Trump's Team Looks Smarter on Russia

anatta said:
beautiful. well said..end the mono-polar madness that only the US has the say on US/Russian relations.

You don't have to grovel to Putin, you merely have to accept Russia's presence on the world stage.
Work it out, don't war it out.
Click to expand...

Just blow'in smoke up everyone's ass. The Russians hacked the election and Trump cannot be trusted. End of story.
 
" The Russians hacked the election and Trump cannot be trusted. End of story. " BF #126

We have no choice other to trust him. And the 4 year long story begins Inauguration Day.
 
Sailor said:
Big difference between "was" and "is". " Putin is an avowed SOVIET ERA COMMUNIST."
Click to expand...

So you think Putin suddenly just abandoned the ideology that he had ingrained and hammered into his brain for his entire life?

You should stick to sailing your toy boat in the bathtub, dinghy-boy.
 
Micawber said:
Sure, and he may not pay any price for it. And neither will you for supporting him and Trump.

Or will we all? Come the heck on. As Bac said, you support a total fraud asshole conman..... And putins choice!!!!!

How can you rationalize that?
Click to expand...
BAC's characterization is worthless when evaluating Trump.
He may indeed be all that -but it's superfluous to whatever he does in Office.
Which has been the point -wait and see to judge him by his results.

It's fine to criticize him; Lord knows I've ripped into Hillary -
but at least HRClinton had a political track record to make a judgement upon.

Foreign leaders always have preferences for POTUS- but again it's going to be how Putin and Trump react
 
anatta said:
BAC's characterization is worthless when evaluating Trump.
He may indeed be all that -but it's superfluous to whatever he does in Office.
Which has been the point -wait and see to judge him by his results.

It's fine to criticize him; Lord knows I've ripped into Hillary -
but at least HRClinton had a political track record to make a judgement upon.

Foreign leaders always have preferences for POTUS- but again it's going to be how Putin and Trump react
Click to expand...

I think you're dumb. Trump doesn't have a track record? Yes, he does.
 
anatta said:
BAC's characterization is worthless when evaluating Trump.
He may indeed be all that -but it's superfluous to whatever he does in Office.
Which has been the point -wait and see to judge him by his results.

It's fine to criticize him; Lord knows I've ripped into Hillary -
but at least HRClinton had a political track record to make a judgement upon.

Foreign leaders always have preferences for POTUS- but again it's going to be how Putin and Trump react
Click to expand...

Nope, these TARD victims scream the sky is falling before he takes office.

Quite amusing to watch. The gifts of Nov. 8 never end.
 
Brain Food said:
Just blow'in smoke up everyone's ass. The Russians hacked the election and Trump cannot be trusted. End of story.
Click to expand...

Or at least that's the narrative the media and the left [nearly a redundancy lol] are desperately pushing. Actually, some republicans are in on it. Trump is apparently pretty threatening to some powerful interests.

But think about this: Hillary had the media on her side. The only reason they reported on the Wiki leaks is because they were forced to. Hillary had Bill meet AG Lynch on the airport tarmac---and presto, she was off the hook with the FBI. So she had the AG and the FBI on her side.

Enter Russia, who probably had something to do with the leaks depending on how much stock you put in the intelligence. Or whether not you believe Assange.

But the leaks was THE ONLY THING that wasn't in the tank for Hillary and the democrats. Hell, Trump had to fight off not only the media but his own party---and he STILL WON.

You're not seriously looking for sympathy, right?
 
"Trump doesn't have a track record? Yes, he does." G #131

Not a presidential track record. So far as I know, Trump has never held any political office at all. Class president at his high school? Dog catcher? Zippo.

What alleged track record do you have in mind? Reality show host? "You're fired!"
 
sear said:
"Trump doesn't have a track record? Yes, he does." G #131

Not a presidential track record. So far as I know, Trump has never held any political office at all. Class president at his high school? Dog catcher? Zippo.

What alleged track record do you have in mind? Reality show host? "You're fired!"
Click to expand...

Hey! Captain Aspergers is back!
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Or at least that's the narrative the media and the left [nearly a redundancy lol] are desperately pushing. Actually, some republicans are in on it. Trump is apparently pretty threatening to some powerful interests.

But think about this: Hillary had the media on her side. The only reason they reported on the Wiki leaks is because they were forced to. Hillary had Bill meet AG Lynch on the airport tarmac---and presto, she was off the hook with the FBI. So she had the AG and the FBI on her side.

Enter Russia, who probably had something to do with the leaks depending on how much stock you put in the intelligence. Or whether not you believe Assange.

But the leaks was THE ONLY THING that wasn't in the tank for Hillary and the democrats. Hell, Trump had to fight off not only the media but his own party---and he STILL WON.

You're not seriously looking for sympathy, right?
Click to expand...
good point.the media was heavily invested for Clinton.
NYTimes even went so far to go after Trump with it's "advocacy journalism" -a non sequitur if there ever was one.

WAPO went on jihad -to this day they are still heavily spinnig -but for the election they hired a bunch of erporters solely to go after Trump.

"the media" has become a self styled grotesque caricature of Pravda itself -speaking of "the Russians"
 
anatta said:
good point.the media was heavily invested for Clinton.
NYTimes even went so far to go after Trump with it's "advocacy journalism" -a non sequitur if there ever was one.

WAPO went on jihad -to this day they are still heavily spinnig -but for the election they hired a bunch of erporters solely to go after Trump.

"the media" has become a self styled grotesque caricature of Pravda itself -speaking of "the Russians"
Click to expand...

Irony abounds lol.
 
Deplorable Me said:
Nope, these TARD victims scream the sky is falling before he takes office.

Quite amusing to watch. The gifts of Nov. 8 never end.
Click to expand...

They're going to start ending for all you slump suckers in ONE WEEK.

That's when all of slump's childish behavior and Twitter tantrum nonsense becomes OFFICIAL and carries consequences.
 
Nomad said:
They're going to start ending for all you slump suckers in ONE WEEK.

That's when all of slump's childish behavior and Twitter tantrum nonsense becomes OFFICIAL and carries consequences.
Click to expand...

You need to think your little conspiracy theory through.

It's all a total load of bullshit fantasy intended to destroy Trump, but suppose Putin really does have a video of The Pissing lol. What happens if it gets out?

That's an oopsy. Because then the Russians can't black mail Trump with something that's already public. And if it got out, it's not an impeachable offense. People would adapt to it, just like they did when they found out *president* Bill Clinton was using his young interns vagina for a cigar humidor. And went onto lie about it.

You got nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top