You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Vegas Killer not qualified to fly an airplane, allowed to buy guns.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Getin the ring
Verified User
A good start would be liberals allowing us to actually enforce laws already on the books.
THATS where the breakdown started, pandering to the criminals so they vote a certain way
FAMM (Families Against Mandatory Minimums) for instance think criminals should be given leniency even if they own a gun and commit a crime.
Drug dealers with guns are non-violent criminals and should not be sentenced according to federal law they say.
http://famm.org/projects/federal/us-congress/gun-mandatory-minimum-sentences/
So yea the best start would be to let people that possess guns know we are serious in that they can not commit ANY crime, be involved in any crime, because when you are involved in crime, especially drugs you are also involved with other people that commit crimes, peddle death, and otherwise resort to violence in most cases.
this nut-job in Vegas was still going to kill people. I don't think the law's really mattered to him
the real mass murders are happening everyday on our streets.
Please liberals, get off the soap box and enter reality with the rest of us.
THATS where the breakdown started, pandering to the criminals so they vote a certain way
FAMM (Families Against Mandatory Minimums) for instance think criminals should be given leniency even if they own a gun and commit a crime.
Drug dealers with guns are non-violent criminals and should not be sentenced according to federal law they say.
http://famm.org/projects/federal/us-congress/gun-mandatory-minimum-sentences/
So yea the best start would be to let people that possess guns know we are serious in that they can not commit ANY crime, be involved in any crime, because when you are involved in crime, especially drugs you are also involved with other people that commit crimes, peddle death, and otherwise resort to violence in most cases.
this nut-job in Vegas was still going to kill people. I don't think the law's really mattered to him
the real mass murders are happening everyday on our streets.
Please liberals, get off the soap box and enter reality with the rest of us.
Last edited:
It says right to bear arms. That was the original intent. Obviously, you can't read.
Reference the word "militia", fucktard.
See, you keep lying; but then, it's probably because of your lack of education.
So sad
Hey, they will probably let you drive to the end of the trailer park!
no, you don't, fucktard. you don't even understand inalienable rights.
I know exactly what it means. It's just that they don't exist in our Constitution and you have failed to identify any.
Damn! That must be frustrating for you. No wonder you keep soiling your diapers over it.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I know exactly what it means. It's just that they don't exist in our Constitution and you have failed to identify any.
Damn! That must be frustrating for you. No wonder you keep soiling your diapers over it.
again, you simply do not understand the constitution, nor any of our other founding documents. you don't even know what the constitution was written for. your idiocy and ignorance is almost amusing.
again, you simply do not understand the constitution, nor any of our other founding documents. you don't even know what the constitution was written for. your idiocy and ignorance is almost amusing.
Keep floundering, little toad. Go back and have an 8 year old read the Constitution and Bill of Rights to you. When you find some inalienable rights, get back to me.
Until then, you should really SHUT THE FUCK UP, because your constant failures are wearisome
SmarterthanYou
rebel
then embarrass me, fuckstick. explain EXACTLY what the constitution was written for. it's that or you can stfu and be ignored for your shit filled brainpain.
So if a criminal has a gun then that's crime and they should charged and sentenced for it. I suggest a minimum five year jail sentence.
As I said, idiots want things to be done to restrict ownership to those of us that aren't criminals with the mindset that criminals won't get guns.
Laws are already on the books prohibiting criminals from having guns. Interesting that criminals still get them despite a piece of paper saying they can't possess them.
Reference the word "militia", fucktard.
I did, BOY. My State's laws provide three classification of militia. I fit into one of them.
When you actually have something worthwhile to say, say it. Until then, to avoid embarrassing your dumbass, my suggestion is to keep your pie hole shut.
Hey, they will probably let you drive to the end of the trailer park!
You mean the one where I meet your wife and leave when I'm done with her?
I did, BOY. My State's laws provide three classification of militia. I fit into one of them.
When you actually have something worthwhile to say, say it. Until then, to avoid embarrassing your dumbass, my suggestion is to keep your pie hole shut.
Good, shithead. Then you agree that it was a collective right, not an individual one.
Glad that's settled.
Last edited:
then embarrass me, fuckstick. explain EXACTLY what the constitution was written for. it's that or you can stfu and be ignored for your shit filled brainpain.
lol
For inalienable rights? You are just the gift that keeps on giving, tardboy.
You do realize, tardboy, that the Bill of Rihhts was included as an afterthought as a POLITICAL tool. Nothing sent from in high, tardboy.
Good, shithead. Then you agree that it is a collective right, not an individual one.
Glad that's settled.
Where do I agree with that, nigger?
Why do you choose to be embarrassed, boy?
The classification addresses me as an individual. Sorry that you don't realize it.
lol
For inalienable rights? You are just the gift that keeps on giving, tardboy.
You do realize, tardboy, that the Bill of Rihhts was included as an afterthought as a POLITICAL tool. Nothing sent from in high, tardboy.
Then when should I expect you to come and try to take my guns, pussy? You've shown pictures claiming where I live. That leaves nothing for you but opportunity. I don't expect to see you. You don't have the guts.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
lol
For inalienable rights? You are just the gift that keeps on giving, tardboy.
You do realize, tardboy, that the Bill of Rihhts was included as an afterthought as a POLITICAL tool. Nothing sent from in high, tardboy.
so you're unable to explain EXACTLY what the constitution was written for. understandable, since we've known you had no clue anyway.
Where do I agree with that, nigger?
Why do you choose to be embarrassed, boy?
The classification addresses me as an individual. Sorry that you don't realize it.
Militia, tardboy, militia.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Good, shithead. Then you agree that it is a collective right, not an individual one.
you have to be a certifiable moron to believe that 9 of the 10 Amendments in the BoR is for individual rights while the one remaining is a collective right. CERTIFIABLE MORON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so you're unable to explain EXACTLY what the constitution was written for. understandable, since we've known you had no clue anyway.
lol
Keep floundering, dimwit. Keep looking for those 'inalienable' rights.
No courthouse visit yet, coward? Afraid to test how 'inalienable' that right is? Yes, of course you're afraid. Afraid to discover your precious 2nd IS alienable.
The cognitive dissonance must be overwhelming for you.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so you're unable to explain EXACTLY what the constitution was written for. understandable, since we've known you had no clue anyway.