Trump mocks Elizabeth Warren as 'Pocahontas' in front of Native American leaders

so you havent the capability to comprehend what you read? gotcha. goom bye dufus.

You fucking little weasel. Anyone that reads it immediately knows you are full of shit and just yammering like a bitch. That is no way to go through life son.
 
those making a claim have to back up their claim, or it's unsupported..

Anatta seems to get it. It's an unsupported claim - but not a lie.

But, the irony of that kind of argument being made w/ such passion from a group of TRUMP SUPPORTERS. I mean, this thread is crazy.
 
I dont think its been out for 5 years. Regardless of how often you say it has.

I don't care what you think Garod, we all know thinking isn't your strong suit. Clearly reading comprehension isn't either. It states clearly in the link I provided that the Boston Globe reported all of this in 2012.
 
Roy Moore claims he did not try to fuck a 14 year old when he was in his 30's... If he cant prove it... using your logic... it must be true.

You understand that a negative cannot ever be proven? Heritage most certainly CAN be. To be comparing Moore to Warren, you would have to put the woman and Warren in the same position. They made claims, it is up to them to show evidence. In the case of Moore, given the number of other women, it would appear he had a history of trying to date young teens, which adds validity to her claim. In the case of Warren, she clearly lied about the issue.
 
Roy Moore answered to claims made about him. It's on the then 14 year old to prove it happened. Even though she can't, you still believe it.


Elizabeth Warren answered the claims made about her. Its on those claiming she was lying to prove she was. Even though you can't, you still believe it.
 
You understand that a negative cannot ever be proven? Heritage most certainly CAN be. To be comparing Moore to Warren, you would have to put the woman and Warren in the same position. They made claims, it is up to them to show evidence. In the case of Moore, given the number of other women, it would appear he had a history of trying to date young teens, which adds validity to her claim. In the case of Warren, she clearly lied about the issue.

Exactly.
 
I have. She has provided no evidence to back a claim she knowingly made.

I've met the rules.

Rump knowingly claimed the women he harassed were lying, he has no evidence to back a claim he knowingly made.
 
If she has no proof that's it's true, it's all the proof I need.

I don't think you understand what a lie is. You understand what it is to be an Obama n-lover, though. Now that you've had your black guy, the next thing you want is a native American, or at least one that will claim she is.

If Roy Moore has no proof its not true about the 14 year old girl, its all the proof I need.
 
When I was an infant, I peed in Jimmy Carters bed at the Georgia Governors Mansion, My parents told me about it. I dont remember.

If I say it happened, am I lying?
 
You understand that a negative cannot ever be proven? Heritage most certainly CAN be. To be comparing Moore to Warren, you would have to put the woman and Warren in the same position. They made claims, it is up to them to show evidence. In the case of Moore, given the number of other women, it would appear he had a history of trying to date young teens, which adds validity to her claim. In the case of Warren, she clearly lied about the issue.

I understand your logic, but I was using his logic to show how ridiculous his argument was, thanks for helping.

How can you say she lied, when you dont know the truth.
 
Elizabeth Warren answered the claims made about her. Its on those claiming she was lying to prove she was. Even though you can't, you still believe it.

If she can't prove a claim she made but knowingly made the claim, it's a lie. All the proof has been provided she's lying. Funny thing is she provided the proof for me by not providing proof of what she said.
 
Rump knowingly claimed the women he harassed were lying, he has no evidence to back a claim he knowingly made.

Unless those women have proof he did, they were lying and the claims they made he harassed them are false.
 
If Roy Moore has no proof its not true about the 14 year old girl, its all the proof I need.

Roy Moore doesn't have to disprove a claim made about him. Unless the one making it can prove it, her claim disproves itself.

If you have no proof you don't kiss Obama's black ass, I have all the proof I need you're nothing more than a NL.
 
Back
Top