The majority of the non-SSI, non-working Medicaid enrollees aren't disables, old, or veterans.
What is that total # anyway?
You made the claim, time to cite your source.
The majority of the non-SSI, non-working Medicaid enrollees aren't disables, old, or veterans.
You JUST SAID that Capitalism "doesn't provide":
So it doesn't provide the opportunity to provide for yourself. YOU JUST SAID THAT.
You've gaslit your own argument. What a doof.
Yup.
All private insurance does is tie a profit motive to the administration of payments to providers; a function that doesn't need a profit motive in the first place. Also, a single payer system makes the most sense as it would streamline the administrative workflow. Less than 1% of CMS' budget is administrative, whereas overhead accounts for anywhere between 10-20% of the budget for a single insurance company. Medicare is much more efficient than private insurance in what its function is; administration.
Go fuck yourself. No one's revolting in Canada.
People on medicaid rely on someone else to provide for them what they should be providing for themselves.
What is that total # anyway?
You made the claim, time to cite your source.
You need to source your claim about how many people are on Medicaid who aren't working already, disabled, old, or a veteran.
Can you cite that statistic?
You take something out of context and do so because you know without people like me, the ones that succeeded under capitalism, you'd have nothing. Since you rely on the hard work of others to provide for you, you still have nothing. You should kill yourself and stop being a burden on society.
You doubt what it says. By your standard of proof, unless you can prove what I said is incorrect, it stands as fact.
That's the shtick, yeah, not the reality for vast swaths of our utterly corrupt society.
You take something out of context and do so because you know without people like me, the ones that succeeded under capitalism, you'd have nothing. Since you rely on the hard work of others to provide for you, you still have nothing. You should kill yourself and stop being a burden on society.
Can you prove it wrong?
I doubt your claims that have been unsourced this entire thread.
You don't cite your sources. So that throws everything you write into question.
Then the reality is they aren't doing enough. Plenty provide for themselves. Means those not doing so need to try harder.
Then the reality is they aren't doing enough. Plenty provide for themselves. Means those not doing so need to try harder.
gotta get done.. this is why it's soo hard to do, but it simply cannot continue
Census data: Half of U.S. poor or low income
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/census-data-half-of-us-poor-or-low-income/
It's a failed system pard, nothing "exceptional" about it.
I doubt you can disprove them which means, by your standard, they are fact.
Cradle-to-grave indoctrination coupled with a political/economic system that only the affluent have a represented voice in. By design. Go back to the founding. The grand american vision form day one was rule by an entitled aristocracy; only land owning aristocratic white males got a vote/voice.
Now it's just money straight up. Corporations are people too my friend, and you people simply can't cover the cost of "speech".
How much does anyone want to bet this guy is on some kind of government welfare?