U.N. Authorizes Military Strikes on Libya

Yurt said:
it doesn't just say airstrikes only...it says military action and other security measures. its hilarious that you feel airstrike military INVASION is ok, but "unilateral" invasion is not. you, like tom, want to subvert our country's constitution to the UN. it doesn't matter what they thought, they believed FORCE, MILITARY force, if needed, was ok. they supported it. they funded it.

i can't believe you guys support one kind of invasion but not the other. thats pure hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

Just to reiterate, before you completely succeed in moving the goalposts...
 
Onceler said:
Classic pathology, again.

Your statement about supporting one kind of invasion & not another was a real "step in it" kind of statement, as I'm sure you realize by now. Clearly, there are different circumstances for every military action; if you support one military effort, it doesn't mean you support every other one.

Afghanistan was not a threat to us, but it doesn't matter. Neither was Iraq, and neither is Libya. All 3 represent 3 extremely different sets of circumstances.

But not in Yurtsie-land. I was wondering how you'd weasel out....
Click to expand...

here we go again....YOU'RE A LIAR, PATHOLOGICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the statement is entirely accurate. iraq and afghanistan are TWO different wars, even you concede this, yet i'm stepping in it? LOL.

i will repeat, how can you support this military action and be against iraq? they are both invasions. this authorization is NOT limited to airstrikes. there is a very real possibility of boots on the ground. see, you're a hypocrite becasue you have no problem with this invasion, but all sorts of issues with iraq. you have no problem with killing people by airplane, but god forbid we put boots on the ground.

go play a video game, with your right hand this time :D
 
bravo said:
Whats strange is you think its OK to kill people from the air with missiles and bombs but not from the sights of a rifle.....

what a pinhead view of reality....
Click to expand...

I know that you hate the UN and believe that the US has the God given right to pursue its foreign policy without restraint. International law, is just that, it applies even to the US.
 
Onceler said:
Classic pathology, again.

Your statement about supporting one kind of invasion & not another was a real "step in it" kind of statement, as I'm sure you realize by now. Clearly, there are different circumstances for every military action; if you support one military effort, it doesn't mean you support every other one.

Afghanistan was not a threat to us, but it doesn't matter. Neither was Iraq, and neither is Libya. All 3 represent 3 extremely different sets of circumstances.

But not in Yurtsie-land. I was wondering how you'd weasel out....
Click to expand...
Yeah...a pinhead supports killing an enemy with a missile but won't kill that same enemy with a hand grenade....

explain that reasoning to me, pinhead....

(this ought to be interesting, if I get an real answer)
 
"i can't believe you guys support one kind of invasion but not the other. thats pure hypocrisy. "

But not Afghanistan....because that's DIFFERENT.

I'm enjoying the pathology....
 
Onceler said:
Just to reiterate, before you completely succeed in moving the goalposts...
Click to expand...

would you grow the fuck up. seroiusly, every single thread, every single day. you do this to multiple posters.

i should start going around and saving your posts and say: before you lie again

you're the most petulant p'tard on the planet. i have an annoying neighborhood kid (about 10, 145 pounds of krispy creme fat) and he is less annoying and petulant than you
 
Yurt said:
would you grow the fuck up. seroiusly, every single thread, every single day. you do this to multiple posters.

i should start going around and saving your posts and say: before you lie again

you're the most petulant p'tard on the planet. i have an annoying neighborhood kid (about 10, 145 pounds of krispy creme fat) and he is less annoying and petulant than you
Click to expand...

You sound frustrated.

Seriously - read through your statement about invasions, and then look at what you said about Afghanistan. And tell me how you're not moving the goalposts, and being pathological.
 
Onceler said:
"i can't believe you guys support one kind of invasion but not the other. thats pure hypocrisy. "

But not Afghanistan....because that's DIFFERENT.

I'm enjoying the pathology....
Click to expand...

and again....YOU'RE A LIAR - tff because you claim its those who always call others liars that are really the pathological liars.

let me repeat for the petulant asshole:

1. you guys claim iraq was not a threat to us.
2. libya is not a threat to us.
3. afghanistan is different beacuse they were a threat to us

do i need to dumb it down any more retard?
 
Onceler said:
You sound frustrated.

Seriously - read through your statement about invasions, and then look at what you said about Afghanistan. And tell me how you're not moving the goalposts, and being pathological.
Click to expand...

tell me how i've moved the goal post.

tell me why is it you claim people who always call others liars are pathological? because thats all you're doing now....LOL

seriously onceler, if you don't think the board is sick of your petulant shit, you need open your eyes.
 
Yurt said:
and again....YOU'RE A LIAR - tff because you claim its those who always call others liars that are really the pathological liars.

let me repeat for the petulant asshole:

1. you guys claim iraq was not a threat to us.
2. libya is not a threat to us.
3. afghanistan is different beacuse they were a threat to us

do i need to dumb it down any more retard?
Click to expand...

Afghanistan wasn't a threat to us. And there was no differentiator between "threat & non-threat" in your post, anyway.

Like I said - classic moving of the goalposts. It's as clear as it gets.
 
Yurt said:
how is it not an invasion? we are invading their soveriegn terrority. that is textbook definion of invasion. good lord.

i don't care about afghanistan. that is different than libya. libya isn't a threat to us. that was a huge reason you were against iraq. yet here you are in support of invading libya. yeah, that is also textbook hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

ah, but it is a threat to democracy and maybe we can get the oil cheaper
 
Board is sick of me? I get way more "thanks" than "groans," if that's any indicator. I only really get groans from you & bravs.

I know you & bravs are sick of me....
 
Onceler said:
Board is sick of me? I get way more "thanks" than "groans," if that's any indicator. I only really get groans from you & bravs.

I know you & bravs are sick of me....
Click to expand...

Nobody is sick of you apart from Yurt, he is the most anal and hysterical poster on this board.
 
tom prendergast said:
Nobody is sick of you apart from Yurt, he is the most anal and hysterical poster on this board.
Click to expand...

have you looked you in the mirror lately?

btw...i never said anyone was sick of "him"...rather his constant petulant bullshit...and maybe the board is hyperbole, because you far lefties love it
 
Onceler said:
Afghanistan wasn't a threat to us. And there was no differentiator between "threat & non-threat" in your post, anyway.

Like I said - classic moving of the goalposts. It's as clear as it gets.
Click to expand...

again...what goal post did i move? from the beginning i have been crystal clear that my comparison is to iraq. you want to move the goal post to afghanstan. my point from the beginning is that -- how can you support the invasion of libya, but not iraq, given you guys claim the same about iraq...eg., they are not a threat to us.
 
Onceler said:
Afghanistan wasn't a threat to us. And there was no differentiator between "threat & non-threat" in your post, anyway.

Like I said - classic moving of the goalposts. It's as clear as it gets.
Click to expand...
Thats probably why we didn't attack the country of Afghanistan...the country wasn't a threat to us....
We did attack the Al Quada terrorists, that WERE a threat to us....

Have you been in a coma or something for the last 10 years....?>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top