Virginia Giuffre's tell all memoir to be published on Oct 21st, detailing her time with Epstein and his "many friends"

I have no Messiah. Now, you, on the other hand, need other people to do your thinking for you. You are nothing more than a mindless attack dog that HATES on command and who attacks as ordered.

Does archives want a Scooby snack? Yes, you do! Good boy!


Nope. For years, the Deep State stored the "Epstein File" hoax at the DOJ, to be trotted out if they needed such a hoax. They filled it with tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos downloaded by Jeffrey Epstein. Now that Democrats are no longer in power, they are ordering their attack dogs to demand that the "Epstein File" hoax be released to the public, knowing that it contains tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos.

Are you demanding that the "Epstein File" be released to the public?


Nope. Pam Bondi explained exactly what those tens of thousands of video files are, i.e. "child porn videos downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein."



You're gibbering. The "Epstein File" hoax is what you are promulgating.
Appears someone took it personal, and yes, he is your Messiah, if he says night is day and day is night you’d believe him

Wait a minute, so now the Democrats created the Epstein files and now they want those files exposed? That’s a new twist, so what the hell has MAGA been screaming about regarding a cover up for the last six years?

And what about Kash, Bono, Laura, MTG, and even your Messiah, who for years claimed Epstein’s records were secretly kept by the deep state and now that they are in the position to get them released aren’t doing so?

I don’t give a rat’s ass about the Epstein files, released or not released, I am just pointing out the total hypocrisy of MAGA, and enjoying you and your Messiah trying to hide it all

Bondi has already been caught in one big lie saying she had the files on her desk then that there were no files, why believe anything she says, opps, my bad, I forget, your Messiah said she doesn’t lie

Keep it up, it is humorous
 
GzIng65XEAA4n3p




She's a girl, so unlikely she spent much time with Barack Obama.

OTOH - she might have talked with the young boys - who no doubt have plenty to say about Barry..
 
President Donald Trump's name was mentioned nine times across the hundreds of pages made public earlier this year in the “phase one" release of the declassified Epstein files.
I'll give you all the information that you don't want to know:

Between 2006 and 2019, federal agencies including the DOJ and FBI accumulated extensive materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, ranging from flight logs and contact books to seized hard drives containing illicit content. While these documents were archived across multiple administrations, their public release was strategically delayed. The most sensitive component, the Epstein grand jury testimony, was sealed and repeatedly blocked from disclosure by two federal judges, one appointed by Bill Clinton and one appointed by Barack Obama. These judges conveniently framed the testimony as hearsay and inconsequential, despite its potential to expose the true scope of Epstein’s network and implicate high-profile figures, particularly elite Democrats. The suppression of this testimony created a vacuum in which fabricated documents were selectively released and framed as definitive.

In February 2025, following a shift in political power, the DOJ under Attorney General Pam Bondi released “Phase 1” of the Epstein File: roughly 200 pages including flight logs, Epstein’s black book, and an evidence list cataloging seized items. These documents mentioned Donald Trump nine times and included references to his family, while redactions and omissions shielded other politically sensitive names. The release was done in the name of transparency by the new DOJ, obviating the question as to why it only occurred after Democrats lost the presidency, and why it was never released by the Biden administration. Calls to “release the Epstein File” surged only after Trump returned to office, raising questions about whether the file had been held by Democrats as a reputational weapon. The grand jury testimony, still sealed, remains the missing keystone: its suppression signals what’s too dangerous to reveal, and its absence allows potentially fabricated or selectively curated documents to dominate the public narrative.

We can safely assume that the Federal Judges seek to protect their political patrons, i.e. Bill Clinton, Barak Obama and other top Democrats, and from that we can see that the "Epstein File" hoax becomes not a record of crimes, but a kiddie-porn booby-trapped narrative instrument, engineered to implicate others, e.g. Donald Trump, while shielding the truly guilty. The real scandal lies not in what was released, but in what remains hidden. The forensic dashboard now pivots from document analysis to strategic silence mapping, treating suppression, redaction, and timing as signals of reputational shielding and narrative inversion.
 
Release the client list and prove Trump's innocence.
Bondi has no power to release the Grand Jury testimony. You need to be demanding that Judge Richard M. Berman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1998 ... and Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, also U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, appointed by President Barack Obama in 2011, release the Grand Jury testimony that answers all of your questions ... unless that's not what you are really after.

Since those judges are specifically protecting both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama in this case, they will fall on their swords before allowing any political harm to come to either Bill or Barack. Since you only want pedophiles prosecuted if they are Donald Trump, and not if they are Democrats, you will probably not press for those judges to release the Epstein grand jury testimony that answers all of the questions you pretend to have.
 
Release the client list
What "client list"? According to Pam Bondi, the so-called "Epstein files" contain child porn videos.

I believe her when she says that. Why? Because IF the so-called "Epstein files" actually contained anything that would "implicate Trump", then the Autopen Regime would have been more than happy to release that info (and any so-called "client list") during their four years of illegitimate power.
and prove Trump's innocence.
Innocent until proven guilty, dude... not the other way around.
IF Trump is guilty of any crime, then the onus is on YOU to prove it.
 
Last edited:
Appears someone took it personal,
Appears someone cannot read.

and yes, he is your Messiah,
He is my servant. I'll be hiring Vance in just over three years time.

if he says night is day and day is night you’d believe him
Nope. I am so very glad that you do not speak for me.

Wait a minute, so now the Democrats created the Epstein files
They didn't create the "Epstein File" hoax just now. They created it well before Trump took office.

and now they want those files exposed?
Yes, Democrats created the hoax and stored it away for just such a time that they would need a hoax to get them out of a jam. There's nothing factual in the "Epstein File" except for tens of thousands of kiddie porn video files that were downloaded by Epstein. Bondi cannot and will not release that, for obvious reasons. So, of course, Democrats and other TDS-afflicted leftists demand that Bondi release the kiddie porn videos, and then complain of a "cover up" when Bondi refuses. That's what 鬼百合 is doing; read her posts.


That’s a new twist,
It's the current DNC strategy.

so what the hell has MAGA been screaming about regarding a cover up for the last six years?
Who is MAGA? What has he been screaming for the last six years?

And what about Kash, Bono, Laura, MTG, and even your Messiah, who for years claimed Epstein’s records were secretly kept by the deep state
When did Bondi ever say anything about any of this? When did Trump say anything about this?

and now that they are in the position to get them released aren’t doing so?
Between 2006 and 2019, federal agencies including the DOJ and FBI accumulated extensive materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, ranging from flight logs and contact books to seized hard drives containing illicit content. While these documents were archived across multiple administrations, their public release was strategically delayed. The most sensitive component, the Epstein grand jury testimony, was sealed and repeatedly blocked from disclosure by two federal judges, one appointed by Bill Clinton and one appointed by Barack Obama. These judges conveniently framed the testimony as hearsay and inconsequential, despite its potential to expose the true scope of Epstein’s network and implicate high-profile figures, particularly elite Democrats. The suppression of this testimony created a vacuum in which fabricated documents were selectively released and framed as definitive.

In February 2025, following a shift in political power, the DOJ under Attorney General Pam Bondi released “Phase 1” of the Epstein File: roughly 200 pages including flight logs, Epstein’s black book, and an evidence list cataloging seized items. These documents mentioned Donald Trump nine times and included references to his family, while redactions and omissions shielded other politically sensitive names. The release was done in the name of transparency by the new DOJ, obviating the question as to why it only occurred after Democrats lost the presidency, and why it was never released by the Biden administration. Calls to “release the Epstein File” surged only after Trump returned to office, raising questions about whether the file had been held by Democrats as a reputational weapon. The grand jury testimony, still sealed, remains the missing keystone: its suppression signals what’s too dangerous to reveal, and its absence allows potentially fabricated or selectively curated documents to dominate the public narrative.

We can safely assume that the Federal Judges seek to protect their political patrons, i.e. Bill Clinton, Barak Obama and other top Democrats, and from that we can see that the "Epstein File" hoax becomes not a record of crimes, but a kiddie-porn booby-trapped narrative instrument, engineered to implicate others, e.g. Donald Trump, while shielding the truly guilty. The real scandal lies not in what was released, but in what remains hidden. The forensic dashboard now pivots from document analysis to strategic silence mapping, treating suppression, redaction, and timing as signals of reputational shielding and narrative inversion.


I don’t give a rat’s ass about the Epstein files, released or not released,
Are you sure? Can I expect you to totally drop the topic of the hoax altogether?

I am just pointing out the total hypocrisy of MAGA,
What hypocrisy is there is making America great again?

and enjoying you and your Messiah trying to hide it all
... trying to hide what?

Bondi has already been caught in one big lie saying she had the files on her desk then that there were no files
Nope. Bondi explained the miscommunication. Check the video clip above.

why believe anything she says,
Bondi hasn't deceived anyone. Bondi has been a completely straight shooter who tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. She has been completely honest and up front about everything, and you would be hard pressed to support your rather stupid contention.
 
"Bondi hasn't deceived anyone. Bondi has been a completely straight shooter who tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. She has been completely honest and up front about everything, and you would be hard pressed to support your rather stupid contention."

:rofl2:
 
I still find it hilarious that you would claim that trump was not involved. The evidence is overwhelming that he was involved.

We cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was criminally involved, maybe he was just unbelievably incompetent, but he was definitely involved.

You know who was not involved? Any major Democrat.
What crime, Wally?
 
Back
Top