Trumps Ban Blocked By Federal Judge

Buckly J. Ewer said:
Seattle judge blocks Trump’s immigration ban nationwide​

A federal judge in Seattle on Friday temporarily blocked President Trump’s executive order banning entry into the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries.

US District Judge James Robert, who was appointed by President George Bush in 2003, issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration's restrictions, ruling that the ban would be immediately stopped nationwide.


Within hours of the ruling, government officials told airlines to begin allowing previously barred passengers to fly, the New York Times reports. However, the White House issued a statement late Friday announcing the Department of Justice will file an emergency stay of the order.

While the federal government argues that the ban protects the country from these countries, Judge Robert said he found “no support” for those claims.

In Attorney Ferguson’s 90-page lawsuit, he claims the Trump administration is violating the Constitution’s protections for religious freedom. The state of Minnesota has also joined the state of Washington’s lawsuit which is backed by major companies including Amazon, Expedia, and several institutions of higher-education.

New York and Virginia have also taken legal action against the president'

Reacting to the complaint, White House attorneys issued a response brief, claiming that Washington state is unable to challenge the President and his intentions.

“Every President over the last 30 years has invoked this authority to suspend or impose restrictions on the entry of certain aliens or classes of aliens, in some instances including classifications based on nationality,” the brief reads, according to the Seattle Times. The brief also claims that foreign nationals do not have the constitutional right to enter the country.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/seattle-federal-judge-restraining-order-donald-trump-immigration-ban-a7562406.html

We knew it would happen... The question now is does Trump honor it or invoke a dictatorship...
Click to expand...

Consider the source. The lunatic left coast. This will be overturned in short order. ;)
 
tsuke said:
im having a hard time finding the actual decision. If anyone could link it I could read thru it.

This is from the Judge in the court room though

“I’m also asked to look and determine if the executive order is rationally based, and rationally based implies, to me, that I have to find, to some extent, it’s grounded in facts and not in fiction,” Robart said during the hearing.

Again not based on consitutionality but rather on whether the order is effective or not. Amazon and Expedia also presented evidence as to how their business could be hurt for the court. Which has nothing to do with constitutionality.
Click to expand...

You can kill an hour and watch it here: http://www.uscourts.gov/cameras-courts/state-washington-vs-donald-j-trump-et-al
 
SmarterthanFew said:
this idiot judge needs to be removed from the bench and have no further ability to be a judge, much less practice law. it is completely irrelevant whether the judge found 'no support' or not, it's the executive branch's authority over who can be allowed entry in to the country and who cannot, not the judiciary
Click to expand...

Name all the terrorists who attacked within the US that came here from the effected countries...
I'll wait...
 
Milagro said:
6b05d38db3bee7c9a5baf085e2a04823.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Slimy racist, rapist ...
 
hmm he says immediate and irreperable damage. Yet the ban is only 90 days. The fact that it is temporary means that it cannot be irrepairable right?

i also lol that he specifically said we should not prioritize religious minorities.

That said there was no reasoning given just the decision so it doesnt tell me anything.

Note also he mentions specific provisions. 5e 3c 5a 5c so the others should still be there.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Seattle judge blocks Trump’s immigration ban nationwide​

A federal judge in Seattle on Friday temporarily blocked President Trump’s executive order banning entry into the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries.

US District Judge James Robert, who was appointed by President George Bush in 2003, issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration's restrictions, ruling that the ban would be immediately stopped nationwide.


Within hours of the ruling, government officials told airlines to begin allowing previously barred passengers to fly, the New York Times reports. However, the White House issued a statement late Friday announcing the Department of Justice will file an emergency stay of the order.

While the federal government argues that the ban protects the country from these countries, Judge Robert said he found “no support” for those claims.

In Attorney Ferguson’s 90-page lawsuit, he claims the Trump administration is violating the Constitution’s protections for religious freedom. The state of Minnesota has also joined the state of Washington’s lawsuit which is backed by major companies including Amazon, Expedia, and several institutions of higher-education.

New York and Virginia have also taken legal action against the president'

Reacting to the complaint, White House attorneys issued a response brief, claiming that Washington state is unable to challenge the President and his intentions.

“Every President over the last 30 years has invoked this authority to suspend or impose restrictions on the entry of certain aliens or classes of aliens, in some instances including classifications based on nationality,” the brief reads, according to the Seattle Times. The brief also claims that foreign nationals do not have the constitutional right to enter the country.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/seattle-federal-judge-restraining-order-donald-trump-immigration-ban-a7562406.html

We knew it would happen... The question now is does Trump honor it or invoke a dictatorship...
Click to expand...

This judge wants to legislate from the bench. In his off time he does immigration work for refugees and is a BLM sympathizer. His block won't stand.
 
tsuke said:
hmm he says immediate and irreperable damage. Yet the ban is only 90 days. The fact that it is temporary means that it cannot be irrepairable right?

i also lol that he specifically said we should not prioritize religious minorities.

That said there was no reasoning given just the decision so it doesnt tell me anything.

Note also he mentions specific provisions. 5e 3c 5a 5c so the others should still be there.
Click to expand...

If I am allowed to cut your neck off within the next 90 days is that not irreparable?
Not sure why that should make you laugh, we shouldn't
Implied findings, look to the applicants brief and dec. Those are your reasons. These guys aren't here to satisfy you. All that matters is that the order is followed

Trump the fool has been emasculated and cucked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top