Trump met with Russian Ambassador during campaign

domer76 said:
lol

A signature is included in EVERY post, idiot. You do know what the word 'included' means, don't you? Or do you wish to take a poll to find out?
Click to expand...
No they are not. Like I said, you can turn off sigs and still see posts.

And having something in a significant is not mentioning it in every post. Sigs are separate stupid. And simply keeping a sign is like an avatar, just because I have an avatar doesn't mean I mention it in every post.

You make Rune look almost intelligent.
 
domer76 said:
Congrats. You just publically proved your inability to read.

Fucking idiot replying to the wrong person the entire time. lol I'm embarrassed for you.
Click to expand...
Lol, you two idiots say the same crap and I didn't even look at the name.

But yeah, if you really want to use that little mistake as I can't read, then have at it. Makes you look stupid.
 
Yaya said:
Didn't need the bold to answer Franken's question.



Meeting with him in his role as Senator is not being affiliated or a surrogate for Trump and therefore is not in the course of the campaign.

I can't fix your stupid. It is in plain English, you're just hysterical and refuse to admit it. Why would he have to REPEAT what Franken asked? Franken asked him what you want Sessions to have put in his answer. That is not necessary. He answered the question truthfully and when he clarified, he said it was in his official role. What more do you want?

You're barking mad.
Click to expand...


Your momma obviously could not fix "Stupid" either.

"In the course of the campaign" means "during the period of the campaign." You are full of shit and and spinning madly.

Where did he use the words "in his official role" during the confirmation.
 
Yaya said:
during the campaign vs. during the course of the campaign
Click to expand...

The words "the course of" are superfluous in the latter.

http://grammarist.com/usage/during-the-course-of/

During the course of


During the course of is wordy for during. It’s slightly different from in the course of, which is often replaceable with other prepositions like in, over, and while. And while during is usually the best replacement for during the course of, in and on are sometimes better.

The sentences mean the same thing.

You can't have rational discussions while you are lying through your teeth.
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
And you claim you didn't say what he should have said. Lmao, right there on your post.

You're either a liar or a retard, which is it?
Click to expand...


Looks like you are disoriented again. No wonder you can't understand what really was asked and answered.

BTW, warrant means justify in the context of thing's sentence. Other than the the typo (I assume "every" was supposed to be "ever") there is nothing wrong with the sentence. Why is it in your quote?
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Looks like you are disoriented again. No wonder you can't understand what really was asked and answered.

BTW, warrant means justify in the context of thing's sentence. Other than the the typo (I assume "every" was supposed to be "ever") there is nothing wrong with the sentence. Why is it in your quote?
Click to expand...

Hey, domer76. Glad you could take over for me, Dick from the Internet, this morning. I got weary responding to this tard last night.
 
See what I mean, you guys sound the same and think the same.

Easy to confuse you two when I'm talking to both of you because you both are stupid beyond belief and say the same things.

But please, keep this up, I'm glad my little mistake is providing such huge entertainment for you two, it is obvious how much you need it.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Looks like you are disoriented again. No wonder you can't understand what really was asked and answered.

BTW, warrant means justify in the context of thing's sentence. Other than the the typo (I assume "every" was supposed to be "ever") there is nothing wrong with the sentence. Why is it in your quote?
Click to expand...

Oh look who keeps bringing up warranted. Just like Domer. You both talk about it more than I do. And I bet Queen Snowflake never says a word to you guys.

:rofl2:
 
Yaya said:
Oh look who keeps bringing up warranted. Just like Domer. You both talk about it more than I do. And I bet Queen Snowflake never says a word to you guys.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

lol

Math is also difficult for you. Let's point out this simple fact, AGAIN.

Your signature line brings up "warranted" in your EVERY post. Now, tard, in my book, that's 100% of your posts. Impossible to exceed that, Einstein.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Donald Trump has claimed repeatedly that he has had no contact with Russian officials as a presidential candidate.

He was lying.

Trump personally met with the Russian ambassador on April 27, 2016, prior to a major foreign policy speech. The Wall Street Journal, in a report that was little-noticed at the time but was recently picked up by AMERICABlog News, reported the meeting last year.

A few minutes before he made those remarks, Mr. Trump met at a VIP reception with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Ivanovich Kislyak. Mr. Trump warmly greeted Mr. Kislyak and three other foreign ambassadors who came to the reception.​

Kislyak, according to multiple contemporaneous news reports, was seated in the front row. It was an invitation-only event.
A photo from AFP captures Kislyak taking his seat.


Russian ambassador Kislyak (far right) takes his seat with former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker

Trump used the speech to call for warmer relations with Russia. “I believe an easing of tensions, and improved relations with Russia — from a position of strength only — is possible, absolutely possible,” Trump said. “Some say the Russians won’t be reasonable. I intend to find out.”

Russia was pleased with his speech: http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/28/politics/donald-trump-russia-putin/


Trump has repeatedly insisted that neither he nor anyone on his campaign was in contact with Russia during the election.


“Russia is a ruse. I have nothing to do with Russia. Haven’t made a phone call to Russia in years. Don’t speak to people from Russia,” Trump said during a February 16 press conference. He said he contacts with Russia were limited to talking twice to Vladimir Putin after election day.

On February 20, Trump spokesperson Sarah Sanders flatly declared that the Trump campaign had “no contacts” with Russia.

We’ve since learned that at least four members of the Trump campaign — Jeff Sessions, Michael Flynn, Carter Page, and J.D. Gordon — talked with Russian officials during the campaign.

Sessions, now the Attorney General, recused himself from any investigation of the Trump campaigns contacts with Russia after he falsely told the Judiciary Committee he had not met with any Russian officials.

Trump’s own meeting with Kislyak raises further questions about the nature of the Trump campaign’s relationship with Russia and why the Trump administration won’t come clean about the extent of their contacts.


https://thinkprogress.org/trump-per...sador-during-campaign-cc59ae305032#.595p0vhpw
Click to expand...

Has anybody NOT met with this Russian guy???? :palm:
 
domer76 said:
lol

Math is also difficult for you. Let's point out this simple fact, AGAIN.

Your signature line brings up "warranted" in your EVERY post. Now, tard, in my book, that's 100% of your posts. Impossible to exceed that, Einstein.
Click to expand...

You really are dense. Sigs are not part of a post, they can be turned off moron. What I am writing now is my post. Not my signature.

But I do note you answered for Dick and you post just like him. So easy to confuse you two idiots.
 
Yaya said:
Oh look who keeps bringing up warranted. Just like Domer. You both talk about it more than I do. And I bet Queen Snowflake never says a word to you guys.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...


LOL, you are paranoid and overestimate your importance. I just checked, it's been over three years since QS has sent me a private message.

It seems you are trying to walk away from your comprehension problems.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
If you can't read then how I am going to communicate it to you?


A few minutes before he made those remarks, Mr. Trump met at a VIP reception with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Ivanovich Kislyak. Mr. Trump warmly greeted Mr. Kislyak and three other foreign ambassadors who came to the reception.

He was giving a speech about relations with Russia.
Click to expand...

So saying "hi" is the same as having a clandestine meeting to cheat Hillary?

Yeah run with that
 
Yaya said:
You really are dense. Sigs are not part of a post, they can be turned off moron. What I am writing now is my post. Not my signature.

But I do note you answered for Dick and you post just like him. So easy to confuse you two idiots.
Click to expand...

Wow! Not part of a post? Then why do I keep seeing the word 'warranted' in every one of your posts? Is it not really there?

When you write a letter, moron, and sign it, your signature is NOT part of the letter?

Can I offer some friendly advice? Before you continue to embarrass yourself on this forum, take some time off and gather yourself. Lacking that, which I'm sure will be the case, actually THINK for a few seconds before you hit the 'post' button. I doubt that will occur, too, but just some advice to keep us from laughing at you.
 
domer76 said:
Wow! Not part of a post? Then why do I keep seeing the word 'warranted' in every one of your posts? Is it not really there?

When you write a letter, moron, and sign it, your signature is NOT part of the letter?

Can I offer some friendly advice? Before you continue to embarrass yourself on this forum, take some time off and gather yourself. Lacking that, which I'm sure will be the case, actually THINK for a few seconds before you hit the 'post' button. I doubt that will occur, too, but just some advice to keep us from laughing at you.
Click to expand...

Turn sigs off, do you still see the post?

And comparing forum sigs, which no one "signs", just shows how stupid you are.
 
Yaya said:
Turn sigs off, do you still see the post?

And comparing forum sigs, which no one "signs", just shows how stupid you are.
Click to expand...

(laughing)

It's called a signature, why?

Damn, you are a dense motherfucker! Stubborn and stupid. Bad combination, Flaccid Jack!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top