Trump news conference performance 'nothing short of treasonous'

a9ca9204df84d2444768beb7f6e3aed5.jpg
 
Evidence? Give it a rest Woke.

So run down that evidence of Obama conspiring with Putin in the last election -- I'll wait

Then, tell me why hasn't Obama been indicted yet? if you say because Obama is too powerful to be indicted, slap yourself to sleep
 
I remember when conservatives claimed Obamacare was treason....

...then they claim Obama giving his wife a fist bump was possible treason..

...then they claim his utter existence was also treason because he was a Manchurian candidate cultivated by Russia

...and who can forget the non-apology -- apology tour that conservatives claimed was treason -- in which he NEVER blamed the United States for the cold war

Yes, I remember that also. Both sides use exaggerated hyperbole to attack the other side and neither have any idea of the meaning of treason.
 
Yes, I remember that also. Both sides use exaggerated hyperbole to attack the other side and neither have any idea of the meaning of treason.
Former CIA director John Brennan, who frequently blasts Trump, tweeted: "Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of 'high crimes & misdemeanors.' It was nothing short of treasonous."
 
That may very well be true, but it was certainly NEVER what the Founders intended.

By giving the House the power to impeach they clearly made it a political decision. High crimes and misdemeanors is obviously a vague term. It does not refer strictly to legally defined crimes because that is an issue for the courts.

What did they intend?
 
Former CIA director John Brennan, who frequently blasts Trump, tweeted: "Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of 'high crimes & misdemeanors.' It was nothing short of treasonous."

Yes, I understand that is his opinion. That does not make it treason, but it got him media coverage. I don't think anybody could commit treason in a speech.
 
Lying under oath about an affair in the midst of a special investigation that was meant to investigate a land deal was enough to reach the high crimes and misdemeanor threshold --- which is now why Trump and his supporters have no intentions of him being questioned under oath -- and now they admit Clinton should have never done it either --- they can freely admit this since its been years ago -- so they don't mind you knowing how full of shit they are now...
 
Hello guno,

"Trump news conference performance 'nothing short of treasonous' "

Totally agree.

Come on PoliTalker, you know better than that. Don't confuse political opposition to his statement with a crime.

What element(s) of treason did he commit? [watch, somebody will accuse me of defending Trump rather than the law]
 
Has the left found a release of the private conversation between Trump & Putin or something? Do they know what Trump told him there?
 
CIA officer turned GOP lawmaker is stunned to see the president being manipulated by Russia

“I’ve seen Russian intelligence manipulate many people over my professional career and I never would have thought that the US President would become one of the ones getting played by old KGB hands.”
- Will Hurd (R-Texas)
 
By giving the House the power to impeach they clearly made it a political decision. High crimes and misdemeanors is obviously a vague term. It does not refer strictly to legally defined crimes because that is an issue for the courts.

What did they intend?

It's not a vague term at all you leftist loon, historical revisionist.
 
Poor idiotic Trump supporters.

Deeper and deeper.

Offer them some water...so they do not stop digging.

attachment.php
 
I don't believe there is any thing the POTUS can do to shake his base. I cannot believe even the evangelicals are solidly behind him. It's just weird...
Poor idiotic Trump supporters.

Deeper and deeper.

Offer them some water...so they do not stop digging.

attachment.php
 
It's not a vague term at all you leftist loon, historical revisionist.

People usually resort to insults when they lack real information. Be nice.

If the words are so clear, explain them to me. Does misdemeanors mean all misdemeanors--traffic ticket, jaywalking, disorderly conduct, public drunkenness? Does it apply to just federal misdemeanors or also state and local crimes? Does high crimes mean felony? Can the president only be impeached for criminal offenses? What was the original intent?

What does the interpretation of that clause have to do with being leftist or revisionist?
 
I don't believe there is any thing the POTUS can do to shake his base. I cannot believe even the evangelicals are solidly behind him. It's just weird...

"Weird" barely covers it!

I truly am now more concerned with Trump supporters than with Donald Trump.

He can be handled.

They are more dangerous.
 
People usually resort to insults when they lack real information. Be nice.

If the words are so clear, explain them to me. Does misdemeanors mean all misdemeanors--traffic ticket, jaywalking, disorderly conduct, public drunkenness? Does it apply to just federal misdemeanors or also state and local crimes? Does high crimes mean felony? Can the president only be impeached for criminal offenses? What was the original intent?

What does the interpretation of that clause have to do with being leftist or revisionist?

And people usually resort to nonsensical talking points when they have nothing. Do you admonish your fellow travelers so when they refer to Trump supporters as racists and Nazis? Of course you don't.

If you want to know what the founder's intentions were, simply read what they wrote on the subject. It's not my job to educate you. Suffice it to say, they never intended impeachment to be easy, and utized with some vague trumped up nonsense. No pun intended.
 
And people usually resort to nonsensical talking points when they have nothing. Do you admonish your fellow travelers so when they refer to Trump supporters as racists and Nazis? Of course you don't.

If you want to know what the founder's intentions were, simply read what they wrote on the subject. It's not my job to educate you. Suffice it to say, they never intended impeachment to be easy, and utized with some vague trumped up nonsense. No pun intended.

Read the posts. I have called out people for making the Nazi/Hitler comparison as ridiculous. If you simply read the posts on this thread you will see I called the treason charges crazy.

I have read about impeachment and explained some things and you called me a "leftist" and "revisionist" but could not explain what was wrong with my statements. Nowhere did I say impeachment was easy. You try to put everybody in liberal/conservative categories without knowledge of what they are stating. Labeling somebody as liberal or conservative does not mean you have won the argument.

What was wrong with my statement about impeachment--show us your knowledge. What "talking point" are you referring to?
 
Back
Top