Using common sense, what is the difference between cooperation and collusion?

You must be kidding.
A year old opinion article does not refute findings just released now, such as the fact that. Trump lied to Mueller.

You or the Senate have evidence of this [that would stand up in court] or is it just the Senate’s conclusion?

Before you goof balls get out ahead over your skies [for about the 10,000th time] you need to understand that matters a bit.
 
So you are saying that the majority of GOP Senators sitting on that Committee, some who are Trump ass kissers, who have been examining the evidence for three years, were duped?

I’m sure if I asked you provide some blogger’s narrative or something similar showing how Kilimnik was a free agent, but I’ll go with those who actually examined all the evidence

Does anyone actually know—in a slam dunk sense, that Kilimnik was a Russian agent or this more speculation we’re ‘supposed to just accept’ to keep the theory afloat?

Also, it’s notable that Mullet *tried very hard* to find something like collusion or conspiracy between Manafort and the Russians and his reported concluded there was none.

Keep in mind the ‘Trump is President and cant be charged’ excuse doesn’t work with Manafort. Mullet had access to Manafort and *the presumed/assumed* Russian agent’s communications as part of Manafort’s bargain.

Yet, Mullet could not charge Manafort with conspiring with Russians on the election. Doesn’t make any sense. What makes sense is that Manafort and Kilimnicks communications were business related—Manafort was charged with garden variety white collar crimes.

Sounds a bit like the end of the Manafort and ‘Russian agent’ story.
 
Back
Top