There are different classification for Presidential communications. This conversation may not have met standards for the server where it was hidden.
Horse shit. The POTUS is the ULTIMATE DETERMINER OF CLASSIFICATION.
Makeup some more nonsense.
There are different classification for Presidential communications. This conversation may not have met standards for the server where it was hidden.
Yes, but if he does it as a cover up, that’s another issue.Horse shit. The POTUS is the ULTIMATE DETERMINER OF CLASSIFICATION.
Makeup some more nonsense.
Don't try to put words in my mouth. Do a bio on Vindman and you will see he is a registered Democrat (no big deal) but then you find that he worked directly for Biden and as an higher ranking officer I would have expected him to remain neutral and only come forward if he had witnessed illegal activity, which has not been proven happened at this point. Thus far I have yet to see a real smoking gun. The only info we get is biased for and against. Now that this kangaroo court has been brought into the light we may finally start getting some real answers.
Vindman claims he voiced his concerns to his superiors and they did nothing. Are you suggesting these people most likely veterans also aren't honest? That is what you are saying about me.
Now I put it to you if a person running for office has committed or abetted in shall we say devious dealings and his opponent believes it may have happened isn't that person bound to bring that to light?
Owl you are wearing blinders. Look beyond MSNBC's biased reporting. It is a matter of record that Vindman worked for Biden!
They ignore the fact that it was then hidden on a server for top secret classified information. Why, if it was the best conversation, ever?
And how about Gordon Sonland, a big-time trump donor who got rewarded with an ambassadorship.
do you recall the constant leaks of POTUS phone calls ? Think maybe that's why the call notes were put on a higher classification server (no "hidden").You will *never* see a smoking gun because you don't want to, unless the barrel is pointed at someone with a (D) after their name. This decorated active military office who managed to stay at his position through changes of administrations is deeply concerned about the POTUS violating the Constitution -- and you still think he's lying because he worked with (D)s in his career. I looked up his bio and did not see anything about his political leanings. You have a credible link?
As for those he reported his alarms to -- how on earth would anyone know if they are honest, what they did about the information, and their loyalties (or not) to Trump? I suppose that will come out in the hearings. All we've heard so far as Cliff Notes synopsis of what testimony was given. We DO know, however, that enough ppl were also alarmed by the call to the point where the transcript was hidden on a secure server. Why would that happen if it's a nothingburger?
A person of integrity working for/with the govt. is honor-bound to report wrongdoing, IMO, even if the sympathize with the wrongdoer. Don't you agree? Now if you think that the POTUS, hearing a conspiracy theory about his rival(s), should be able to use the power of his elected office to get information on his rival(s) by appealing to foreign governments in exchange for American goodies then you are wrong. I don't care what letter comes after their name, wrong is wrong.
claptrap..at most it was a CFR violationabout the POTUS violating the Constitution
OMG an ambassador gets appointed because he gave money to a campaign! That never happensAnd how about Gordon Sonland, a big-time trump donor who got rewarded with an ambassadorship.
POTUS phone calls have been leaked like an open book - Occam's razor says that's why the higher classified serverThere are different classification for Presidential communications. This conversation may not have met standards for the server where it was hidden.
The Usual Suspects at workBrennan's plant believes he is Above the Law, as do many in the CIA, as we have learned....
Secret Schiff Star Chamber in his SCIFSlimey Schiff
No, it is a cover up because his attorney knows it’s not a perfect call.POTUS phone calls have been leaked like an open book - Occam's razor says that's why the higher classified server
ROFL..tell it to Mike FlynnIf you tell the truth, you don’t have to worry about a perjury trap.
OMG an ambassador gets appointed because he gave money to a campaign! That never happens![]()
Mike Flynn didn’t tell the truth.ROFL..tell it to Mike Flynn
No, there is an actual agency that handles that, and there are guidelines.
so lets see he releases the transcript ( which all involved say it correct with perhaps minor details not) but placing the recording on a higher classified server is a cover up?? do you actually think things thru before you post?No, it is a cover up because his attorney knows it’s not a perfect call.
This is 100% right on. If trump could be lured into a perjury trap it's because he's a stone-cold liar about almost everything.
Horse shit. The POTUS is the ULTIMATE DETERMINER OF CLASSIFICATION.
Makeup some more nonsense.