Tucker releases exclusive tapes from inside the Capitol on January 6th

The videos do not need to be altered for it to be called "gaslighting".

The narrative is what is called "gaslighting".

Tucker claiming that they told us that the cop was killed that day is gaslighting.

Maybe you really need to read the definition a few more times to get it.

Tucker presenting these inevitable scenes of calm in a many hour mass invasion of the building is gaslighting. The Senators and Representatives, also the Vice President, weren't hiding themselves in fear that day for no reason.
 
Exactly. McCarthy should have had the free choice to seat who he wanted on that committee. Pelosi didn't want his choices because she damn well knew they would wreck the chosen outcome and narrative. She needed Yes Men, not obstinate bomb-throwers on it so they could carry out a show trail and get Trump...

McCarthy threw shit fit and refused to sit anyone on the committee. That is his fault. Not Pelosi's.
I didn't see Jeffries pull all the democrats off the intelligence committee when McCarthy refused to seat Omar.
 
McCarthy threw shit fit and refused to sit anyone on the committee. That is his fault. Not Pelosi's.
I didn't see Jeffries pull all the democrats off the intelligence committee when McCarthy refused to seat Omar.

McCarthy wanted to stack the J6 committee with Big Lie believers, not rational open-minded investigators. OTOH it was probably nearly impossible to find any of those in his party, other than the two who were seated.
 
As if they aren't already done that.

No one else is in possession of the videos. Pass that on to our resident nazi. McCarthy didn’t release it to the press. He released it to Tucker. To ensure no one could provide context to anything he shows. Convenient isn’t it?
 
McCarthy threw shit fit and refused to sit anyone on the committee. That is his fault. Not Pelosi's.
I didn't see Jeffries pull all the democrats off the intelligence committee when McCarthy refused to seat Omar.

Republicans rejected an independent committee. So tough shit. You also notice he didn’t pull all democrats off the intelligence committee which would have been the equivalent. Pelisi only rejected a couple of the choices not all of them. Then McCarthy took his marbles and went home.
 
Tucker is lying to his fans like normal. He is cherry-picking the calm moments and a few people who did not go to the capitol to end our democracy. McConnell last night said Tucker was lying. He said he believes the report of the chief of the capitol police. Other politicians who were there said Tucker is lying.
Tucker is doing exactly what McCarthy gave him all those tapes for. He O'Keefed them.
 
McCarthy threw shit fit and refused to sit anyone on the committee. That is his fault. Not Pelosi's.
I didn't see Jeffries pull all the democrats off the intelligence committee when McCarthy refused to seat Omar.

It is OBVIOUSLY Pelosi's fault. She was the one that REFUSED to follow House tradition and rules. What was McCarthy's alternative, find two more people Pelosi objected to? How many objections would McCarthy allow before he quit trying? Pelosi wanted ONLY the most virulent, anti-Trump members of the House on that committee and she was not going to let anything stand in the way of that happening.

You counter example is disingenuous. Omar has a long history of antisemitic remarks and comments. She has shown a propensity to disregard national security too. That is what that committee does. McCarthy didn't object to the Democrat's replacement the way Pelosi surely would have. She wanted specific Republicans ON the Jan 6 committee, and she got them--the two most anti-Trump Republicans in the House.
 
It is OBVIOUSLY Pelosi's fault. She was the one that REFUSED to follow House tradition and rules. What was McCarthy's alternative, find two more people Pelosi objected to? How many objections would McCarthy allow before he quit trying? Pelosi wanted ONLY the most virulent, anti-Trump members of the House on that committee and she was not going to let anything stand in the way of that happening.

You counter example is disingenuous. Omar has a long history of antisemitic remarks and comments. She has shown a propensity to disregard national security too. That is what that committee does. McCarthy didn't object to the Democrat's replacement the way Pelosi surely would have. She wanted specific Republicans ON the Jan 6 committee, and she got them--the two most anti-Trump Republicans in the House.

That is simply false. Mccarthy wanted bomb throwers on the panel. They would have disrupted the proceedings to showboat for the right and themselves. The work of the committee would have suffered. It was a serious committee investigating the Trumpys attack on the capital trying to overthrow the government.
Cheney voted with Trump 96 percent of the time. She was not anti-Trump. She was anti-insurrection.
 
That is simply false. Mccarthy wanted bomb throwers on the panel. They would have disrupted the proceedings to showboat for the right and themselves. The work of the committee would have suffered. It was a serious committee investigating the Trumpys attack on the capital trying to overthrow the government.
Cheney voted with Trump 96 percent of the time. She was not anti-Trump. She was anti-insurrection.

You're correct. That was McCarthy's choice to make. The problem for Pelosi was she and the Jan 6 committee had already decided on the crimes and verdict--as any good show trial does--and needed Yes Men on the committee to make that happen.

The committee didn't investigate the Capitol riot. They made a show of investigating Trump so they could pronounce crimes against him, and proclaim him guilty.

As for Cheney, she voted 96 percent of the time with Republicans while she was anti-Trump. And, there was no "insurrection," so there.
 
Are you watching the same footage the rest of us are?

Yes.

The same footage all those Republican's in the House and Senate lived thru and ran sprinting from danger from, and who are now coming out and on to the news to call Tuckers selective edits BS.


The question at issue here, is 'are you dumb enough to fall for Tuckers bs' and it is embarrassing if you are. Especially when you have all of Tuckers own words in the texts and emails being released PROVING he is running a campaign of lies to fool derp Trumpists. He is making fun of how gullible and stupid you all are, while continue to prove it every day.
 
7dqitz.jpg


But Tucker Carlson also knows that Trump derps are as stupid and deplorable as we all know them to be and as such he can say that one day and then put out BS Trump supporting propoganda to help keep the stock price high.

Texts: Murdoch and Fox hosts knew election claims were “crazy” but worried facts hurt “stock price”

Herp derp, herp derp.

7dqjsz.jpg
 
Back
Top