You do not believe that the Republicans in congress are bullied by him?He cannot stop Congress from doing that, they are a separate branch of government.
TACO, 79, already said he would release the files... so. why does he need a preview before he decides?I do not know if the information is being kept from you. It is fair to ask if information is being kept from you, but not to assume that information exists because they are releasing this other information over there... That you (or I) are suspicious is not evidence.
I do not. I think they may act on his request, but I do not believe they are "bullied" by him.You do not believe that the Republicans in congress are bullied by him?
Hmmmmm, Lisa Murkowski claims “we are all afraid”I do not. I think they may act on his request, but I do not believe they are "bullied" by him.
Not, never was, just enjoying a MAGA conspiracy blowing up MAGAWhy are you guys all of a sudden interested in the list? You weren't for four years of Biden
That’s not true, Billy Barr investigated Epstein’s death, and his law firm defended Epstein a decade earlier, you really think Trump’s Cohen would arrest fellow Republicans
Poor anchovies, Brandon had four years in office with the files. Why were you alt lefties not screeching?That’s not true, Billy Barr investigated Epstein’s death, and his law firm defended Epstein a decade earlier, you really think Trump’s Cohen would arrest fellow Republicans
Again, be specific, what exactly should he release? Not "whatever he has", tell me what documents you have actual evidence or knowledge of that have not already been published. Speculation is not evidence. When I point out that I think the highly politicized environment of the last few years would almost certainly had such information "leaked" out if it had implicated Trump, that is speculation, but it is based on past experience and what we saw leaked during that period. We even had SCOTUS rulings "leaked" when they thought it would help them beat Trump. I do not believe that if they had actual evidence of something that Trump would have escaped a "leak" or two. This is speculation... but it is based on actual circumstances and what we have seen.TACO, 79, already said he would release the files... so. why does he need a preview before he decides?
Because she likes to cast shade, she thinks that she'll get in good with the leftists and then the Press will treat her like a friend rather than a republican.Hmmmmm, Lisa Murkowski claims “we are all afraid”
Why would she make such a claim, if they aren’t bullied?
Nonsense, she says it because it’s true.Because she likes to cast shade, she thinks that she'll get in good with the leftists and then the Press will treat her like a friend rather than a republican.
lol. I think when she uses "we" she is often standing with the Democrats rather than Republicans. She's been a hero of the left regularly for the shade she casts in Trump's direction. Her past actions are the best predictive value of her future actions and the best way to define her current actions.Nonsense, she says it because it’s true.
I never said I am certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released.Again, be specific, what exactly should he release? Not "whatever he has", tell me what documents you have actual evidence or knowledge of that have not already been published. Speculation is not evidence. When I point out that I think the highly politicized environment of the last few years would almost certainly had such information "leaked" out if it had implicated Trump, that is speculation, but it is based on past experience and what we saw leaked during that period. We even had SCOTUS rulings "leaked" when they thought it would help them beat Trump. I do not believe that if they had actual evidence of something that Trump would have escaped a "leak" or two. This is speculation... but it is based on actual circumstances and what we have seen.
When you say that you are certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released, that they can release without regard to negative impact to victims, that also contains a whole ton of evidence against Trump you are basing this on what?
I think Murkowski is more aware of what her fellow Republicans say in private than yourself.lol. I think when she uses "we" she is often standing with the Democrats rather than Republicans. She's been a hero of the left regularly for the shade she casts in Trump's direction. Her past actions are the best predictive value and the best way to define her current actions.
It is solely the nature of the stacks and stacks papers that you think may exist you are speculating on then? Based on nothing at all but your wishes and "suggestion" that all Trump would need to satisfy you with is "they've already been released" statements... Gotcha.I never said I am certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released.
If its all been released, why does TACO, 79 not say so?
You are playing Pollyanna. I do not know what is still there that has not been released, but Blondi herself has said there is more.
While its not enough evidence for a court, there is plenty suggesting there is more.
I believe that we are all aware that Murkowski says things to cast shade at Trump, and believe that Republicans are not "cowed" by Trump. Nor do I believe that she is afraid, she's already won an election while casting shade on Trump, his threats not to support her candidacy would hold no power over her.I think Murkowski is more aware of what her fellow Republicans say in private than yourself.
Lol. You believe what you wish. It’s not based on any type of fact. Murkowski is on the inside. You aren’t.I believe that we are all aware that Murkowski says things to cast shade at Trump, and believe that Republicans are not "cowed" by Trump. Nor do I believe that she is afraid, she's already won an election while casting shade on Trump, his threats would hold no power over her.
When she says this kind of thing I always take it with the knowledge that "we" isn't republicans. Shen she says "we" she includes herself and her imagination she is rarely on board with other republicans.