"Viciously attacked"

Irish said:
Obama doesn't get shit from the media. The media loves him. He's there boy.

2nd. Trump isn't nec being thinned skinned. He feels the need to respond to attacks. And this guy using his dead son too attack trump is over the top.

3rd. Why do you and the media say the GOP "used" the benghazi dead soldiers mom, but Kahn was some kind of great folk hero.

DO you libtards live in vacuum where you don't see your own hypocrisy on a daily basis?
Click to expand...

The Benghazi mom directly said that Clinton was personally responsible for the death of her son. And no one here or anywhere I saw went after her personally; it was about the GOP using her grief.

Mr. Khan didn't blame Trump for the death of his son, or even imply such a thing. He has a problem w/ Trump's proposed Muslim ban, particularly as it relates to our constitution.
 
Thing1 said:
You mean like Trump's campaign manager working for the Russians?

I actually love that you're calling Khan "shady." You guys admit every day now that you don't care about the military, that you don't care about American sacrifice, that you don't care about patriotism. You just care about Trump.
Click to expand...

I think it is funny that this is the tack you guys are taking. I think it is a tacit admission that Crooked Hillary is a weak flawed candidate that you are afraid might lose.

Every week you trot out some new scandal/outrage which is supposed to sink Trump


McCain
Megyn Kelly
Spic judge
Melanias speech
Ban on muslimes
Now King Kahn

It is all so transparent and tedious. As if you liberals care about the troops. Did you give a flying fuck about the troops killed by Nidal? Fuck no.

Keep reaching
 
Teflon Don said:
I think it is funny that this is the tack you guys are taking. I think it is a tacit admission that Crooked Hillary is a weak flawed candidate that you are afraid might lose.

Every week you trot out some new scandal/outrage which is supposed to sink Trump


McCain
Megyn Kelly
Spic judge
Melanias speech
Ban on muslimes
Now King Kahn

It is all so transparent and tedious. As if you liberals care about the troops. Did you give a flying fuck about the troops killed by Nidal? Fuck no.

Keep reaching
Click to expand...

McCain & I are on the same page.

The right is losing the reputation of being the "pro military" side, and fast. I think it's always been a fraud, anyway.

You don't really speak for anyone. And your language shocks no one. You just need to grow up, more than anything.
 
Thing1 said:
Liberals fabricated the idea that Trump wanted to ban Muslim travel to the U.S.?

Interesting take.
Click to expand...

he said he wanted it halted until the government could assure proper vetting.......liberals must assume vetting can't happen because they pretend it would be a permanent ban........it may be true that if Democrats win the election it could never happen, but that doesn't have to be the case.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
he said he wanted it halted until the government could assure proper vetting.......liberals must assume vetting can't happen because they pretend it would be a permanent ban........it may be true that if Democrats win the election it could never happen, but that doesn't have to be the case.......
Click to expand...

He actually didn't say "vetted" until he was shamed into doing so. Originally, it was "until we figure out why they hate us" - or at least that's how he explained it when asked to clarify.

And it doesn't matter. It's against the constitution. You can say that the constitution only protects American citizens, but not discriminating based on religion is a core principle. You'd be splitting hairs.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Khan works for law firm that scores big money in selling EB-2 and EB-5 visas. For $500K you can buy a visa and a set of green cards for the wife [wives lol?] and kids.

In other words, Khan isn't your garden variety Muslim immigrant that runs the corner bagel shop.

And why is this not the least bit suprising?
Click to expand...

Really, Muslims run bagel shops in the US?
 
trumptweet.jpg



 
Thing1 said:
The Benghazi mom directly said that Clinton was personally responsible for the death of her son. And no one here or anywhere I saw went after her personally; it was about the GOP using her grief.

Mr. Khan didn't blame Trump for the death of his son, or even imply such a thing. He has a problem w/ Trump's proposed Muslim ban, particularly as it relates to our constitution.
Click to expand...

Spare me. He was using his son's death to attack Trumps policy. It was the exact same thing. Quit splitting hairs.
 
Irish said:
Spare me. He was using his son's death to attack Trumps policy. It was the exact same thing. Quit splitting hairs.
Click to expand...

Well, we can disagree on whether or not there is a difference between going after someone's policy, and going after them personally.

But again, we're talking about the reaction more than anything. No one prominent went after the Benghazi mom on a personal level. Trump is going after the Khans on that personal level. It's why it's exploding in the media, and why many Republicans have issued statements today about it. Trump creates his own stories. If he let the Khans have their say & left it at that, the media would be talking about other topics.
 
Loyal Lapdoggy Hack Hussein said:
Khan works for law firm that scores big money in selling EB-2 and EB-5 visas. For $500K you can buy a visa and a set of green cards for the wife [wives lol?] and kids. In other words, Khan isn't your garden variety Muslim immigrant that runs the corner bagel shop. And why is this not the least bit suprising?
Click to expand...


You think Muslims run bagel shops? :palm:

Spin this for my amusement, little lapdoggy:



f70c051a-6540-47ef-816f-715935076b40




Akoya_Damac_83.jpg
 
Thing1 said:
Well, we can disagree on whether or not there is a difference between going after someone's policy, and going after them personally.

But again, we're talking about the reaction more than anything. No one prominent went after the Benghazi mom on a personal level. Trump is going after the Khans on that personal level. It's why it's exploding in the media, and why many Republicans have issued statements today about it. Trump creates his own stories. If he let the Khans have their say & left it at that, the media would be talking about other topics.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree, Trump is his own worst enemy. If he was more sensible, he'd be running away with this election.
 
Thing1 said:
The Benghazi mom directly said that Clinton was personally responsible for the death of her son. And no one here or anywhere I saw went after her personally; it was about the GOP using her grief.

Mr. Khan didn't blame Trump for the death of his son, or even imply such a thing. He has a problem w/ Trump's proposed Muslim ban, particularly as it relates to our constitution.
Click to expand...


Hmmm, so why did he need to drag his son's corpse around the democrat stage? You know I am no Trump fan, but the guy used his son's death to make a political point. And the guy specifically called out Trump. I think it's fair for Trump to respond. Of course he'll make a stupid response, but that's neither here nor there.

I found Khan's use of his dead son to be in poor taste. If immigration was the subject there was no need to bring up his son.
 
tinfoil said:
Hmmm, so why did he need to drag his son's corpse around the democrat stage? You know I am no Trump fan, but the guy used his son's death to make a political point. And the guy specifically called out Trump. I think it's fair for Trump to respond. Of course he'll make a stupid response, but that's neither here nor there.

I found Khan's use of his dead son to be in poor taste. If immigration was the subject there was no need to bring up his son.
Click to expand...
Yes, there was to show that Muslims immigrants who move to the USA, like Kahn are just like the rest of us, they love their country, they all aren't terrorist. His immigrant son made the ultimate sacrifice for our country. He made a sacrifice that even some natural born Americans don't make.
 
tinfoil said:
Hmmm, so why did he need to drag his son's corpse around the democrat stage? You know I am no Trump fan, but the guy used his son's death to make a political point. And the guy specifically called out Trump. I think it's fair for Trump to respond. Of course he'll make a stupid response, but that's neither here nor there.

I found Khan's use of his dead son to be in poor taste. If immigration was the subject there was no need to bring up his son.
Click to expand...

I know you're not a Trump fan. But, you also have to consider the dual purpose there: I've been reading since his speech about how important it was to the Muslim community to hear someone speak like that on the national stage. To let everyone know that they're patriotic Americans, too - and what is more patriotic than a family member who sacrificed his life to save his fellow soldiers, in the service of his country?

I get it. Trump certainly has a right to respond, but he should have left it alone.
 
tinfoil said:
Hmmm, so why did he need to drag his son's corpse around the democrat stage? You know I am no Trump fan, but the guy used his son's death to make a political point. And the guy specifically called out Trump. I think it's fair for Trump to respond. Of course he'll make a stupid response, but that's neither here nor there.

I found Khan's use of his dead son to be in poor taste. If immigration was the subject there was no need to bring up his son.
Click to expand...

What about the Benghazi mom?
 
Teflon Don said:
So the lefties think Kahn is the way they are going to take Trump down now? I wish you luck
Click to expand...

Trump has already made the Khans decide they don't want to keep dealing with all of this, they are backing out. They found out they couldn't stump the trump.

Also apparently the guy had connections to a clinton affiliate law firm. Not that it changes that his son is dead, but he wasn't some random that came out of no where. Still think he should blame clinton for killing his kid though over being mad at trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top