Voters Being Turned Away From Polls in Florida (Evince Friendly)

K

Konono

Verified User
Voters in Apopka, Florida, were turned away from their polling place by workers who said they ran out of Republican ballots.

At two polling places where long lines were visible, voters were turned away, ClickOrlando.com is reporting. New ballots were being printed and sent to the polling places, but many voters said they had other commitments and left.

Some officials allowed voters to use the machine designed for disabled citizens, others just left.
There were other issues. Technical issues plagued several polling locations in Orange County, where officials had to use backup paper registries to enroll voters when their registration couldn’t be identified. That particular issue was a “connectivity problem” and Orange County Elections Supervisor Bill Cowles said technicians were sent there to fix the issues.

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/...achines-break-down-and-voters-are-turned-away
 
Konono said:
Evince, would you mind giving us your expert opinion on this?
Click to expand...
Allow me:
"You racist sociopaths caused this because it is the only way you can win elections, CHEAT!"
"You racist sociopaths caused this because you ignore FACTS"
"You racist sociopaths caused this because you hate the FACT that a black man is president!"
"You racist sociopaths caused this because you are racist sociopaths!"
"Your own fucks are causing the destruction of your own party because you ignore the FACT that you are ALL racist sociopaths!"
There are probably at least 25 more she could come up with, all revolving around her warped idea of what a "fact" is, and the tired old "racist sociopath" theme.
FWIW, I think a lot of dems switched parties so they could vote GOP to ensure a Trump nomination, and therefore a Trump vs. shrillary general which they think they can win because, she's clinton after all, and free stuff of course.
 
James Lee's testimony[edit]

On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[4]

Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".

"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[7]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top