Trump Policies Sent U.S. Tumbling in a Climate Ranking

signalmankenneth

Verified User
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!

For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.

A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.

But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.

The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.

Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.

The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.

“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.

A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html

trump_climate_change_denial__steve_greenberg.jpg



climate28s.jpg
 
Would you please post a test ,using SCIENTIFIC METHOD, proving the THERMAL RETENTION PROPERTIES OF .0004 atmospheric concentrations of CO2 ??

Not some bullshit Climatista OPINION PIECE making UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS.


AN ACTUAL CHEMICAL/THERMAL TEST....doing what I specified.
 
Last edited:
Who cares? Gorebal Warming is bullshit. Climate change happens, but not for the reasons the Left is pandering...

_vpUa.qR4e-small-AOCs-says-world-will-end-in.jpg


We have about 8 years left then we all die, at least according to the likes of AOC...
 
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water

Void argument fallacy.
and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!?
What droughts?
Which forest fires? You mean the ones in New Mexico started by the U.S. Forest service in accordance with Biden's policies? Or do you mean the ones started by arsonists in the SDTC?
What floods?
What heat wave?
It not only here but world-wide too?!!
There is no such thing as global weather.
[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level.

Buzzword fallacy. There is not value associated with climate. It cannot change. There is no global climate. You are using this as a synonym to global warming, a fundamentalist style religion. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
What race?
[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries

Made up shit means nothing, even if it comes from Yale or Columbia. Argument from randU fallacy.
— a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
Squandered what?
[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient.

No such thing as 'greenhouse gas'. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are STILL ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
The report’s sobering bottom line is that,
Fuck the report. It means nothing. It is religious text.
while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere),
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
almost none are on track to do it.
Who defines this 'track'? You? On what basis? No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.

Buzzword fallacy. There is no 'sustainable path', since there is no 'path', and no problem. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.

Fuck your fictional 'track'. I despise the fascism you are proposing.
 
Top evince's Avatar evince evince is online now
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
155,502
Thanks
52,267
Thanked 27,326 Times in 21,054 PostsGroans25Groaned 19,030 Times in 17,639 PostsBlog Entries9
Default science proves human effected GW
https://www.nationalobserver.com/201...tarctic-waters


For the first time, scientists prove human activity is the top cause of warming Antarctic waters
By Kelsey Litwin in News, Energy, Politics | September 25th 2018
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm[/
 
Would you please post a test ,using SCIENTIFIC METHOD, proving the THERMAL RETENTION PROPERTIES OF .0004 atmospheric concentrations of CO2 ??

Not some bullshit Climatista OPINION PIECE making UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS.


AN ACTUAL CHEMICAL/THERMAL TEST....doing what I specified.

Zero.
The 1st law of thermodynamics states: E(t+1) = E(t) - U where 'E' is energy, 't' is time, and 'U' is work.
A gas or vapor is not work. Therefore, E(t+1) = E(t). No gas or vapor can create energy out of nothing. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

The 2nd law of thermodynamics states: e(t+1) >= e(t) where 'e' is entropy (the random distribution in a system (this can be the uniform distribution of energy), and 't' is time. In other words, entropy must always increase or stay the same. It can never decrease. No gas or vapor has the capability to heat an already warmer surface.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law states: E = C*e*t^4 where 'E' is energy radiated as light in watts per square area, 'C' is a natural constant (serving to convert the relation to our units of measurement), 'e' is emissivity, or how well the radiating surface absorbs or emits light as opposed to transparency or reflections and is expressed as a percentage, with '1' being an ideal black body (none exist in nature) and '0' being an ideal white body (none exist in nature); and 't' is temperature in degK.

In other words:
* you cannot create energy out of nothing.
* you cannot block heat.
* you cannot heat an already warmer surface using a colder gas or vapor.
* you cannot block light.
* you cannot block thermal energy. There is always heat.

No gas or vapor can cancel or overrule these theories of science. .The Church of Global Warming simply discards these theories of science (and science itself).

Science is not a method or a procedure. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
No test has been found to falsify the 1st or 2nd laws of thermodynamics or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.


This is the science the Church of Global Warming discards.
 
Who cares? Gorebal Warming is bullshit. Climate change happens, but not for the reasons the Left is pandering...

_vpUa.qR4e-small-AOCs-says-world-will-end-in.jpg


We have about 8 years left then we all die, at least according to the likes of AOC...

Climate has no value associated with it. What is changing?
There is no such thing as a global climate.
 
Top evince's Avatar evince evince is online now
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
155,502
Thanks
52,267
Thanked 27,326 Times in 21,054 PostsGroans25Groaned 19,030 Times in 17,639 PostsBlog Entries9
Default science proves human effected GW
https://www.nationalobserver.com/201...tarctic-waters


For the first time, scientists prove human activity is the top cause of warming Antarctic waters
By Kelsey Litwin in News, Energy, Politics | September 25th 2018
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/.... Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
 
Mr Mac taught that it is our duty to figure out when we are being lied to, and to do something about it, for the kids if we will not do it for ourselves.

It is either that or we have tyranny, we become enslaved.

I learned this as a HS Freshman.

When did you?

Did U?
 
Back
Top