Trump's Questionable Server

SmarterthanYou said:
pointing out that trump isn't an appointed or elected official, yet finding out and even approving of an investigation in to his dealings with a possibly sanction nation, is hardly a defense of trump. or, in your addled brain, is not outright condemning someone considered defending them?
Click to expand...

His life-long corruption, dishonesty and scamming paints a very clear picture of his character and how he'd govern.
 
evince said:
how many asshole



you are lying
Click to expand...

Right....more objective evidence in the form of LYING accusations and an ad hominem attacks...who'd a thunk it from a communist Alinsky sheep? From the lips of anger....truth is spoken. You present no evidence because there is none. How Many e-mails on the perverts lap top? 650 thousand....how many are linked directly to the router's IP address used by the Clintons under gov.com? 1000's according to the data search conducted by the FBI....how many 1000s is yet to be released.

Both the Wall St. Journal and CBS have reported these facts in evidence...the only thing not known is the content of the emails linked to the supposed secure server used by Gov. Com under Clinton's direction while serving under the seal of the United States of America's appointed position of Sec. of State. The content is moot....the evidence demonstrates the fact that the server was anything but secure. I look any day for wikileaks to drop a major bombshell from the Russians who have clearly hacked into the Sec. of States communication network. Look for fireworks about Friday....its always on the weekend, as all the propagandists have gone home for the weekend...and by Monday the spinning is a joy to behold.


AS REPORTED BY

CNBC....the propaganda network of the communist party....that should put a fork in the emotional based attacks void of any evidence. Typical "sister" act...do you shake your head like a bobble head while you type the personal ad hominem attacks? Maybe you type with the one finger method...that explains the one liner attacks....your finger gets tired. :) I've watched a great deal of Jerry Springer also...I know your MO. LMAO
 
Last edited:
I am beginning to feel sorry for the lefties. Their desperation is amazing to watch

Crooked Hilary even trotted out Miss Piggy in Florida to gin up the spic vote because she is losing the black vote
 
Althea said:
This is a long read that most won't wade through. But...With much less credible information, Trump is flapping his jowls in his effort to paint Clinton as guilty.

Well, Mr. Trump, it seems you have a rather questionable server of your own. What started as a 'white hat' program aimed at protecting the U.S from Russian hacks, ended up uncovering some interesting information.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ating_with_russia.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_fb_ru
Click to expand...

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

You trying to equate a private citizen's server to that of one used by a Secretary of State, is nothing more then a sign of shear desperation.

:lol:
 
Teflon Don said:
The answers are No, No and Nothing

Between the Comey announcement and early voting trending against Crooked Hillary they are in full on panic mode.

They are throwing everything they can against the wall. Carville's meltdown yesterday should tell you everything you need to know about where the Clinton campaign thinks the state of the race is
Click to expand...

stan-hunterton-quote-theyre-just-throwing-spaghetti-against-the-wall-t.jpg
 
Rune said:
Wrong according to Comey.
If it was the same Hillary would have been indicted so you are still dishonest.
Click to expand...
gawd damn you're beyond help..it wasn't the "gross negligence/extreme carelessness" that didn't indict her
( and they ARE the same thing)

It was what Comey called lack of "intent" - although no intent is required for the gross negligence statute section.

go drink some coffee and quit getting so loaded on weed -you are 100% hopelessly uninformed.
 
NOVA said:
You get so few chances to make a difference and you're throwing your vote away ?

A vote for Johnson or writing in Micky Mouse, IS a vote for Hillary, think about that.
Click to expand...

That way; no matter what happens, he can FEEL good about it. :palm:
 
Stretch said:
When one doesn't vote, then one can't ever complain or comment later about who finally is elected.

OK then...Clinton can't be POTUS either...business and money laundering ties to Russia, some South American countries and various Arab states while being Sec. of State.
Click to expand...

It's the old deal of "LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY" and he's decided to STFU AND STFD.

:facepalm:
 
Rune said:
Hey retard; she wasn't negligent according to Comey
Click to expand...

Really? One could say that "EXTREMELY CARELESS and NEGLIGENT are synonymous"...no? That's what the NY TIMES reported in a verbatim quote from Mr. Comey's decision....not to "recommend" any formal charges. Not recommending charges and not being found guilty of lying and careless mishandling of classified information is not the same...especially when the person not recommending the charges...has no authority to NOT TO INDICT...his duty stops at the fact finding stage. His reasoning was also faulty in finding that IGNORANCE and LACK of intent is an excuse...as evidenced by the other people found guilty and sentenced to prison for less carelessness than Clinton flaunted in the face of the PEOPLE'S OFFICE of trust.

NY TIMES: Mr. Comey "rebuked" Mrs. Clinton as being "extremely careless" in using a private email address and server. (which answers the question of how the hell some of those emails ended up on a laptop accessed by the sexual pervert Anthony Weiner). Back to the TIMES quote: He (Comey) raised questions about her judgement and contradicted statements that she had made (in other words called her on her obvious lies) about her email practices and said..."IT WAS POSSIBLE THAT HOSTILE FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS HAD GAINED ACCESS TO HER ACCOUNT..." -- Comey.

And he further declared, "A person still employed by the government (Clinton left the white house in 2013)....COULD HAVE FACED DISCIPLINARY ACTION for doing what she did."

Then comes the big lie by Comey in order to placate his boss at the DOJ, "To warrant a criminal charge (as if the contradicted lies did not warrant the criteria for criminal action...as lying to a law enforcement agency such as the FBI...is a FELONY, hell her hubby was impeached for lying).....again he reasoned wrongly and in direct conflict with the law governing the security of classified communications when he said, " ...there had to be evidence that she intentionally mishandled the information."

That's not what the Government concluded when they sentenced a sailor to a year of hard time for taking 6 pictures of the boat he was working on when he declared ignorance with no intent....they exercised the law correctly, IGNORANCE is no excuse.

The Times article from which this information came?

www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-email-comey-html?_r=0 Go figure...the TIMES seems to have misplaced that article. LMAO But the detailed statement of Mr. Comey is public record.

Its simple. YOU PROVE that Mr. COMEY did not find that Clinton contradicted her statements under oath...or that Comey did not declare that Clinton was guilty of being careless. The only thing that he said was, "There will be no charges...." After quoting 3 of the prerequisites contained in the Federal Code that qualifies as a Felony.

The facts that he found by themselves warrant a Special Prosecutor investigation....by a neutral party not affiliated in the least with any of Comey's or Clinton's political bosses.

There will be hell to pay if the Republicans retain both houses....as there can be no "double jeopardy"....as there was no formal charges...at that time, and the case can be reopened should new evidence become available, as it has..that proves carelessness and deceit/lies on the part of Clinton.


Negligent: lack of concern or careless.
 
Last edited:
anatta said:
gawd damn you're beyond help..it wasn't the "gross negligence/extreme carelessness" that didn't indict her
( and they ARE the same thing)

It was what Comey called lack of "intent" - although no intent is required for the gross negligence statute section.

go drink some coffee and quit getting so loaded on weed -you are 100% hopelessly uninformed.
Click to expand...

Fuck off retard child
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

You trying to equate a private citizen's server to that of one used by a Secretary of State, is nothing more then a sign of shear desperation.

:lol:
Click to expand...
[sic]Shear desperation is Trump claiming that this is the biggest act of corruption since Watergate. The issue here isn't the server. It's that the server is directly connected to a Russian bank.

Trump denies any claims of business dealings with Russia.

The FBI feels compelled to cover up his activities.
 
It is obvious this Russian oppo dump was a dud now Crooked Hillary has Miss Piggy introducing her saying "Trump was mean to me". Crooked Hillary is desperate and is showing all the signs of a floundering campaign that is losing. Trump needs to keep doing what he is doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top