Domer desperate for attention:
![]()

Is that the best you have, cunt?
You can’t refute my post, so you post some diversionary bullshit.
Laughable clown.

Domer desperate for attention:
![]()


Is that the best you have, cunt?
You can’t refute my post, so you post some diversionary bullshit.
Laughable clown.
I regularly kick your ignorant ass.
No, you regularly make yourself look like a vulgar asshat. But you would need an IQ above room temperature and a modicum of self awareness to figure that out.![]()

You’re low hanging fruit, you flaccid little prick. It’s not even a challenge to make you look like the idiot that you ate.
Here’s a challenge for you, taintlicker. What do these mean?...

^^Pathetic, low IQ, vulgar dullard doesn't think he looks like a moron.![]()

WTF?
The dude admitted to trying to alter the transcript??

QUESTIONABLE SOURCENot a reputable source that practices professional journalistic standards.
Not a reputable source that practices professional journalistic standards.
Try again.
Another fucking loser that can’t answer a simple question.
What do these mean, shitstain?
...
Trump didn’t testify because Mullet lacked the justification for it.
Aka ‘lacking evidence’. If Weismann could have forced Trump to testify he absolutely would have—but he lacked the goods.
I’ve learned to be skeptical of people the News Fakers claim to have character.
No, I think he was doing his job.Let's see the Col. is a registered Democrat, close to Biden of course his testimony would never be biased in any way.
I think you're grasping at straws. There's no proof of these witnesses' "ties to Biden" nor any of their voting record. Transparent, eh? What happened to all the crying from the RWers about "secret hearings" and "we want transparency"? So now you got it, and you're STILL crying.
President Betrayer is going down. You all are just going to have to deal with that.
Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.
Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.
We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?
We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~
When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.
Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.
Wrong, he wrote his answers, or I should say his lawyers did, to Mueller, but Trump didn’t answer all the questions.
I should have clarified and stated he didn’t testify in person.
You support Trump, I don’t think you can be a good judge of character.
They ignore the fact that it was then hidden on a server for top secret classified information. Why, if it was the best conversation, ever?
There is nothing damning about the transcript you partisan twat. Yeah, it was so damning Trump released with total transparency.
You leftists are morons on steroids and mentally retarded to parrot the bullshit Adam Schiff feeds you.
![]()