TRUMPPERS, this is the question...

I never said I am certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released.

If its all been released, why does TACO, 79 not say so?

You are playing Pollyanna. I do not know what is still there that has not been released, but Blondi herself has said there is more.

While its not enough evidence for a court, there is plenty suggesting there is more.

It is solely the nature of the stacks and stacks papers that you think may exist you are speculating on then? Based on nothing at all but your wishes and "suggestion" that all Trump would need to satisfy you with is "they've already been released" statements... Gotcha.

At least I speculate based on actual past leaks and predict behavior through those actions (Past behavior is always the best predictor of the future or current behavior of others). Though, I also admit it is speculation.

I do know I will be entertained, but I also know that you are simply speculating yourself into a conspiracy theory. I believe, based on your past actions, that if Trump had said all relevant files had been released you would not believe him.
I don’t think there’s a conspiracy here, I just think Trump is doing what he can to keep the remainder of the information from the public.

It comes at all relevant files were released. I would not believe him, because he used the word relevant. What’s relevant to him is not necessarily relevant to the rest of us. Also, because he is known to be a huge liar.
 
My conclusion is that the receptionist is hoping that there is more but he will be sorely disappointed.

I agree with Damo that based on past experience, if there was more, the Dems would have leaked it.

The “got him this time” has failed.
 
My conclusion is that the receptionist is hoping that there is more but he will be sorely disappointed.

I agree with Damo that based on past experience, if there was more, the Dems would have leaked it.

The “got him this time” has failed.
We likely will never know.
 
These far left loons are salivating over…nada.
Laura Loomer is one of the people demanding their release. She's a loon, but she's one of yours.

Bongino is one of you - almost quit over this.

Alex Jones is one of you, things there's a cover-up.
A big nothing burger.
Then why stoke the scandal like they all did?
Oh, we have him…this time.

Too funny.
 
I expect there are things about you that we will never know but some things have been posted on this open forum.
But I never got elected promising to release a chunk of that information.

Its like his promise to release his taxes.
 
Poor anchovies, Brandon had four years in office with the files. Why were you alt lefties not screeching?
Amazing how MAGA misses everything

Ah, it ain’t the Democrats fighting with MAGA, it is MAGA, the conspiracy nuts in MAGA, which is most of MAGA, are the ones “screeching,” their the ones who promoted the Epstein coverup, and they are the ones who want it all in the open now, the Democrats are just encouraging and enjoying the cat fight

Too funny, not only is his attempted Biden whataboutism obvious, but his failure to even recognize what is happening in his own cult is classic
 
Amazing how MAGA misses everything

Ah, it ain’t the Democrats fighting with MAGA, it is MAGA, the conspiracy nuts in MAGA, which is most of MAGA, are the ones “screeching,” their the ones who promoted the Epstein coverup, and they are the ones who want it all in the open now, the Democrats are just encouraging and enjoying the cat fight

Too funny, not only is his attempted Biden whataboutism obvious, but his failure to even recognize what is happening in his own cult is classic
Poor anchovies, perhaps it is best if you read the OP's created right here in JPP. That might give you a picture as to who is doing the screeching.
 
Again, be specific, what exactly should he release? Not "whatever he has", tell me what documents you have actual evidence or knowledge of that have not already been published. Speculation is not evidence. When I point out that I think the highly politicized environment of the last few years would almost certainly had such information "leaked" out if it had implicated Trump, that is speculation, but it is based on past experience and what we saw leaked during that period. We even had SCOTUS rulings "leaked" when they thought it would help them beat Trump. I do not believe that if they had actual evidence of something that Trump would have escaped a "leak" or two. This is speculation... but it is based on actual circumstances and what we have seen.

When you say that you are certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released, that they can release without regard to negative impact to victims, that also contains a whole ton of evidence against Trump you are basing this on what?
You are missing the point, it is not Democrats versus Trump, it is Trump verses a segment of his own base. Trump thrived on promoting conspiracies, this one included, and now it has come back to bite him. Many of his supporters who swallowed it all now want the files out there as he promised he would do once elected. If anything, Bondi screwed it all up last February by announcing she had the Epstein lists on her desk to review

How were the Democrats going to exploit the Epstein case when it was largely over when Garland took office, Trump at that time was considered history, besides there was enough out there in facts that they didn’t need to dust off and regurgitate Epstein. And I understand it is tough for you to accept, but Garland was a straight arrow, too straight to make many Democrats happy
 
But I never got elected promising to release a chunk of that information.

Its like his promise to release his taxes.
It's hard to release what was destroyed prior to you having access to it.

The only way we're ever going to know the truth is when Maxwell starts singing.

Trump needs to pardon her in exchange for that.
 
You are missing the point, it is not Democrats versus Trump, it is Trump verses a segment of his own base. Trump thrived on promoting conspiracies, this one included, and now it has come back to bite him. Many of his supporters who swallowed it all now want the files out there as he promised he would do once elected. If anything, Bondi screwed it all up last February by announcing she had the Epstein lists on her desk to review

How were the Democrats going to exploit the Epstein case when it was largely over when Garland took office, Trump at that time was considered history, besides there was enough out there in facts that they didn’t need to dust off and regurgitate Epstein. And I understand it is tough for you to accept, but Garland was a straight arrow, too straight to make many Democrats happy
If Garland was so straight arrow why can't he answer simple questions from congress?
 
Poor anchovies, perhaps it is best if you read the OP's created right here in JPP. That might give you a picture as to who is doing the screeching.
Don’t need to, it’s all out there, Trump wasn’t referring to Democrats when he called those demanding the files “weaklings and stupid people”

As has been explained to you, Democrats are just savoring the cat fight, doing what they can to keep it going, and why wouldn’t they, it was Trump who promised he would open all the files of elected
 
I have "constructed" nothing. I wait for information. I am almost always in "wait for information" mode when investigations and courts are involved. I too shall enjoy watching. You have constructed a world in which absence of evidence means that there "must be" more evidence. This is your "look at that shiny thing I think is over there!" moment.
That works fine under normal circumstances, but not when evidence is being withheld, especially from the top.
 
I have "constructed" nothing. I wait for information. I am almost always in "wait for information" mode when investigations and courts are involved. I too shall enjoy watching. You have constructed a world in which absence of evidence means that there "must be" more evidence. This is your "look at that shiny thing I think is over there!" moment.
Why did TACO call those who called for the release, weak and stupid?
 
If Garland was so straight arrow why can't he answer simple questions from congress?

It's hard to release what was destroyed prior to you having access to it.

The only way we're ever going to know the truth is when Maxwell starts singing.

Trump needs to pardon her in exchange for that.
There are no simple questions from Congress, Congressional hearings are all show biz, full of binary and polar questions all aimed at attaining sound bites for social media and infotainment channels

Trump wouldn’t pardon Maxwell, politically, it would be very risky, and doing such would make her testimony appear bought and contrived. If MAGA really wanted all the information in those files they would make Bondi begin the process of opening all the files, but Trump isn’t going to let that happen, he then can’t control the narrative
 
Don’t need to, it’s all out there, Trump wasn’t referring to Democrats when he called those demanding the files “weaklings and stupid people”

As has been explained to you, Democrats are just savoring the cat fight, doing what they can to keep it going, and why wouldn’t they, it was Trump who promised he would open all the files of elected
Poor anchovies, the cat fight is all in your head, and cats love to eat anchovies.
 
Don’t need to, it’s all out there, Trump wasn’t referring to Democrats when he called those demanding the files “weaklings and stupid people”

As has been explained to you, Democrats are just savoring the cat fight, doing what they can to keep it going, and why wouldn’t they, it was Trump who promised he would open all the files of elected
Well, Anchovies, I am pleased as punch that you are “savoring.”

Since Democrats control nothing anymore, they can stay out of trouble while they “savor.”

The Democrats could be helping the hard working American people but they are too busy savoring.

Too funny.
 
Back
Top