Under pressure FBI Director Kash Patel claims agency has ‘evidence’ that 2020 election was stolen from Trump: ‘Stay tuned this week'

BartenderElite said:
Just reading some comments on the internet about this story - it's truly crazy how many there are that STILL believe Trump won that election in a "landslide."

Only because Trump said so. They're absolutely convinced it was stolen - only because Trump said so.
Click to expand...
They ain't called MAGA morons for nuthin'. :)

MAGA is a cult of personality.

Cult of Personality · Decoding Political Propaganda · Nabb Research Center Online Exhibits

Online exhibits created by the curators and librarians at the Edward H. Nabb Research Center for Delmarva History and Culture at Salisbury University in Salisbury, Maryland.
libapps.salisbury.edu
A cult of personality arises when a leader is represented as larger-than-life through imagery and words of uncritical praise and flattery. Propaganda is a common vehicle used to help create personality cults. Leaders are often depicted as superhuman, courageous, wise, and incapable of error. If a leader is viewed as god-like, it is less likely followers will criticize or question their policies or challenge their power.

aprx11.jpg
 
QP! said:
You are simply in denial if you do not understand that this "confidence" you are trying to reach is ONLY achieved when Democrats can no longer win any core elections.
Click to expand...
It seems that Democrats ALREADY, sans "Black Jesus", can't win Presidential elections without election fraud.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Lots of MAGA morons believe everything Trump tells them. This forum is full of them.
Click to expand...
I'm really unsure on this issue.

Way back in Pigshit's first term,
I opined with confidence on this forum
that trumpanzees come in two brain sizes...
walnut size and BB size.

Certainly, the ones with the BB size brains believe all that Pigshit says.
I suspect, though, that the walnut-brained ones know that it's all bullshit,
but say it specifically for our reaction to their saying it.

They don't care about Pigshit's terrible results at all.
That won't sway them a bit.
They only care about "sticking it to the libs,"
and in that area more important to them--more important than their actual quality of life--

they believe that they're winning.

Even a walnut-sized brain can only take one so far.
Don't count on their having revelations.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I'm really unsure on this issue.

Way back in Pigshits first term,
I opined with confidence on this forum
that trumpanzees come in two brain sizes...
walnut size and BB size.

Certainly, the ones with the BB size brains believe all that Pigshit says.
I suspect, though, that the walnut-brained ones know that it's all bullshit,
but say it specifically for our reaction to their saying it.

They don't care about Pigshit's terrible results at all.
That won't sway them a bit.
They only care about "sticking it to the libs,"
and in that area more important to them--more important than their actaul quality of life--

they believe that they're winning.

Even a walnut-sized brain can only take one so far.
Don't count on their having revelations.
Click to expand...
The demographic of JPP is unique compared to other forums. It's primarily Stormfront's Geriatric Wing; elderly, racist, misogynistic Euro-American male MAGAts.

There's been a clear effort to support them and push back on anyone who disagrees via special rules, special punishments and open statements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Dutch Uncle said:
The demographic of JPP is unique compared to other forums. It's primarily Stormfront's Geriatric Wing; elderly, racist, misogynistic Euro-American male MAGAts.

There's been a clear effort to support them and push back on anyone who disagrees via special rules, special punishments and open statements.
Click to expand...
Interesting and credible take.
 
gfm7175 said:
It seems that Democrats ALREADY, sans "Black Jesus", can't win Presidential elections without election fraud.
Click to expand...
And @Damocles wants Democrats to submit to whatever would convince the idiot above to have "Confidence" in election results, arguing 'whatever it takes to make him "confident" is something the US needs to do".

It is idiotic and i do not believe Damo believes it. I believe he does want it though, knowing what that means for results.
 
QP! said:
And @Damocles wants Democrats to submit to whatever would convince the idiot above to have "Confidence" in election results, arguing 'whatever it takes to make him "confident" is something the US needs to do".

It is idiotic and i do not believe Damo believes it. I believe he does want it though, knowing what that means for results.
Click to expand...
MAGAts only see what they want to see. Those with the power to do so can shape the narrative to fit their world view. This is easily seen by Fox News or any other group that seeks to deceive people into believing something that isn't quite true. These people, regardless of political affiliation, religion, nationality or culture, can be recognized with a habitual usage of half-truths sprinkled with outright lies.

www.ebsco.com

Big lie | Social Sciences and Humanities | Research Starters | EBSCO Research

<p>The "big lie" is a concept suggesting that a falsehood can gain acceptance if it is repeated frequently and is grand enough that individuals cannot fathom its untruth. This idea has historical roots, notably attributed to Adolf Hitler’s writings in his 1925 manifesto, *Mein Kampf*, where he...
www.ebsco.com www.ebsco.com
The "big lie" is a concept suggesting that a falsehood can gain acceptance if it is repeated frequently and is grand enough that individuals cannot fathom its untruth. This idea has historical roots, notably attributed to Adolf Hitler’s writings in his 1925 manifesto, *Mein Kampf*, where he argued that larger lies are more believable than smaller ones. The Nazis effectively utilized this concept to scapegoat the Jewish population, ultimately justifying horrific acts during the Holocaust. In contemporary contexts, the big lie continues to manifest in political discourse, with notable examples including former President Donald Trump’s claims about the 2020 election being "stolen" and Russian President Vladimir Putin's assertions regarding Western threats prior to the invasion of Ukraine. Psychologists explain the enduring appeal of the big lie by suggesting that the human mind often prefers comforting falsehoods over inconvenient truths, leading to the acceptance of repeated statements regardless of their factual basis. This phenomenon highlights the challenges in discerning truth in environments rife with misinformation.
 
QP! said:
And @Damocles wants Democrats to submit to whatever would convince the idiot above to have "Confidence" in election results, arguing 'whatever it takes to make him "confident" is something the US needs to do".

It is idiotic and i do not believe Damo believes it. I believe he does want it though, knowing what that means for results.
Click to expand...
You wanna know what would go a long way in increasing my confidence in legitimate election results?

For starters:
Election DAY only... NOT "election week" (no early voting)
All votes must be counted on election day (no "counting ballots for days/weeks")
Nationwide ban on "ballot harvesting"
Paper ballots only
Nationwide voter ID requirement based on proof of citizenship
Nationwide requirement for everyone to re-register to vote every X years
Nationwide ban on drop boxes
Nationwide ban of "vote by mail" and "absentee voting" (except for those who are medically incapable of showing up in person)
 
Last edited:
Moosakofsky said:
Do you realize we got here w/ Trump because you dolts elected a brain dead mummy in 2020 and then didn't even bother to have a democratic process to nominate a viable candidate after you could no longer pretend Brandon was lucent?
I guess not.
Click to expand...
Go whine some more, Mooselips.
 
Moosakofsky said:
Do you realize we got here w/ Trump because you dolts elected a brain dead mummy in 2020 and then didn't even bother to have a democratic process to nominate a viable candidate after you could no longer pretend Brandon was lucent?
I guess not.
Click to expand...
Yup, maybe they should have put up a better candidate than a brain-dead puppet or a drunk cackling hyena.

They HAD Tulsi Gabbard in their camp, who I would've voted for, but nope... they decided to chase her away to the "MAGA camp" instead. I'd still happily vote for her. She's one of the good ones, and probably my favorite person in President Trump's cabinet.
 
gfm7175 said:
Yup, maybe they should have put up a better candidate than a brain-dead puppet or a drunk cackling hyena.

They HAD Tulsi Gabbard in their camp, who I would've voted for, but nope... they decided to chase her away to the "MAGA camp" instead. I'd still happily vote for her. She's one of the good ones, and probably my favorite person in President Trump's cabinet.
Click to expand...
There was Andrew Yang too.
 
Moosakofsky said:
There was Andrew Yang too.
Click to expand...
I found him to be better than Sleepy Joe and Cackling Kamala, whatever that's worth, but he still wasn't my cup of tea.

Out of all the Democrats running in 2020, I was a Tulsi fan through and through. She's the only Democrat who I would have voted for in 2020.
 
gfm7175 said:
You wanna know what would go a long way in increasing my confidence in legitimate election results?

For starters:
Election DAY only... NOT "election week" (no early voting)
All votes must be counted on election day (no "counting ballots for days/weeks")
Nationwide ban on "ballot harvesting"
Paper ballots only
Nationwide voter ID requirement based on proof of citizenship
Nationwide requirement for everyone to re-register to vote every X years
Nationwide ban on drop boxes
Nationwide ban of "vote by mail" and "absentee voting" (except for those who are medically incapable of showing up in person)
Click to expand...
If Dems had a sweeping wave win with all that in place no magats would believe with confidence that everything you names was not "Rigged" somehow by the Dems to win.

Do you deny that?
 
QP! said:
If Dems had a sweeping wave win with all that in place no magats would believe with confidence that everything you names was not "Rigged" somehow by the Dems to win.

Do you deny that?
Click to expand...
But none of that is in place, and almost guaranteed never will be, so who knows...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top