Trump met with Russian Ambassador during campaign

You are adding things to the word "meeting" that are not necessary. But nobody said they had a "meeting," you fucking moron. The claim is that, "they met."


Meeting - a coming together of two or more people, by chance or arrangement.
Now you are venturing into Nostradumbarse territory, good luck with that.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
My goodness you are dumb. In the course of, means in his work in the campaign, not during the campaign. There is a huge difference. In the course of, means while he was working for or doing something for the campaign.


Yeah, you redefined the phrase, you lying moron. "In the course of" simply means during. He met with Kysliak during the campaign. Sessions did not qualify his statement.
 
Now you are venturing into Nostradumbarse territory, good luck with that.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists


Fuck you and you non response, coward. He met the man. That's all that was claimed and that has been shown to have happened.
 
Yeah, you redefined the phrase, you lying moron. "In the course of" simply means during. He met with Kysliak during the campaign. Sessions did not qualify his statement.

I tire of arguing such a simple point with you. Did you meet him during the course of the campaign, means during his work. What difference would it make if he met him OUTSIDE of the course of the campaign? NONE.

You're such a freaking moron.
 
I tire of arguing such a simple point with you. Did you meet him during the course of the campaign, means during his work. What difference would it make if he met him OUTSIDE of the course of the campaign? NONE.

You're such a freaking moron.

No, it means during the specified time period covered by the campaign, you spinning sack of shit. Sessions should have qualified his statement. He should have said...



“I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians in the service of the campaign, and I’m unable to comment on it.”

He left out the bold.
 
No, it means during the specified time period covered by the campaign, you spinning sack of shit. Sessions should have qualified his statement. He should have said...



“I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians in the service of the campaign, and I’m unable to comment on it.”

He left out the bold.

Didn't need the bold to answer Franken's question.

'there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.'

Again, I'm telling you this is just coming out, so, you know. But, if it's true it's obviously extremely serious. And if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Meeting with him in his role as Senator is not being affiliated or a surrogate for Trump and therefore is not in the course of the campaign.

I can't fix your stupid. It is in plain English, you're just hysterical and refuse to admit it. Why would he have to REPEAT what Franken asked? Franken asked him what you want Sessions to have put in his answer. That is not necessary. He answered the question truthfully and when he clarified, he said it was in his official role. What more do you want?

You're barking mad.
 
I tire of arguing such a simple point with you. Did you meet him during the course of the campaign, means during his work. What difference would it make if he met him OUTSIDE of the course of the campaign? NONE.

You're such a freaking moron.

English must be a second language for you. You certainly fuck up the true meanings of words. First, 'warrant'. Now you fuck up 'in the course of'. It means 'during.', moron.
 
English must be a second language for you. You certainly fuck up the true e meanings of words. First, 'warrant'. Now you fuck up 'in the course of'. It means 'during.', moron.

Looks who keeps talking about warranted. I was right then and I am right now. I have proved it, you have failed to grasp English.

Take a remedial course and ask them about context. For you to claim that he simply meant during the campaign vs. during the course of the campaign (while he was working or affiliated or as a surrogate) is the height of dishonesty. Franken clearly says surrogate, affiliated, then during the course of....meaning, while working for the campaign.

You can't even have rational discussions with liberals anymore. The hysteria is fanatical.
 
Looks who keeps talking about warranted. I was right then and I am right now. I have proved it, you have failed to grasp English.

Take a remedial course and ask them about context. For you to claim that he simply meant during the campaign vs. during the course of the campaign (while he was working or affiliated or as a surrogate) is the height of dishonesty. Franken clearly says surrogate, affiliated, then during the course of....meaning, while working for the campaign.

You can't even have rational discussions with liberals anymore. The hysteria is fanatical.

You fucking idiot. You mention 'warranted', highlighted, in your every post. So you can take that claim and shove it in your anal cavity.

I've seen the question and I've seen the answer several times. There is a thing called 'lying by omission'. That's what Sessions did. But, thanks for proving that 'in the course' means during. That's my point.

Sessions wasn't in Cleveland as a representative of the Armed Services Committee. His trip was paid for by his own campaign funds. He was still an active surrogate for Trump, anyway.

Illiterate Trumptard.
 
English must be a second language for you. You certainly fuck up the true meanings of words. First, 'warrant'. Now you fuck up 'in the course of'. It means 'during.', moron.
Such an angry man, you should go on a course of lithium.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
I never mentioned warranted in my post, liar.

Your last paragraph is a total lie. You even said he should have said he was not with the campaign to be truthful. Now that you lost that, you dishonestly move the goal posts.

Snore.
 
Such an angry man, you should go on a course of lithium.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists

lol

I do this for amusement, dbag.

Hey, speaking of amusement, can you post another link to that crazy, adjunct professor in Women's Studies from a third rate university somewhere in New Jersey? That was a real knee-slapper!
 
I never mentioned warranted in my post, liar.

Your last paragraph is a total lie. You even said he should have said he was not with the campaign to be truthful. Now that you lost that, you dishonestly move the goal posts.

Snore.

lol

You lack such self-awareness, I am embarrassed for you. Are you so dense as to be unaware of the contents of your own signature line?

Don't put words in my mouth, liar. Or are you merely that reading challenged? I never said he 'should have' anything. I deal in reality. The reality is he lied by omission.
 
English must be a second language for you. You certainly fuck up the true meanings of words. First, 'warrant'. Now you fuck up 'in the course of'. It means 'during.', moron.
Such an angry man, you should go on a course of lithium.
lol

I do this for amusement, dbag.

Hey, speaking of amusement, can you post another link to that crazy, adjunct professor in Women's Studies from a third rate university somewhere in New Jersey? That was a real knee-slapper!
Yes I can post many links, I can also tell you that you're a deranged cunt who is not worth the time of day. Anyway I am off to look at some land here in Udon Thani, so have a nice day!!

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
lol

You lack such self-awareness, I am embarrassed for you. Are you so dense as to be unaware of the contents of your own signature line?

Don't put words in my mouth, liar. Or are you merely that reading challenged? I never said he 'should have' anything. I deal in reality. The reality is he lied by omission.
Signatures are not posts retard. You can have sigs turned off and still see posts.

No wonder you can't understand what really was asked and answered.
 
Signatures are not posts retard. You can have sigs turned off and still see posts.

No wonder you can't understand what really was asked and answered.

lol

A signature is included in EVERY post, idiot. You do know what the word 'included' means, don't you? Or do you wish to take a poll to find out?
 
No, it means during the specified time period covered by the campaign, you spinning sack of shit. Sessions should have qualified his statement. He should have said...



“I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians in the service of the campaign, and I’m unable to comment on it.”

He left out the bold.
And you claim you didn't say what he should have said. Lmao, right there on your post.

You're either a liar or a retard, which is it?
 
Back
Top