Yakuda
Verified User
I've answered this already. Are you stupid?
What YOU havent done is provide evidence e for your claim that I said trump was innocent. Do that or just admit you're a liar.
Trumps confessions…
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I've answered this already. Are you stupid?
What YOU havent done is provide evidence e for your claim that I said trump was innocent. Do that or just admit you're a liar.
The fact you dance around the question is telling, Yak.
I believe Trump violated the law and, in fact, confessed that he did on national TV with Brett Baier. The tapes also back up that conclusion.
There is no process when it comes to Presidential declassification dimwitted wonder dunce. I challenge you to find anything that corroborates your dumb claims.
If you were saner and less paranoid, you might have seen this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/06/09/trump-charges-classified-documents/
Here are the 37 charges against Trump and what they mean
A court on Friday unsealed the federal indictment against Donald Trump and an aide over classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago home and the men’s alleged efforts to keep the government from finding the materials....
...Trump is accused of violating seven federal laws but faces 37 separate charges. That is because each classified document he is accused of holding on to illegally is charged in a separate count, and his alleged efforts to hide classified information from federal investigators is charged in several ways. His longtime aide Walt Nauta faces six charges, five of which are also lodged against Trump....
Trump will have his day in court, but I doubt he'll testify. When he loses, you'll run and hide like you usually do when proved wrong, Trump Dummy.
I've seen the indictment. It's first charge is espionage. No one needs to go any further in the absurdity of these claims. It's a document issue.
Keep playing your game…. Embarrassed to say aren’t you?
Into the Night
Verified User
He didn't, and yes...it is. The DoJ does not have power of subpoena.
No, that would be you.
Void argument fallacy. 'Expert' worship. If Jack Smith is this 'brightest mind', you have a pretty low bar you are comparing to!
Indictment is not a conviction, dumbass.
He broke no law.
That's right, because he broke no law.
Political imprisonment is unconstitutional.
Trump has not be convicted of anything.
I have broken no law either.
Into the Night
Verified User
They probably will.
Bullshit. The DoJ is currently run by Democrats.
Argument of ignorance fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy. TDS.
The Constitution of the United States is not bullshit. The Presidential Records Act is not bullshit.
Trump has all the authorization he needs to retain any records he wishes. He doesn't have to declassify anything.
Into the Night
Verified User
Setting a court date is not a conviction dumbass.
Into the Night
Verified User
Trump does not have to give anything back. The DoJ is NOT authorized to view those documents, and they do NOT have any authority to limit the authority of the President of the United States (or former Presidents).
Into the Night
Verified User
Stop pretending to be a lawyer. You are a nothing.
Prosecutors fuck up cases all the time...particularly biased ones like this one.
Into the Night
Verified User
Yes.
My comment about how you are more civil to your socks got to you, eh? LOL
Into the Night
Verified User
Yes. Jarod is stupid. He routinely asks the same question over and over mindlessly even though it's already been answered.
He's a liar.
Into the Night
Verified User
What law?
Into the Night
Verified User
Into the Night
Verified User
It's not even that. Trump can retain any document he wishes.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
US law. If you were sane, you would have read the charges and seen which laws he was accused of violating.