What if you weren't a babbling idiot?What if you were an actual lawyer? What if....
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
What if you weren't a babbling idiot?What if you were an actual lawyer? What if....
^dumb ass poster -Already proven to be a lie.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
No, you *think/hope* Trump might be a crook and you’re currently 0-1 on your ‘thinking’, thanks to Mullet.
They need to change the subject.
The Resistance is assuming everything in the full report will be detrimental to Trump. That assumption is almost certainly dubious because Mullet cleared Trump on collusion even though Mullet looked very hard for it.
So, the whole world will get to see just how wrong the left and their media minions were on collusion because all the details are in the report.
But the problem with democrats is the radicals are driving the bus and they want their pound of Trump flesh, dammit lol. These democrat newbies, along with Mad Maxine and some others, think they can impeach a president for ‘whatever’.
The best thing they could do is just forget about the whole thing and move on. But they almost certainly won’t.
We don't know, yet, what's in the report. All we have is what Trump's stooge, Barr, said was in the report. So Mueller hasn't cleared him of anything yet. You never had anything on Obama, but you're probably still convinced that he was the Devil incarnate. The same for Hillary. You never had a shred of evidence on either one, despite multiple witch hunts. There's plenty of evidence of Trump's crimes, yet you continue to deny his guilt.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Of course we know how the Trump cultists view things. If you don't unwaveringly support Trump, no matter what the actual evidence says, then you're a weasel or a traitor or they make up a name for you, like "Mullet". Equally of course, it's Trump and his cultists who are the real traitors, to the country and the Constitution.Mueller would never do that, its not his job or his mandate. His job was to produce this report and remain unbiased. He has done that. He will not spoil his position or reputation by changing that... You assume Mueller is against Trump, he is not, he is pro-law and has followed it. He would consider it a blemish if he did something to illustrate a bias or interfere with the political process in any way other than following the law.
"Special counsel Robert Mueller's team issued more than 2,800 subpoenas and executed nearly 500 search warrants in its probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election and any potential involvement by President Donald Trump's campaign.
That's according to Attorney General William Barr's letter to Congress on Sunday summarizing the findings. The special counsel employed 19 lawyers and was assisted by a team of 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants and other professional staff. The team interviewed approximately 500 witnesses."
Case closed, no collusion or evidence of obstruction.
It will also guarantee that the released report will contain nothing of value.Let Trump edit the report.
That will guarantee the report will be released.
Of course, anything that proves Trump's guilt is "covered by Executive Privilege". That's what "Executive Privilege" means in TrumpSpeak.The full report must be redacted to protect sources and methods, classified information and material covered by Executive Privilege.
This is the law, also the rules as set by the Justice Department for release of SC reports.
It is Justice's job, not Trump's. The only reason for the White House to get involved is a coverup.So why does the White House have to add its redaction.... Looks like Justice could handle that.
We don't know, yet, what's in the report. All we have is what Trump's stooge, Barr, said was in the report. So Mueller hasn't cleared him of anything yet. You never had anything on Obama, but you're probably still convinced that he was the Devil incarnate. The same for Hillary. You never had a shred of evidence on either one, despite multiple witch hunts. There's plenty of evidence of Trump's crimes, yet you continue to deny his guilt.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Of course we know how the Trump cultists view things. If you don't unwaveringly support Trump, no matter what the actual evidence says, then you're a weasel or a traitor or they make up a name for you, like "Mullet". Equally of course, it's Trump and his cultists who are the real traitors, to the country and the Constitution.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
We have yet to see the actual report. All we have is hearsay from Trump's handpicked zombie. And Trump has been leaking evidence of obstruction and collusion since well before the election. "Leaking" as from a diaper.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Of course, anything that proves Trump's guilt is "covered by Executive Privilege". That's what "Executive Privilege" means in TrumpSpeak.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
It is Justice's job, not Trump's. The only reason for the White House to get involved is a coverup.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
When was Obama the subject of such an investigation? What reports did he insist on redacting before releasing because of Executive Privilege?The White House can (Obama did it many times) claim Executive Privilege for conversations and other communications that he deems Privileged.
Get over it, you lost the election and now have lost the "collusion" war.
^^^ A good example of failed logic.It will also guarantee that the released report will contain nothing of value. Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
When was Obama the subject of such an investigation? What reports did he insist on redacting before releasing because of Executive Privilege?
you do have the right to remain silent. you fake news/ false flag fags condemn yourselves by your continual and willful, with intent of malice; seditious false testimonies. little adam shit has jumped into the fire.

You're not making any sense.Only Earl said Obama did "insist on redacting" any report before releasing, which is fail before the foundations of the world.