evince
Truthmatters
she lost her job for what again
Trying to cheat on third wife!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
she lost her job for what again
evince
Truthmatters
did your fuck get ossama bin ladin assminer
I don't have a problem w Trump doing it, I just love the evangelical hypocrisy!
evince
Truthmatters
assault you lying fuck face
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Well, I do have a problem with it, but the evangelical hypocrisy is pretty hilarious.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/timeline.htm
Time Line
Key events in the Jones v. Clinton lawsuit:
May 6, 1994
Paula Jones files a civil suit against President Clinton in U.S. District Court in Little Rock, Ark., seeking $700,000 in damages for "willful, outrageous and malicious conduct" at the Excelsior Hotel in Little Rock on May 8, 1991. Her court papers accuse Clinton of "sexually harassing and assaulting" her, then defaming her with denials.
August 10, 1994
Clinton files a motion to dismiss Jones's suit on grounds of presidential immunity.
December 28, 1994
U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright rules that a trial cannot take place until Clinton leaves office. But she also rules that fact-finding procedures such as taking sworn statements can proceed.
January 17, 1995
Jones asks the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis to reverse the decision postponing a trial.
February 24, 1995
Wright delays fact-finding in the case, pending a ruling by the appeals court.
September 14, 1995
A three-judge appeals court panel hears Clinton's lawyers argue that allowing Jones's case to proceed while the president is in office would distract him from more important matters. Jones's lawyers argue she should have the same rights as anyone else bringing a lawsuit.
January 9, 1996
The appeals panel rules 2 to 1 that Jones's lawsuit can go to trial.
May 15, 1996
Clinton asks the Supreme Court to delay Jones's case until he leaves office.
June 24, 1996
The Supreme Court agrees to consider whether Jones's lawsuit should be delayed until Clinton leaves office. The move puts the lawsuit on hold until after the November election.
May 27, 1997
The Supreme Court rules the lawsuit can move ahead.
August 22, 1997
Wright sets a May 27, 1998, trial date but dismisses the claim that Clinton defamed Jones.
September 9, 1997
A federal judge allows Jones's lawyers to withdraw from the suit but directs that the case stay on course for the May trial date.
December 8, 1997
Jones reduces the damages sought in her suit against Clinton to $525,000 and drops defamation claims against Clinton's co-defendant, former bodyguard Danny Ferguson.
January 16, 1998
Whitewater independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr receives formal approval to expand his inquiry to investigate the possibility of subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice in the Jones case; Linda R. Tripp, confidant of former White House intern Monica S. Lewinsky, briefs Jones lawyers about an alleged sexual relationship betweeen Lewinsky and Clinton. (For more on the Lewinsky allegations, see the Clinton Accused special report and the Clinton Accused Time Line.)
January 17, 1998
Clinton is questioned under oath by Jones's attorneys in the Washington office of his lawyer, Robert S. Bennett.
January 29, 1998
U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright issues a ruling that excludes all evidence relating to former White House aide Monica S. Lewinsky from the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton because of the "inevitable effect of disrupting" Starr's investigation.
February 17, 1998
Clinton's legal team files a motion asking Wright to throw out Paula Jones's sexual harassment lawsuit, arguing that she has not proved she suffered career harm or serious emotional anguish.
March 13, 1998
Arguing against the dismissal, Jones's attorneys file 700 pages of documents alleging that Clinton made advances at several women and took part in a "vast enterprise to suppress evidence."
March 28, 1998
Jones's attorneys file documents, though no firsthand evidence, alleging Clinton raped a woman in the late 1970s.
April 1, 1998
Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright dismisses Jones's lawsuit, granting President Clinton's request for summary judgment in the case.
April 16, 1998
A teary Jones announces she will appeal. "I believe what Mr. Clinton did to me was wrong," she says.
July 31, 1998
Jones files her appeal.
October 20, 1998
A federal appeals court hears arguments about the Jones appeal.
November 13, 1998
President Clinton reaches an out-of-court settlement with Jones, agreeing to pay her $850,000 but acknowledging no wrongdoing.
December 2, 1998
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismisses Jones's appeal in response to the settlement.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
November 13, 1998
President Clinton reaches an out-of-court settlement with Jones, agreeing to pay her $850,000 but acknowledging no wrongdoing.
December 2, 1998
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismisses Jones's appeal in response to the settlement.
EOS.
President Clinton reaches an out-of-court settlement with Jones, agreeing to pay her $850,000 but acknowledging no wrongdoing.
December 2, 1998
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismisses Jones's appeal in response to the settlement.
EOS.
LOL
Because an innocent man would definitely reach a settlement instead of fighting for the truth.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Do people REALLY think Paula Jones is lying?
We're not talking about some anomaly here. It's not like this is the only incident we've heard about w/ Clinton.
We're not talking about some anomaly here. It's not like this is the only incident we've heard about w/ Clinton.
They must believe it was all untrue. How else can you point to a settlement as a positive outcome?
The deplorable dirty is a hypocrite. I wonder if Paula Jones knows this is the way he talked about her back then.
"When Bill Clinton's sex scandals were still fresh back in the 1990s, however, Trump took a much different approach to discussing them — expressing sympathy for Hillary Clinton, defending Bill Clinton and dismissing his accusers, and in one interview with Howard Stern, making light of Bill Clinton's infidelity.
Speaking with Wolf Blitzer in November 1999 in video reviewed by CNN's KFile, Trump said Hillary Clinton had been through more public controversy than any women should have to bear.
"I think she's gone through terrible times," Trump told Blitzer in the interview. "I think she's been through more than any woman should have to bear — everything public. I mean, women go through this on a private basis and can't take it, she's on the front page of every newspaper every week with what went on in Washington."
A month before, in an interview with CNBC, Trump expressed a similar sentiment about Hillary Clinton and blasted the independent investigator Ken Starr as "a total wacko."
"I think she's a very, very good person," Trump said of Clinton. "I think she's had a very tough life the last few years. I mean, what could be tougher than that? I mean, can you imagine those evenings when he's just being lambasted by this crazy Ken Starr, who is a total wacko? There's the guy. I mean, he is totally off his rocker. And can you imagine being lambasted like that all day and then saying, 'Darling, what are we having for dinner?' It's gotta be pretty tough."
Trump also repeatedly dismissed and at times mocked Bill Clinton's accusers. In a 2008 interview with CNN, Trump called the Lewinsky scandal "totally unimportant" and said it was "nonsense" that Republicans tried to impeach him. In another interview, with CNBC in 1998 and first unearthed by the Washington Post, Trump called Clinton accuser Paula Jones "a loser." In August 1998, Trump again dismissed Jones, and said Bill Clinton was actually the victim.
"These people are just, I don't know, where he met them - where he found them," Trump continued. "But the whole group — it's truly an unattractive cast of characters. Linda Tripp, Lucianne Goldberg, I mean, this woman, I watch her on television. She is so bad. The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/09/politics/trump-clinton-sex-then-vs-now/index.html
Back in the day Dem candidate Gary Hart had to withdraw from a presidential race when it was learned he was cheating on his wife. Obviously people cared very much about it.
"Acting on an anonymous tip, the Herald had staked out Hart's Washington townhouse, and while the surveillance was flawed (it was not continuous and both house entrances were not always covered), the circumstances were suspicious enough to generate a massive media frenzy. Hart fought back, but his damage control operation collapsed in the face of other real or threatened disclosures, such as the revelation that Hart and Rice had earlier taken an overnight cruise to Bimini on the aptly christened yacht "Monkey Business."
The denouement came after a Washington Post reporter asked Hart, "Have you ever committed adultery?" Hart refused to answer the question at the time, but the meaning of the query soon became clear. The Post had identified yet another woman with whom Hart had had a long-standing relationship. Faced with that potential disclosure as well as an overwhelming media maelstrom, Hart went home to Colorado, withdrawing from the presidential race in a bitter farewell speech on May 8."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/hart2.htm
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
It's just sex. Everyone talks about sex you prude
Mr.Badguy
Super lefty
You're saying an innocent man wouldn't settle out of court?
It's not clear in his braggadocio if he was married or not. You are sounding desperate for dirt Jarod- aren't you interested in the issues and corruption in government- or only juicy and salacious gossip?
Last edited:
yes. An innocent man would fight the charges until exonerated. Settlement is for when you know you're going to lose.