Poor baby. Is there a way you can be sedated before you hurt yourself or someone around you?
Trump doesn't want your vote in 2024. Just your obedience while he trashes the U.S. a
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Poor baby. Is there a way you can be sedated before you hurt yourself or someone around you?
No one is fooled by your posturing.
You said there was all this election fraud in 2020 but you did nothing about it when given the chance...so I guess you either are lying about the 2020 election being stolen, or you're just the biggest fucking pussy on JPP.
Actually the Congress should have done something about it and violated their oath of office by not investigating the the fraud.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/the-supreme-court-petition-set-to-rock-america/
Ah, so what you're saying is that if you have a problem with something, it's someone else's responsibility to do something about it.
What a fucking loser.
Really?
I DESPISE both parties, Trump and Biden for POTUS.
But where is your link(s) to unbiased, factual, documented PROOF that the election was 'stolen'?
Which you are asserting - in a matter-of-fact manner - that it was?
I am guessing you can provide, no such link(s).
Last edited:
Trump doesn't want your vote in 2024. Just your obedience while he trashes the U.S. again
[FONT=&]
The Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection. This is what an election looks like to Donald Trump. (Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times)
Don’t misunderstand what Donald Trump means when he says he’s running for president again, as he did Tuesday evening.
He doesn’t mean that he will present his case to the American people in 2024 in the expectation that a majority of them will choose him, as they have never done before — not in 2016, when he lost the popular vote but won the electoral college, nor in 2020, when he lost both.
He doesn’t mean that he puts his faith in American democracy, election integrity, the laws of presidential succession or any other institution that is coterminous with the nation itself. He doesn’t mean he plans to abide by any of those things.
That would be what pretty much any other candidate would mean. But not Trump.
The ex-president has demonstrated unmistakably that he intends to take the office by hook or by crook, by denying the validity of any vote against him, by lying to his armed and angry rabble, by pressuring state election officials, state legislatures and federal courts to lie, cheat and otherwise betray the American people and their democracy.
He means that winning office, for him, need not mean being elected to it, but merely attaining it, even by coup if that’s what it takes.
That’s not hyperbole, or mere opinion. It’s not simply a hunch or a worry. It’s a fact, verified by his shocking and unprecedented actions and statements following his Nov. 3, 2020, defeat.
It’s inherent in his blatantly false claims that ballots two years ago were lost, stolen or fraudulently cast. It’s documented in his attempt to obstruct Congress in certifying his election loss by calling on his vice president to break the law, and by summoning his own supporters to Washington to march on the Capitol to thwart the ceremonial count.
It’s clear by his rapt attention to the televised deadly invasion of the Capitol after his speech whipping up the mob, and his failure, for more than three hours, to call on the insurrectionists to stand down.
It's evident by his role in adding Jan. 6, 2021, to the list of unforgettable dates — Dec. 7, 1941, and Sept. 11, 2001 — on which the nation's laws, democracy and freedom were imperiled.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/editorial-trump-doesnt-want-vote-022411346.html
[/FONT]
Bob Woodward calls Trump an 'unparalleled danger' No sh*t!
So what?
if you think that Biden or 95% of ALL other, federal politicians (on either side) gives a shit about America over themselves?
You are naive in the extemis.
Trump is just too blunt (and/or too stupid) to cover up that truth as well as the rest do.
Last edited:
It's real easy to hold this kind of position because it requires no effort...it's just an easy way to play a pathetically childish and cynical game.
"Politicians are out for themselves"! OK, then why do you keep voting for them?
Let's get one thing straight?
You have stated on numerous occasions that you 'hate children'.
ALL children!!!
Plus, you have openly wished for everyone on the right to die.
That means you are - in my view - emotionally disturbed at best.
A flat out, psychopath - at worst.
The day I give a shit what you think about almost anything (unless I am REALLY bored)?
Satan will be skating to work.
BTW - I haven't voted for a politician in years. And I doubt I ever will again.
Why the fuck would I vote for people whose skill set is beyond pathetic?
DUH!!!
Get help...you sick, piece of human excrement.
Before your injure/kill someone.
There is literally - no one on this board who I feel is more disturbed than you.
We are done here.
Have a WONDERFUL day.
Oh trust me, she will - almost certainly - pout some more.
You: Politicians are out for themselves.
Me: Then why do you keep voting for them?
You: YOU HATE CHILDREN!!
I may hate children, but I'm not the one who wants to pull down their pants in front of Ted Cruz and Rand Paul so they can stare at kids' genitals all day.
Don't you support that policy to "protect women's sports" or whatever fucking bullshit excuse you're using today?
Then what the flying fuck are you doing on Just Plain POLITICS?
What a fucking idiot, and probably a liar too.
I'm 99% sure you're lying about not voting in elections...if you didn't care about them, you wouldn't be trying so hard to convince everyone you don't.
I bet you voted pervert GOP and are just too fucking ashamed to admit it.
And BTW, you sick cunt?
Prove me wrong by showing us ALL a link to unbiased, factual proof that even 5% of federal politicians care more about the country than themselves?
I GUARANTEE that you cannot.
Which makes your point, pathetically erroneous.
You child hating, human filth.
Have a nice day.
Cunt.
Hands off, perv. Don't you have some child genitals to inspect?
I didn't disagree with you, I just wanted to know why you kept voting for them.
But then you said you didn't vote, so now I'm wondering what the fuck you're even doing on JPP?
Since you don't participate in the political process, why are you participating in political threads?
Probably because you're lonely and don't have any friends.
I may hate children but I'm not the one demanding that we pull down every kid's pants for the pleasure of Pervert Conservatives.
I haven't seen you denounce that policy at all...in fact, haven't you defended genital inspections because of phony transphobia?
If so, that would not only make you a child hater but also a child abuser.
Here is something to chew on.
“This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.
“In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.
“These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.”
The ensuing five (5) pages lists the names of the “Parties to the Proceedings,” all 388 of them in the U.S. Congress, the Senate, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Michael Pence.
The petition goes on to list cases, Article I, Section 3 of the Utah Constitution, jurisdiction, statutes, rules, proceedings, statements of the case, and Supreme Court Rule 14(F) Provisions.
Brunson Conclusion:
In the end of the 18-page petition, Brunson arrives at his conclusion [emphasis ours]:
“This petition is set forth in the interest of justice in protecting Brunson’s right to petition for a redress of grievances against the Respondents, and ensuring his right of due process against the encroachment of the doctrine of equitable maxim, and charging the Respondents who failed to investigate the allegations of a rigged election by having them removed from office without further delay.”
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/the-supreme-court-petition-set-to-rock-america/
Turns out 3/4 of the Congress are the traitors that violated their oath of office. It is an open and shut case and the MSM will not touch it. I wonder why?
Your link to 'unbiased, factual proof' is American Media Periscope?
That is your idea of 'unbiased'?
We are done here.
Good day.
Your link to 'unbiased, factual proof' is American Media Periscope?
That is your idea of 'unbiased'?
We are done here.
Good day.
It is on the SC docket. Go look for yourself. That is a real case.It does not matter who reports it. You dumbass.
Into the Night
Verified User
No such demand. Stop making shit up.