classified)
all we have is baselined on Crowdstrike

It's an accepted narrative that was never questioned because it fits right in with Deep States predetermined positions on Russia (existential threat/can/t be dealt with -only contained)

There is no valid reason not to do a first hand analysis; especially since Alperovitch is a Nonresident Senior Fellow of the Atlantic Council (conflict of motivations)
 
you are intelligent. I shouldn't have to spoon feed you conclusions.

I've given you plenty of evidence of doubt. Only the FBI does the forensics that the assessment is based on -and they didn't even do tht.
The CIA and the NSA basically went along for the ride.

do you want my assessment?
start here
Then don't bother to spoon feed me...I'll go back to ignoring you.
 
Trump is President. And you find it strange that Wasserman Schultz doesn't get as much coverage?

Isn't odd that you cry and whine that Trump is trying to be a dictator yet here you are exalting him above what the Constitution intended.

You seem to be implying that you only care about things pertaining to the Presidency and anyone else can do what they want.

I suspect if Debbie had an R after her name you wouldn't be as accommodating.
 
i look forward to the result of the mueller investigation and seeing trump and associates cleared completely. Nothing will be found as it is all deep state lies.

They may. It find an actual crime with regards to collusion, but rest assured Mueller will find some "process crime" like they did with Scooter Libby. Rem meet it was Armitage that outed Plame.

There is no way Mueller closes up shop with nothing. Now will it be what the democrats have accused Trump of? No. But they will get something.

This whole thing is a miscarriage of justice. There is no underlying crime therefore a special prosecutor is not even warranted.

Comey breaks the law and nothing.
Hillary breaks the law and nothing
Lynch breaks the law and nothing
Obama breaks the law and nothing

Trump waves hi to a Russian and we have high crimes and misdemeanors

We are heading toward civil war. I am quite looking forward to it.
 
So, why would three agencies lie? You still haven't answered my questions.

remember when it was 17 agencies? Those were the days....

Why would they lie Rana? I don't know. Why would our 3 letter agencies lie about weapons of mass destruction? why did they lie about the gulf of tolkien? Why did the lie when they said they weren't spying on americans? They fucking lie. that's what they do.
 
They may. It find an actual crime with regards to collusion, but rest assured Mueller will find some "process crime" like they did with Scooter Libby. Rem meet it was Armitage that outed Plame.

There is no way Mueller closes up shop with nothing. Now will it be what the democrats have accused Trump of? No. But they will get something.

This whole thing is a miscarriage of justice. There is no underlying crime therefore a special prosecutor is not even warranted.

Comey breaks the law and nothing.
Hillary breaks the law and nothing
Lynch breaks the law and nothing
Obama breaks the law and nothing

Trump waves hi to a Russian and we have high crimes and misdemeanors

We are heading toward civil war. I am quite looking forward to it.

I have a high degree of confidence nothing will come out at all. For 6 months there have been leaks every which way about trump doing x y z. If there was anything substantial, it would have leaked already. I do agree they might try to muster some bullshit allegation for some rando low level dude to save face, but that's the best democrats will get. If at all.
 
remember when it was 17 agencies? Those were the days....

Why would they lie Rana? I don't know. Why would our 3 letter agencies lie about weapons of mass destruction? why did they lie about the gulf of tolkien? Why did the lie when they said they weren't spying on americans? They fucking lie. that's what they do.

Since they lied about the 17 agencies their credibility on this particular issue is pretty much shot.
 
Crowdstrike founder Alperovitch is a Nonresident Senior Fellow of the Atlantic Council, and head honcho of its “Cyber Statecraft Initiative” – of which his role in promoting the “Putin did it” scenario is a Exhibit A. James Carden, writing in The Nation, makes the trenchant point that

“The connection between Alperovitch and the Atlantic Council has gone largely unremarked upon, but it is relevant given that the Atlantic Council – which is funded in part by the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk – has been among the loudest voices calling for a new Cold War with Russia.”

Adam Johnson, writing on the FAIR blog, adds to our knowledge by noting that the Council’s budget is also supplemented by “a consortium of Western corporations (Qualcomm, Coca-Cola, The Blackstone Group), including weapons manufacturers (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman) and oil companies (ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP).”

Johnson also notes that CrowdStrike currently has a $150,000 / year, no-bid contract with the FBI for “systems analysis.”
Nice work if you can get it.

This last little tidbit gives us some insight into what is perhaps the most curious aspect of the Russian-hackers-campaign-for-Trump story: the FBI’s complete dependence on Crowdstrike’s analysis. Amazingly, the FBI did no independent forensic work on the DNC servers before Crowdstrike got its hot little hands on them: indeed, the DNC denied the FBI access to the servers, and, as far as anyone knows, the FBI never examined them. BuzzFeed quotes an anonymous “intelligence official” as saying “Crowdstrike is pretty good. There’s no reason to believe that anything they have concluded is not accurate.”
There is now.
Alperovitch is scheduled to testify before the House Intelligence Committee, and one wonders if our clueless – and technically challenged – Republican members of Congress will question him about the debunking of Crowdstrike’s rush to judgment. I tend to doubt it, since the Russia-did-it meme is now the Accepted Narrative and no dissent is permitted – to challenge it would make them “Putin apologists”! (Although maybe Trey Gowdy, the only GOPer on that panel who seems to have any brains, may surprise me.)
As I’ve been saying for months, there is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC: none, zilch, nada. Yet this false narrative is the entire basis of a campaign launched by the Democrats, hailed by the Trump-hating media, and fully endorsed by the FBI and the CIA, the purpose of which is to “prove” that Trump is “Putin’s puppet,” as Hillary Clinton put it. Now the investigative powers of the federal government are being deployed to confirm that the Trump campaign “colluded” with the Kremlin in an act the evidence for which is collapsing.
This whole affair is a vicious fraud. If there is any justice in this world – and there may not be – the perpetrators should be charged, tried, and jailed.
I am curious to know how the DNC can stop the Feds from examining their server?
 
remember when it was 17 agencies? Those were the days....

Why would they lie Rana? I don't know. Why would our 3 letter agencies lie about weapons of mass destruction? why did they lie about the gulf of tolkien? Why did the lie when they said they weren't spying on americans? They fucking lie. that's what they do.
The 17 agencies still agree on the intel.
Our intelligence agencies didn't lie, the information was cherry picked by the government, our governments lied to us. Also, these aren't government agencies who looked over the copies of the servers of the DNC, they are private companies.
 
stupid
you are worried about paying for forensics when the entire sanctions regime is based on this?

Clappers assessment was thin enough on facts to not have a baseline FBI analysis.

Crowdstrikes assessment was suspect when examined-and they have been shown to be wrong before.
Yes this 1 day assessment is supposed to be unquestionable accepted as gospel?
Whatever happened to Nati0nal security a as reason to demand the server

the CIA and the NSA added their own assessment? ( we don't know because it's classified)
all we have is baselined on Crowdstrike

It's an accepted narrative that was never questioned because it fits right in with Deep States predetermined positions on Russia (existential threat/can/t be dealt with -only contained)

There is no valid reason not to do a first hand analysis; especially since Alperovitch is a Nonresident Senior Fellow of the Atlantic Council (conflict of motivations)
I am damn sure that the NSA/FBI could get into that server easily enough if they wanted to, why they would need anybody else is beyond me..
 
The 17 agencies still agree on the intel.
Our intelligence agencies didn't lie, the information was cherry picked by the government, our governments lied to us. Also, these aren't government agencies who looked over the copies of the servers of the DNC, they are private companies.

Not sure why the bolded is above Grind's head.

No one every accused the intel agencies of "lying." It's the way the Bush admin manipulated and cherrypicked the intel - it was being "fixed around the policy." Pretty basic stuff.
 
I have a high degree of confidence nothing will come out at all. For 6 months there have been leaks every which way about trump doing x y z. If there was anything substantial, it would have leaked already. I do agree they might try to muster some bullshit allegation for some rando low level dude to save face, but that's the best democrats will get. If at all.
You've said this before and as I told you before, Mueller's operation is 1st rate, no leaks because they respect their boss and the job they are doing.
He just hired another prosecutor, former DoJ frauds and foreign bribery.
 
it doesn't have to leak from muellers team. it could leak from any participant in any potential shenanigans. but nothing.
 
remember when it was 17 agencies? Those were the days....

Why would they lie Rana? I don't know. Why would our 3 letter agencies lie about weapons of mass destruction? why did they lie about the gulf of tolkien? Why did the lie when they said they weren't spying on americans? They fucking lie. that's what they do.
The Gulf of Tolkien, that's just classic, did Tom Bombadil tell you that? By the way I've been to the Gulf of Tonkin!
 
Back
Top