TRUMP: If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech...NO FEDERAL FUNDS?

Mr.Badguy said:
So his political views are the deciding factor here, not his sexuality? Tell me, how does that constitute a hate crime? If one of the protesters/rioters used the same language as you, I might give credence to the notion.
Click to expand...

I explained it. When his views don't fit the agenda of the homos, he's not considered one to them in the light of things happening here. Same as with blacks that vote Republican. The Democrat house n*ggers consider them Uncle Toms that are "acting white".

Also along the same lines at the left wing females that would't allow the pro life females to march with them. https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...d-womens-march-protesters-showed-up/21662068/
 
CFM said:
I explained it. When his views don't fit the agenda of the homos, he's not considered one to them in the light of things happening here. Same as with blacks that vote Republican. The Democrat house n*ggers consider them Uncle Toms that are "acting white".

Also along the same lines at the left wing females that would't allow the pro life females to march with them. https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...d-womens-march-protesters-showed-up/21662068/
Click to expand...

You basically just ruined your own logic. So race and sexuality only matter to us when we let political ideology determine when it matters? Then maybe race and sexuality don't matter to us as much as you claim.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
You basically just ruined your own logic. So race and sexuality only matter to us when we let political ideology determine when it matters? Then maybe race and sexuality don't matter to us as much as you claim.
Click to expand...

I provided proof and examples of where my logic is how things works with you leftists pussies.

CNN contributor Mark Lamont Hill referred to blacks Steve Harvey, Kanye West, and Ray Lewis "mediocre negroes" because they dared meet with the President to, in their words, "to discuss policy matters". While none of them fit Hill's description, it's quite clear that he has chose to remain a Democrat house negro, or perhaps he hasn't made it up from field negro.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
So what you're saying is, if Milo Y. was gay, we'd all be up in arms crying about a hate crime?
Click to expand...

He's a self-professed gay man. You're pissing down your leg, but heck. I don't discriminate. It's your constitutional right to be a doofus. Might I suggest Depends? You could be a respectable Doofus after all...

Yes. You would scream "Hate Crime" if the parties were reversed.
 
CFM said:
That excuse, huh? Let a faggot or minority have something done to them anywhere close to what happened here and you lefties would already be screaming about the Justice Department investigating civil rights violations.
Click to expand...
Your words, not mine. You then gave examples of the opposite happening, and said it was because of their political affiliation.
 
If we can flip flop so easily between overprotecting minorites and homosexuals or vilifying them because of their political views, then maybe race and sexuality aren't as important to us as you'd like to claim.
 
Midas Whale67 said:
He's a self-professed gay man. You're pissing down your leg, but heck. I don't discriminate. It's your constitutional right to be a doofus. Might I suggest Depends? You could be a respectable Doofus after all...

Yes. You would scream "Hate Crime" if the parties were reversed.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't scream hate crime either way, but nice try. Maybe if his sexuality were the actual reason for the protest... AFAIK the only person that used the word "faggot" that day was Milo himself.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
If we can flip flop so easily between overprotecting minorites and homosexuals or vilifying them because of their political views, then maybe race and sexuality aren't as important to us as you'd like to claim.
Click to expand...

As long as Liberals support faggots and minorities having protected class status, it's shows you believe otherwise.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Because I'm that rare breed of liberal (according to you) that can accept things I don't necessarily agree with?
Click to expand...

That acceptance is the same as being in support of it. You say it's wrong but do nothing to stop it. The end result is the same as if you were protesting for it. It's like never buying a lottery ticket then wondering why you don't win.
 
How's this, if they had a vote tomorrow to get rid of special treatment, hate crimes etc, I'd vote to get rid of them. Until then, I"ll just vote for people that most closely share my values. That's my "protest" and it's arguably more effective.

Are you out protesting against all the things you don't agree with? Oh, you must be protesting for them then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top