Trump: No Wall No DACA

Bourbon said:
I was in the Orlando Airport this weekend and I met a Puerto Rican family moving to The States ... we got to talking and they made it clear, the first thing they're doing after establishing residency ... is to Register as Democrats to Vote against The Republican Party and against Drumpf.
Click to expand...

That's funny; because I was also at the Orlando Airport this weekend and I met Puerto Rican family that was moving to the States.
We were talking and they started laughing of how they told this possibly insane person, who kept asking them if they hated Trump and loved the DNC, that they were going to register as Democrats, just so he would leave them alone.

:truestory:
 
Frank Apisa said:
Okay...if you want to use population of the state registered to vote:

Wyoming has 284,000 registered voters...California has 18,200,000 registered voters.

Still ends up that instead of 55 electoral votes...California should have close to 200 in order for it to be fair.
Click to expand...

one vote for 284,000 means 64 votes for 18,200,000.....not 200.....
 
Frank Apisa said:
Hello, hello...calling PostmodernProphet.

I am not talking about how it was set up.

I am talking about how it is NOW.

Jees!
Click to expand...

hey dumbfuck......you're talking about WHY it was set up, it wasn't set up to favor any particular party.......it WAS set up to keep highly populated states from dominating elections.......in other words, it is working exactly the way it was intended to.....
 
Getin the ring said:
no, and even worse is Dems want the illegal parents who brought the illegal kids to be able to stay also. In-other words they want NO rules, you get here, hook or crook, jump the fence, sneak in, overstay a visa, whatever, you're in, Welcome.

it's just sad
Click to expand...

To Dems, the ends justify the means even if the means is an illegal act.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
hey dumbfuck......you're talking about WHY it was set up, it wasn't set up to favor any particular party.......it WAS set up to keep highly populated states from dominating elections.......in other words, it is working exactly the way it was intended to.....
Click to expand...

I am not talking about why it was set up. I am talking about how it effects things today.

It IS working exactly as it was intended...and it is having an unfair effect today. Some incompetent jerk can come along TODAY...and win the presidency while losing the popular vote by millions.

Try to keep up.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yeah we're already clear on the fact you don't realize you're an idiot for bringing it up......
Click to expand...

I am not an idiot...nor a "dumbfuck" as you used in your last post. But I understand that children must act and speak that way...so continue. In any case, I am not an idiot...so I cannot be "the idiot" who brought it up.
 
Frank Apisa said:
It is 3 votes for every 284,000 voters in Wyoming...why should it be only 1 for for every 284,000 in California?

Hummm?
Click to expand...
its two votes for every state.......
its one vote for every 500,000 people....the government has not yet figured out how to animate a half person, so one is the minimum......
why do you ignore the constitution?.....
 
Frank Apisa said:
I am not talking about why it was set up. I am talking about how it effects things today.

It IS working exactly as it was intended...and it is having an unfair effect today. Some incompetent jerk can come along TODAY...and win the presidency while losing the popular vote by millions.

.
Click to expand...
you posted this.......why do you pretend you aren't an idiot?....since this was the exact effect intended and the founders did not create an unfair effect, it cannot be having an unfair effect.....at worst, it has an effect you don't desire.....since it at other times may have an effect that I do not desire, or any other person in the country might not desire, it by definition would be a fair effect.........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
its two votes for every state.......
its one vote for every 500,000 people....the government has not yet figured out how to animate a half person, so one is the minimum......
why do you ignore the constitution?.....
Click to expand...

I do not "ignore" the Constitution...and I properly capitalize it when mentioning it.

The people of Wyoming...whether using the population or the registered voters numbers...get 3 votes in the EC. How that 3 is derived is not germane.

The people of California get 55.

The people of California are getting short changed. It is legal; it is constitutional...but it is unfair nonetheless.

Sorry this is causing you such distress.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you posted this.......why do you pretend you aren't an idiot?....since this was the exact effect intended and the founders did not create an unfair effect, it cannot be having an unfair effect.....at worst, it has an effect you don't desire.....since it at other times may have an effect that I do not desire, or any other person in the country might not desire, it by definition would be a fair effect.........
Click to expand...

I am not an idiot. Try to be adult...or at least, try to act adult. Your acting skills may be up to the job.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I am not an idiot...nor a "dumbfuck" as you used in your last post.
Click to expand...


actually there is a better than 50/50 chance both are true, agreed we don't totally know you well enough to conclude.
BUT
based on your assertion that California and New York should be allowed to pick our president kind of puts you in harms way in regard.

And on topic, trump is working his magic, like I told you months ago he set Democrats up, and they bit. HE WINS.

There will be a wall, there will be an end to chain migration, and sanctuary cities will be a thing of the past. Dreamers. or illegals as they should be referred to will get a path, and they will have Trump to thank for it.
Is this WINNING getting more clear as time passes? you liberal loons
 
The whole premise behind DACA is absurd.

So an illegal parent brings an illegal child, or has an illegal child in the US.
So illegal child is therefore allowed to stay.
You can not separate illegal child from illegal parent so therefore illegal parent is allowed to stay.

So "bring a child you're in" is our immigration policy, that should work well huh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top