Vindman Tried to Alter Call Transcript. Failed

Domer desperate for attention:

giphy.gif

:lolup:

Is that the best you have, cunt?

You can’t refute my post, so you post some diversionary bullshit.

Laughable clown.

:rofl2:
 
No, you regularly make yourself look like a vulgar asshat. But you would need an IQ above room temperature and a modicum of self awareness to figure that out. ;)

:lolup:

You’re low hanging fruit, you flaccid little prick. It’s not even a challenge to make you look like the idiot that you ate.

Here’s a challenge for you, taintlicker. What do these mean?

...
 
You’re low hanging fruit, you flaccid little prick. It’s not even a challenge to make you look like the idiot that you ate.

Here’s a challenge for you, taintlicker. What do these mean?...

^^Pathetic, low IQ, vulgar dullard doesn't think he looks like a moron. :laugh:
 
WTF?

The dude admitted to trying to alter the transcript??

You believe "Uncle Sam's Misguided Children", an extreme right-bias site? :rofl2:

Thanks, but I'll wait until someone more legitimate reports this.


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children Questionable based on Extreme Right bias, promotion of conspiracies and propaganda, lack of ownership transparency and numerous instances of publishing fake news as verified through several failed fact checks.

 
Not a reputable source that practices professional journalistic standards.

Try again.

The entire premise is a lie anyway. The altering and editing was done by the Trump crime ring and Vindman wanted it to reflect the truth in its actual wording. The right has decided to live in Orwellian world.
 
Trump didn’t testify because Mullet lacked the justification for it.

Aka ‘lacking evidence’. If Weismann could have forced Trump to testify he absolutely would have—but he lacked the goods.

I’ve learned to be skeptical of people the News Fakers claim to have character.

Wrong, he wrote his answers, or I should say his lawyers did, to Mueller, but Trump didn’t answer all the questions.

I should have clarified and stated he didn’t testify in person.

You support Trump, I don’t think you can be a good judge of character.
 
I think you're grasping at straws. There's no proof of these witnesses' "ties to Biden" nor any of their voting record. Transparent, eh? What happened to all the crying from the RWers about "secret hearings" and "we want transparency"? So now you got it, and you're STILL crying.

President Betrayer is going down. You all are just going to have to deal with that.

They ignore the fact that it was then hidden on a server for top secret classified information. Why, if it was the best conversation, ever?
 
Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.

Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.


We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?

We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~

When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.

Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.

Brennan's plant believes he is Above the Law, as do many in the CIA, as we have learned....
 
Wrong, he wrote his answers, or I should say his lawyers did, to Mueller, but Trump didn’t answer all the questions.

I should have clarified and stated he didn’t testify in person.

You support Trump, I don’t think you can be a good judge of character.

Well, apparently Mullet didn’t write the questions so there ya go lol.

Mullet/Weismann/whoever, would have liked nothing better than to force Trump into an interview—for perjury trap purposes. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would have their answers cleared by a lawyer [or a team of them, if you are president] under such circumstances.

Apparently, they were unable to get what they were looking for, so they were unable to interview Trump face to face.

You were had, with the Mullet fiasco.
 
They ignore the fact that it was then hidden on a server for top secret classified information. Why, if it was the best conversation, ever?

To SECURE Presidential diplomatic communications….instead of making every word w/foreign leaders public.


IOW Intelligent diplomacy.
 
Back
Top