Trumps Ban Blocked By Federal Judge

B

Buckly J. Ewer

Racism Whistleblower
Seattle judge blocks Trump’s immigration ban nationwide​

A federal judge in Seattle on Friday temporarily blocked President Trump’s executive order banning entry into the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries.

US District Judge James Robert, who was appointed by President George Bush in 2003, issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration's restrictions, ruling that the ban would be immediately stopped nationwide.


Within hours of the ruling, government officials told airlines to begin allowing previously barred passengers to fly, the New York Times reports. However, the White House issued a statement late Friday announcing the Department of Justice will file an emergency stay of the order.

While the federal government argues that the ban protects the country from these countries, Judge Robert said he found “no support” for those claims.

In Attorney Ferguson’s 90-page lawsuit, he claims the Trump administration is violating the Constitution’s protections for religious freedom. The state of Minnesota has also joined the state of Washington’s lawsuit which is backed by major companies including Amazon, Expedia, and several institutions of higher-education.

New York and Virginia have also taken legal action against the president'

Reacting to the complaint, White House attorneys issued a response brief, claiming that Washington state is unable to challenge the President and his intentions.

“Every President over the last 30 years has invoked this authority to suspend or impose restrictions on the entry of certain aliens or classes of aliens, in some instances including classifications based on nationality,” the brief reads, according to the Seattle Times. The brief also claims that foreign nationals do not have the constitutional right to enter the country.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/seattle-federal-judge-restraining-order-donald-trump-immigration-ban-a7562406.html

We knew it would happen... The question now is does Trump honor it or invoke a dictatorship...
 
While the federal government argues that the ban protects the country from these countries, Judge Robert said he found “no support” for those claims.

wtf. You judge on the constitutionality of a case. If your judging based on the effectivity of a certain thing then you may as well make laws yourself!
 
The Judge was noting that the EO is ineffectual AND unconstitutional...
The EO is based solely on xenophobic bigotry coming from Flynn and Bannon...
 
Some trumptards here seem to believe the TRO applies locally only...
As with most things those trumptards are completely wrong....
Fuck you lying YaYurt...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/317884-washington-state-judge-halts-trump-immigration-ban-nationwide
 
The question now is who ordered the 60,000 visas illegally revoked...
What did the president know, and when did he know it?
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Seattle judge blocks Trump’s immigration ban nationwide​

A federal judge in Seattle on Friday temporarily blocked President Trump’s executive order banning entry into the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries.

US District Judge James Robert, who was appointed by President George Bush in 2003, issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration's restrictions, ruling that the ban would be immediately stopped nationwide.


Within hours of the ruling, government officials told airlines to begin allowing previously barred passengers to fly, the New York Times reports. However, the White House issued a statement late Friday announcing the Department of Justice will file an emergency stay of the order.

While the federal government argues that the ban protects the country from these countries, Judge Robert said he found “no support” for those claims.

In Attorney Ferguson’s 90-page lawsuit, he claims the Trump administration is violating the Constitution’s protections for religious freedom. The state of Minnesota has also joined the state of Washington’s lawsuit which is backed by major companies including Amazon, Expedia, and several institutions of higher-education.

New York and Virginia have also taken legal action against the president'

Reacting to the complaint, White House attorneys issued a response brief, claiming that Washington state is unable to challenge the President and his intentions.

“Every President over the last 30 years has invoked this authority to suspend or impose restrictions on the entry of certain aliens or classes of aliens, in some instances including classifications based on nationality,” the brief reads, according to the Seattle Times. The brief also claims that foreign nationals do not have the constitutional right to enter the country.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/seattle-federal-judge-restraining-order-donald-trump-immigration-ban-a7562406.html

We knew it would happen... The question now is does Trump honor it or invoke a dictatorship...
Click to expand...
LOL Oh well that's what happens when a President issues an executive order like he's a King. He doesn't get to make our laws and his executive orders must have standing in statutory law or the courts get to throw his order out. Poor Trumptards didn't even bother checking the Constitution let alone statutory law. Aww poor Donald doesn't get to be King and now all these yellow bellied cowards are back to looking under their beds to make sure no Muslims are hiding under it.

If it wasn't for how this impacted individual lives this would be hilarious. We're talking George W. Bush level of ineptitude.
 
It will not stand. Just an activist judge overstepping. When Gorsuch is on the Supreme Court all will be well.
 
I have to admit I didn't see this coming. where is the standing by the state AG's?
I suppose there must be some travelers from Libya to Wash state (ex.) - but it surprised me.

Robart granted a temporary restraining order after hearing arguments from Washington state and Minnesota that the president’s order unlawfully discriminated against Muslims and caused unreasonable harm.
Click to expand...
the discrimination part is obviously attempting to make this a religious test -but it's obviously not.
 
And herein we see the problems in these Unconstitutional power grabs by the judiciary.

Should a terrorist make his way into the country while a judge blocks the ban, and subsequently commits a terrorist act, *who* is accountable?

Certainly not an appointed judge, who doesn't answer to the voters. Nor any politician who appointed the judge and is no longer in office.

No, in this case they'll all point their fingers at the sitting president, whose only offense was to take strong steps to prevent the entry in the first place.
 
Taft2016 said:
And herein we see the problems in these Unconstitutional power grabs by the judiciary.

Should a terrorist make his way into the country while a judge blocks the ban, and subsequently commits a terrorist act, *who* is accountable?

Certainly not an appointed judge, who doesn't answer to the voters. Nor any politician who appointed the judge and is no longer in office.

No, in this case they'll all point their fingers at the sitting president, whose only offense was to take strong steps to prevent the entry in the first place.
Click to expand...

my biggest concern is that the court is ruling partly based on effectivity. Its one thing when they go in loops to make a constitutional argument. Its another when they scrap something for not being effective.
 
tsuke said:
my biggest concern is that the court is ruling partly based on effectivity. Its one thing when they go in loops to make a constitutional argument. Its another when they scrap something for not being effective.
Click to expand...
i did not see any ruling regarding effectivity? all I saw was harm/religious test.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
While the federal government argues that the ban protects the country from these countries, Judge Robert said he found “no support” for those claims.
Click to expand...

this idiot judge needs to be removed from the bench and have no further ability to be a judge, much less practice law. it is completely irrelevant whether the judge found 'no support' or not, it's the executive branch's authority over who can be allowed entry in to the country and who cannot, not the judiciary
 
SmarterthanYou said:
this idiot judge needs to be removed from the bench and have no further ability to be a judge, much less practice law. it is completely irrelevant whether the judge found 'no support' or not, it's the executive branch's authority over who can be allowed entry in to the country and who cannot, not the judiciary
Click to expand...

glad too see im not the only one outraged by it.
 
tsuke said:
my biggest concern is that the court is ruling partly based on effectivity. Its one thing when they go in loops to make a constitutional argument. Its another when they scrap something for not being effective.
Click to expand...

What's the constitutional reasoning? Or is there one?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
LOL Oh well that's what happens when a President issues an executive order like he's a King. He doesn't get to make our laws and his executive orders must have standing in statutory law or the courts get to throw his order out. Poor Trumptards didn't even bother checking the Constitution let alone statutory law. Aww poor Donald doesn't get to be King and now all these yellow bellied cowards are back to looking under their beds to make sure no Muslims are hiding under it.
Click to expand...
what violations of the constitution do you see Mott?.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top