Violent Millenial Socialist nazi pigs shut down FREE SPEECH at UC Berkley

I'm sure they were just making s'mores....
636215861515820160-AP-Breitbart-Editor-Berkeley.1.jpg

At that little "bonfire".
 
fake news is dead. I hope there will be some realistic, constitutionally binding, dutiful law enforcement when jeff sessions begins. California is a rogue state. cut off their life support and they will die.
 
Milo talks face-to-face with Tucker Carlson about the false characterization of him by the corrupt media, and the general hypocrisy of the left, which is painfully evident by anyone who isn't a blind, Liberal hack:

 
nice how you just assume things. Milo is like 30? maybe? He's also flaming gay. He makes liberals heads spin.
[FONT=&quot]The term [/FONT]Millennials is usually considered to apply to individuals who reached adulthood around the turn of the 21st century. The precise delineation varies from one source to another, however. Neil Howe and William Strauss, authors of the 1991 book Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069, are often credited with coining the term. Howe and Strauss define the Millennial cohort as consisting of individuals born between 1982 and 2004.
 
His ideas are based in racism and don't warrant a spirited rebuttal. His ideas produce the Dylan Roof types, and should not even be dignified as normal.

And everything today is not hate speech. Just because you people try to equate someone from the left as being as hateful as you all are, doesn't make it true.

You people are the problem.
I would like to see the Milo defenders comment on his work.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...be-a-cap-on-women-studying-science-and-maths/
Women drop out of science and maths in alarming numbers, not because there are sinister and mysterious patriarchal forces at play, but because they either can’t cut it in highly competitive environments or they simply change their minds about what they want from life.

Even women who graduate with good degrees in science subjects often don’t use them: they switch careers in their twenties, abandoning the hard sciences. In some cases, they simply drop out of the workforce altogether. This is a disaster for the men who missed out on places, and it’s a criminal waste of public funds.
That’s why I think there ought to be a cap on the number of women enrolling in the sciences, maths, philosophy, engineering… and perhaps medicine and the law, too. It’s hugely expensive to train a doctor, but women have something like a third of the career of a man in medicine, despite having equal access to Harvard Med. Women make up the majority of medical students.
Competition for places at the best colleges is ferocious, especially in these highly competitive subjects. As Grossman admits, women don’t cope well in competitive environments, so even if they get onto the courses, they often drop out when one day a book like this lands on their desk, or when their grades start slipping.
 
I would like to see the Milo defenders comment on his work.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...be-a-cap-on-women-studying-science-and-maths/
Women drop out of science and maths in alarming numbers, not because there are sinister and mysterious patriarchal forces at play, but because they either can’t cut it in highly competitive environments or they simply change their minds about what they want from life.

Even women who graduate with good degrees in science subjects often don’t use them: they switch careers in their twenties, abandoning the hard sciences. In some cases, they simply drop out of the workforce altogether. This is a disaster for the men who missed out on places, and it’s a criminal waste of public funds.
That’s why I think there ought to be a cap on the number of women enrolling in the sciences, maths, philosophy, engineering… and perhaps medicine and the law, too. It’s hugely expensive to train a doctor, but women have something like a third of the career of a man in medicine, despite having equal access to Harvard Med. Women make up the majority of medical students.
Competition for places at the best colleges is ferocious, especially in these highly competitive subjects. As Grossman admits, women don’t cope well in competitive environments, so even if they get onto the courses, they often drop out when one day a book like this lands on their desk, or when their grades start slipping.

Whether I agree with it is kind of not the point.

It's a college campus for crying out loud. Isn't college where you're supposed to *open your mind* to new ideas or debate the ideas you don't like.

Colleges should be the most open of all open forums---even, no especially, for ideas that run counter to dogma or conventional wisdom.

And the left wants to shut it down with riots. Why don't you defend THAT.
 
Back
Top