Into the Night
Verified User
He's soliciting a biased result
- "find" without a specific source means "generate"
- making threats not over a specific mistake, but over lack of outcome
He is not soliciting anything. He is pointing out the level of fraud.
 
	 
 
		 Would a criminal defense attorney use vagueness and equivocation and lexical ambiguity to try and get Trump off? (again). Fuck yes.  But the case is as strong.
    Would a criminal defense attorney use vagueness and equivocation and lexical ambiguity to try and get Trump off? (again). Fuck yes.  But the case is as strong.