Did Slow Joe test negative for drugs?
Trump* showing symptoms.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Did Slow Joe test negative for drugs?
Ask a stupid question...
Prove it. And who is this "we"?
What regrettable question did you ask this time?
What Biden conspiracy theory are you pushing today?
Yakuda
Verified User
I already have. "We" are the decent non-leftist people who see you cockroaches for what you really are.
You're right, that is a stupid question.
You are forgiven.
Now, go, and sin no more.
You forgot likely drug addiction.
Decent? You're the one hurling anger filled insults at us.
As I have stated, I am sure Trump will be okay. So you can relax.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Christmas comes early to America. I couldn't think of a better Christmas present. I just hope he doesn't die so he can end up like this:
No one has ever shown medical proof that any Covid patient was in 100% glowing good health, yet 2 days later they were dead from it.
Mainly family members said things like that who had little or no knowledge of the deceased's real blood sugar, white blood cell counts,
vascular condition, recent check-up results for lungs, spleen, liver, etc. This was information which was more than likely revealed to
the family weeks later by autopsies or medical files.
You're right, that is a stupid question.
You are forgiven.
Now, go, and sin no more.
How would a drug like Adderall affect someone’s debate performances?
Michael T. Swanoski: Adderall is a stimulant that’s often prescribed for attention deficit disorder. So Adderall potentially could increase your attentiveness if you’re feeling drowsy or if you’re fatigued. But it doesn’t increase cognition per se. It doesn’t improve thinking, but it provides a boost similar to what you’d get from a cup of coffee—a little more pronounced, but not increasing cognition in any way. It wouldn’t have an effect on your acetylcholine, which is the chemical that’s connected with clear thoughts, thinking through a difficult task, and high-level thinking.
Trump seems to be implying that there’s a drug that could magically make someone who was frail and confused into a brilliant debater. Is that possible?
Michael T. Swanoski: Inherently your talents in debating are not going to suddenly be enhanced because you took a nutritional supplement or you took a prescription stimulant. The best they can do is maybe make you more alert. They’re not going to suddenly increase your intelligence. That’s just not possible.
Giuliani also said “the president’s quite right to say maybe [Biden has] taken Adderall,” implying it would be a treatment for his supposed “sleepiness.”
Michael T. Swanoski: Dementia is not lack of energy; there’s damage going on in the brain. There’s neural damage that occurs that then impairs the function of these neural transmitters, these chemicals like acetylcholine, which is this chemical that’s really responsible in large part for our normal cognitive function. And so someone with dementia would not be treated with amphetamines to get them more alert. It wouldn’t increase their brain acuity at all. It would make them jittery, more confused, really, because they wouldn’t be able to think clearly. Drugs for dementia are primarily aimed at increasing levels of acetylcholine, like Donepezil, which is used for Alzheimer’s dementia.
So just to be clear, you’re saying that Adderall is not a treatment for dementia?
Michael T. Swanoski: You are correct.
https://slate.com/technology/2020/09/joe-biden-drug-test-trump-adderall-debunk.html
Another one, so soon?
What's Adderall got to do with me?
Predictable deflection. If you stopped with the knee-jerk responses and actually had the self-discipline to read the full article, you'd see everything I posted came from it.
"Did Slow Joe test negative for drugs?"
And don't even try one of those BS comments that you never mentioned a drug by name in that particular post.
Relax. Testing positive for the Wu Flu is not a death sentence.
Even the failing NYT admits that the test labs overcooked the sensitivity rate to produce false positives.
The failing NY Times admits that up to 90 percent of the people who receive a positive test are carrying so little virus that they probably aren’t contagious.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Even if symptoms manifest, the prognosis is excellent.