washington state referendum 71 passes

Massachusetts passes a law creating civil unions....gays sue demanding marriage, law overturned......California passes law creating domestic partnerships.....gays sue demanding marriage, law overturned......Washington will be next.....the world is not safe until we all accept liberal's morals.....

quite the contrary....it is YOU who argues that marriage is not safe unless people accept your demands that gay marriage be outlawed.

no one who advocates gay marriage makes the argument that the world will be safe because gay marriage is allowed, it is in fact folks like you who argue allowing gay marriage will make us unsafe unless we accept your morals....
 
quite the contrary....it is YOU who argues that marriage is not safe unless people accept your demands that gay marriage be outlawed.

no one who advocates gay marriage makes the argument that the world will be safe because gay marriage is allowed, it is in fact folks like you who argue allowing gay marriage will make us unsafe unless we accept your morals....

keep your morals in your shorts and out of the courts....
 
keep your morals in your shorts and out of the courts....

hypocrite...it is you forcing your morals on people....not the other way around...

gay marriage wouldn't change your life or marriage, but you are changing their lives and forcing them to not enjoy the full benefits of marriage, which in this country is not a religious or moral institution.

those are the facts. and it is why you ignored the last part of my post, because you know you can't rationally counter it.
 
i've never really understood why you make this argument....as if not allowing gay marriage will or has stopped homosexuals from having sex...

as your study pointed out....they allegedly will take up to 8 partners during the year....

thus, gay marriage advocates do not enable anything of the sort, nice try

next
I don't care that queers bone each other; what two consenting adults do behind closed doors is of no consequence to anyone other then themselves.
 
i've never really understood why you make this argument....as if not allowing gay marriage will or has stopped homosexuals from having sex...

as your study pointed out....they allegedly will take up to 8 partners during the year....

thus, gay marriage advocates do not enable anything of the sort, nice try

next

You know what I've never understood about this issue? This:

Really? You people don't have bigger things to worry about? Your shit is so sweet and worries so few that you can take the time to concern yourselves with the actions and relationships of others? It's not on the top of my list of issues I support, in fact it's nowhere near my list. I just don't get what is the big deal.

On the other hand, I say similar things when Gay advocates are unwilling to accept civil unions if said unions offer the same benefits of marriage.

Maybe it's a religion thing, I don't know.

No matter how you slice, however, I can't help but think there are bigger issues facing this nation than this one.
 
You know what I've never understood about this issue? This:

Really? You people don't have bigger things to worry about? Your shit is so sweet and worries so few that you can take the time to concern yourselves with the actions and relationships of others? It's not on the top of my list of issues I support, in fact it's nowhere near my list. I just don't get what is the big deal.

On the other hand, I say similar things when Gay advocates are unwilling to accept civil unions if said unions offer the same benefits of marriage.

Maybe it's a religion thing, I don't know.

No matter how you slice, however, I can't help but think there are bigger issues facing this nation than this one.

according to dixie, SM, PMP.....allowing gay marriage will bring about the fall of our country.....
 
according to dixie, SM, PMP.....allowing gay marriage will bring about the fall of our country.....

according to Yurtie and the other liberal moral hosers, forcing everyone to consider a gay relationship the equivalent of marriage isn't forcing liberal morality on everyone else....:pke:
 
according to Yurtie and the other liberal moral hosers, forcing everyone to consider a gay relationship the equivalent of marriage isn't forcing liberal morality on everyone else....:pke:

it isn't....

you demanding they accept your morality and not be allowed to marry is forcing them to accept your morality....

if they get married you don't have to accept their relationship at all....you allow murderers, adulterers, liars to get married....but not homosexuals...

hypocrite
 
Assuming that to be true, why cause more damage?

it wouldn't....

gay marriage would do nothing to your morals, my morals or anyone elses....

people get married under false pretenses, to come to this country or to get someone's wealth....i could go on but the point is hetro marriage isn't any moral than gay marriage in this country.

the governmetn needs to get out of marriage and grant civil unions to everyone and if you want to get married, that is seperate between the parties....makes perfect sense because you can't contract for illegal behavior, so only legal behavior or relationships i mean, could enter into a civil union....it wholly inequitable to grant them civil unions and not marriage, marriage according to this country, not religious marriage
 
Back
Top