Tucker releases exclusive tapes from inside the Capitol on January 6th

T. A. Gardner said:
You're correct. That was McCarthy's choice to make. The problem for Pelosi was she and the Jan 6 committee had already decided on the crimes and verdict--as any good show trial does--and needed Yes Men on the committee to make that happen.

The committee didn't investigate the Capitol riot. They made a show of investigating Trump so they could pronounce crimes against him, and proclaim him guilty.

As for Cheney, she voted 96 percent of the time with Republicans while she was anti-Trump. And, there was no "insurrection," so there.
Click to expand...

That was a false post from beginning to end. Was it on Fox?
 
I'm cracking up that conservatives keep calling this "transparency."

Unless Tucker airs ALL of the footage, it's nowhere near that. Just a guy cherrypicking to support his agenda. And everyone knows it.
 
BartenderElite said:
People keep citing the Shaman getting escorted through the halls.

I'm genuinely curious: what does that change about anything that was presented by the media or 1/6 committee? Were those the only moments that guy had in the Capitol that day?
Click to expand...

There are tapes showing him running through the door into the capitol building with other insurrectionists.
 
BartenderElite said:
I'm cracking up that conservatives keep calling this "transparency."

Unless Tucker airs ALL of the footage, it's nowhere near that. Just a guy cherrypicking to support his agenda. And everyone knows it.
Click to expand...

so the January 6th committee didn't cherry pick in their release of anything? The footage of Josh Hawley was not cherry picked for maximum effect?

you are a shit stain and a liar. go procreate amongst yourself
 
ziggy said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1632915260922380288
Click to expand...
These hate Nazis are as stupid as they look. What do you think this lying group network who to the man have said they were and are total liars including this piece of shit that put together this comedy. And you can actually find a segment of this country that believes these lies. I think what we should have seen in these tapes are these hate Nazis shitting and pissing on the floor of the capital , that would be 100% True and a hell of a lot more defining than this fucker Carlson tripe.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It is OBVIOUSLY Pelosi's fault. She was the one that REFUSED to follow House tradition and rules. What was McCarthy's alternative, find two more people Pelosi objected to? How many objections would McCarthy allow before he quit trying? Pelosi wanted ONLY the most virulent, anti-Trump members of the House on that committee and she was not going to let anything stand in the way of that happening.

You counter example is disingenuous. Omar has a long history of antisemitic remarks and comments. She has shown a propensity to disregard national security too. That is what that committee does. McCarthy didn't object to the Democrat's replacement the way Pelosi surely would have. She wanted specific Republicans ON the Jan 6 committee, and she got them--the two most anti-Trump Republicans in the House.
Click to expand...

Clearly McCarthy could find people she didn't object to since she didn't object to the majority that McCarthy had chosen. At this point you don't seem to be living in reality.
Jordan and Banks were likely witnesses since they had been in contact with the WH during the attack on the Capitol.
 
Simple, anyone involved with Jan6th and anyone who supports jan 6th are Traitors to this country and should be in court for being traitors and when found guilty should be put to death.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Clearly McCarthy could find people she didn't object to since she didn't object to the majority that McCarthy had chosen. At this point you don't seem to be living in reality.
Jordan and Banks were likely witnesses since they had been in contact with the WH during the attack on the Capitol.
Click to expand...

You are missing the point. McCarthy was under NO obligation to find people Pelosi didn't object to. He, as minority leader could assign members from his party as he saw fit. Pelosi wasn't having that, bucking over 150 years of tradition in the House. She wanted pliant Republicans who would go along with the show trial.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You are missing the point. McCarthy was under NO obligation to find people Pelosi didn't object to. He, as minority leader could assign members from his party as he saw fit. Pelosi wasn't having that, bucking over 150 years of tradition in the House. She wanted pliant Republicans who would go along with the show trial.
Click to expand...

she wanted a kangaroo court proceeding and got one

If these shit stains could get away with it, they would go to trial against Trump thinking they get to choose his defense team
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You are missing the point. McCarthy was under NO obligation to find people Pelosi didn't object to. He, as minority leader could assign members from his party as he saw fit. Pelosi wasn't having that, bucking over 150 years of tradition in the House. She wanted pliant Republicans who would go along with the show trial.
Click to expand...

I guess if you completely ignore the rules of the House and in particular the rules setting up this committee, then you could make your argument.
By your argument, the minority leader can appoint people to the intelligence committee and the majority leader can't prevent them from being seated. You were just supporting that action.
Do you think Republicans that voted to not certify the election are pliant?

It seems your only point is that you want to bitch about something you approve of.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I guess if you completely ignore the rules of the House and in particular the rules setting up this committee, then you could make your argument.
By your argument, the minority leader can appoint people to the intelligence committee and the majority leader can't prevent them from being seated. You were just supporting that action.
Do you think Republicans that voted to not certify the election are pliant?

It seems your only point is that you want to bitch about something you approve of.
Click to expand...

That's not what happened. The Democrats needed some Republicans on the Jan 6 committee to give it the appearance of being bipartisan. But at the same time, they needed those Republicans to be onboard with a show trial ending in Trump's conviction / charges brought / etc. THAT is why Pelosi rejected the Republican's choices.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
That's not what happened. The Democrats needed some Republicans on the Jan 6 committee to give it the appearance of being bipartisan. But at the same time, they needed those Republicans to be onboard with a show trial ending in Trump's conviction / charges brought / etc. THAT is why Pelosi rejected the Republican's choices.
Click to expand...

You keep repeating the same lies as if you repeat them enough they will become true. Pelosi didn't reject the Republican's choices. She rejected only 2 of those proposed because they were likely to be witnesses since they had been in contact with the WH during the attack on the Capitol.

McCarthy is the one that refused appoint anyone when 2 of his choices were rejected.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You keep repeating the same lies as if you repeat them enough they will become true. Pelosi didn't reject the Republican's choices. She rejected only 2 of those proposed because they were likely to be witnesses since they had been in contact with the WH during the attack on the Capitol.

McCarthy is the one that refused appoint anyone when 2 of his choices were rejected.
Click to expand...

Pelosi shouldn't have rejected them.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You keep repeating the same lies as if you repeat them enough they will become true. Pelosi didn't reject the Republican's choices. She rejected only 2 of those proposed because they were likely to be witnesses since they had been in contact with the WH during the attack on the Capitol.

McCarthy is the one that refused appoint anyone when 2 of his choices were rejected.
Click to expand...

Exactly, and Pelosi even guaranteed the GOP representatives would be given full subpoena power on their own, a new precedent on any Congressional Committee, McCarthy turned it down figuring he could portray and discredit it as totally partisan, backfired, and now he is even trying to employ the right wing media to do what he f*cked up, with disastrous results
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top