In her world, everyone that disagrees with her is someone that will lie to protect Trump.OK. Fair enough. Pam Bondi actually reviewed (many of) the videos and verified that they were Epstein's kiddie porn, but she could be lying, right? So, it is fair to say that it's OK to demand kiddie porn as long as one declares that one does not personally believe that it is kiddie porn, yes? I'm fine with that. Is it therefore acceptable for someone who is certain that some kiddie porn is kiddie porn, to point out that someone else is demanding kiddie porn but is simply pretending to declare that he does not believe that it is kiddie porn to avoid a 12B violation?
And no. Disbelieving someone that you believe is still not a violation of 12b.