Vindman Tried to Alter Call Transcript. Failed
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
^Another fucking idiot that thinks this is a criminal proceeding.
But, in a courtroom, the “transcript” is inadmissible because it’s not a true and accurate copy of all that was said.
The ellipses (...) indicate there’s missing passages.
CHECKMATE, cunt.
reagansghost
eternal
he tried to fill in the missing facts, corruption and treachery nixed all that
why do you hate Vindman comrade asshole?
you don't understand the process,when you do then you can debate it
How do you know this? Oh, that's right!! You make up your bullshit as you go. STFU you yapping loon.
In the conversation, Trump mentions that a Ukrainian prosecutor “was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair.”
He then suggested that President Volodymyr Zelensky get in contact with Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer, and Attorney General William Barr.
“The other thing,” Trump said, according to the transcript of the July 25 chat, which lasted 30 minutes. “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son. That Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great.
“Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you ·can look into it … It sounds horrible to me,” he said.
Zelensky assured Trump that he would look into the situation.
“The next prosecutor general will be 100 percent my person, my candidate who will be approved by the Parliament,” he told Trump.
“He or she will look into the situation. … The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case,” Zelensky said.
Trump then tells Zelensky that he will have Giuliani and the attorney general reach out to him, adding “we will get to the bottom of it.”
“I’m sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor,” Trump told Zelensky. “So good luck with everything.”
https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/white-house-releases-transcript-of-trump-call-with-ukraine-president/
Then why call it a "trial" with a justice presiding?
Dance little chihuahua, DANCE!
The SCOTUS judge just observes and doesn’t intervene.
Cunt, criminal trials require a unanimous decision. Impeachment trials require a 2/3 majority.
It’s not a criminal proceeding no matter how much you want it to be, you fucking ignorant fuck.
Jesus, the stupidity of you dumbfucks is staggering.
actually WORKED for Biden,,and if you really wanted to know you would support getting the WB to testify.
Don't forget he was advised by Schiff's staff as well (at minimum)
How do you know this? Oh, that's right!! You make up your bullshit as you go. STFU you yapping loon.
What do these mean, idiot?
...
are you on your daily sanctimonious trip? Please stop with the motivation,or questioning honesty or whatever you think you are doing -it's boorish and quite insulting both
~~
You are PROJECTING Trump is asking to "dig up dirt on his opponent" for the election/
in fact if you look at the context the convo starts off about the prosecutor being fired, meanders to Crowdstrike
and mentions Biden in that context.
It's not about criminality you clueless knucklehead; it's about voters believing that a President has been found guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors through a fair and bipartisan process. That's why they call it......wait for it.......a trial.
I do wish you had a brain, really I do.
It's not about criminality you clueless knucklehead; it's about voters believing that a President has been found guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors through a fair and bipartisan process. That's why they call it......wait for it.......a trial.
I do wish you had a brain, really I do.
Sorry, cunt. It’s not a trial in the sense you want it to be.
No prosecutor, no true judge. No unanimous decision. Nobody goes to jail upon conviction. It’s not even about voters, you fucking idiot.
Stop demonstrating your stupidity, idiot.
