Trump's Questionable Server

Rune said:
The answers are yes, yes, and Hillary wasn't negligent either so why the false comparison?
Click to expand...

Right.....she was not negligent...that's the reason 1000s of e-mails with her supposed secure server's ip address ended up on the lap top of a sexual predator under investigation. Nope...no negligence here folks....nothing to see, move.on.org

How did they know the e-mails in question belonged to "state.gov and Clinton accounts"? One word "METADATA". Metadata as used today with the modern technological advances works on the same principle as did the Library system of sorting data.....the IP ADDRESS acts as the data identifier....i.e., the source of origination...THE ROUTER that was used to access the world wide web....and who that router was contracted to.

Regardless of what is found in the content of these communication e-mails.....the objective evidence is now in the hands of the FBI proving that the Hildabeast 'lied'. Mr. Comey did not reach the conclusion that the Hildabeast demonstrated no "negligence" with her handing of the PEOPLE'S communications.....he was quoted as concluding there is not sufficient evidence to warrant an indictment "...at this time", but it appears her server may have been at risk. What he did promise was the demonstrable fact...."...If any further evidence surfaces...I will relay that information forward."

Guess what? More evidence surfaced...proving the fact that the server being used by the Clinton Sec. of State team was anything but SECURE....and....being a man of his word, released that information...FRIDAY.

Now TIZZY: excited state of agitation. The "pussy" accusations have ceased....now the "Trump" guilty of having unsecured server...."Trump" dumps 1000s of documents, "Trump" guilty of treason and spying for Russia....

The inversion of that which the democrats have practiced since WWII....attempted to be reflected back onto others as an attempted deflection.

All one need do to stay many steps ahead of the progressives today? Read Alinky's rules for radicals....its like having a blueprint of every election the democrats have been involved in since the 40s.

Hell...I about fell from my recliner as I watched the evening news the other night. There is a tight governors race going on in my state....Republican v. Democrat. The first attack ad by the democrat against the Republican was based upon what? You guessed it, "A PUSSY related accusation by the democrat against the republican"....I laughed my ass of.

And they call themselves "progressive".... hell, they have not changed a campaign tactic since the 60s nor an economic plan since FDRs failed communist new deal of the 30s. Progressive my ass.
 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
good, but i have no faith in the FBIs investigatory or law enforcement abilities



who is kelly ann? and did you forget AGAIN that I'm voting Johnson? that i'm not a TRUMP supporter?
Click to expand...
I don't pay attention to anyone's choice in this election. I'm not voting for anyone in the POTUS race.

This is a debate of facts. So who you vote for doesn't negate the fact that you're wrong in your defense of Trump.
 
Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou good, but i have no faith in the FBIs investigatory or law enforcement abilities

who is kelly ann? and did you forget AGAIN that I'm voting Johnson? that i'm not a TRUMP supporter?
Click to expand...

You get so few chances to make a difference and you're throwing your vote away ?

A vote for Johnson or writing in Micky Mouse, IS a vote for Hillary, think about that.
 
Althea said:
I don't pay attention to anyone's choice in this election. I'm not voting for anyone in the POTUS race.

This is a debate of facts. So who you vote for doesn't negate the fact that you're wrong in your defense of Trump.
Click to expand...

pointing out that trump isn't an appointed or elected official, yet finding out and even approving of an investigation in to his dealings with a possibly sanction nation, is hardly a defense of trump. or, in your addled brain, is not outright condemning someone considered defending them?
 
NOVA said:
You get so few chances to make a difference and you're throwing your vote away ?

A vote for Johnson or writing in Micky Mouse, IS a vote for Hillary, think about that.
Click to expand...

yeah, right. It's amazing that all of you partisan fuckers declare that libertarians are powerless or throwing their votes away, but they sure do get alot of the blame if someones candidate loses.....
 
Althea said:
This is a long read that most won't wade through. But...With much less credible information, Trump is flapping his jowls in his effort to paint Clinton as guilty.

Well, Mr. Trump, it seems you have a rather questionable server of your own. What started as a 'white hat' program aimed at protecting the U.S from Russian hacks, ended up uncovering some interesting information.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ating_with_russia.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_fb_ru
Click to expand...

We've been all through this in other threads. Trump's not a politician. He's always had real estate business relationships with Russia and plenty of other countries.
 
Althea said:
I don't pay attention to anyone's choice in this election. I'm not voting for anyone in the POTUS race.

This is a debate of facts. So who you vote for doesn't negate the fact that you're wrong in your defense of Trump.
Click to expand...

LOL! Well, if you're not willing to take a stand, put your money where you're mouth is and vote, your opinions are of no consequence.
 
Stretch said:
We've been all through this in other threads. Trump's not a politician. He's always had real estate business relationships with Russia and plenty of other countries.
Click to expand...
Oh really? So why did the Times do an article on Trump's clean bill w/respect to dealings with Russia?

Like it or not....Trump is now a politician with business ties to Russia. He cannot be trusted to be POTUS for a number of reasons...this being one of them
 
Stretch said:
LOL! Well, if you're not willing to take a stand, put your money where you're mouth is and vote, your opinions are of no consequence.
Click to expand...
You do realize that this is a message board? Opinions abound.

And choosing not to vote makes more of a statement than voting third party.
 
Althea said:
Oh really? So why did the Times do an article on Trump's clean bill w/respect to dealings with Russia?

Like it or not....Trump is now a politician with business ties to Russia. He cannot be trusted to be POTUS for a number of reasons...this being one of them
Click to expand...
business ties to Rusia is a disqualifier?
The sanctions are targeted financial sanctions ( making it difficult to deal with wesern creditors) but not a blanket prohibition
 
When one doesn't vote, then one can't ever complain or comment later about who finally is elected.

OK then...Clinton can't be POTUS either...business and money laundering ties to Russia, some South American countries and various Arab states while being Sec. of State.
 
Stretch said:
When one doesn't vote, then one can't ever complain or comment later about who finally is elected.

OK then...Clinton can't be POTUS either...business and money laundering ties to Russia, some South American countries and various Arab states while being Sec. of State.
Click to expand...
If one votes third party, they lose all credibility in any political discussion. Voting for someone who isn't qualified to lead the country is worse than not supporting any candidate.

The rest of your post doesn't merit response.
 
Althea said:
This is a long read that most won't wade through. But...With much less credible information, Trump is flapping his jowls in his effort to paint Clinton as guilty.

Well, Mr. Trump, it seems you have a rather questionable server of your own. What started as a 'white hat' program aimed at protecting the U.S from Russian hacks, ended up uncovering some interesting information.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ating_with_russia.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_fb_ru
Click to expand...

I read the entire article. Impressively researched. Not that any of this will matter to Trumploons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top