Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

[Teflon Don]

Trump is one of only two presidents in well over a century to be elected without winning the popular vote (the other is George W. Bush, who was about half a million votes behind Al Gore).

Does that sound like a popular revolution?

Your first sentence is irrelevant and a non sequitur. At no time in history has the popular vote had any bearing in electing a United States President. Why do you bring it up like it matters? In fact even your fellow liberals never thought the popular vote mattered in 2016. Want to know why? You won't find one thread asking people to "PREDICT THE POPULAR VOTE". Here are your fellow libs statements on the Electoral College

I'd like to know how? This has been one of the most boring Presidential campaigns ever. It's not even close to the hilarity of the primaries. Both candidates are quite unpopular but one far more so than the other that the one, Clinton, has a dominating lead in the electoral college.

I don't know why they do a popular poll, the only one that matters is the electoral poll and Hillary is still winning the electorate.

LOL Conventional wisdom my ass. The numbers show that Clinton has a substantial lead in the electoral college, and even without including toss up States she's already over 270 EV's. This isn't conventional wisdom. It's simple math.

The electoral map is the only poll that counts.

……I think Hillary gets over 300 electoral votes tomorrow, and that it's a relatively early call…

My prediction is that Clinton will win with 331 EV to Trumps 207 EV. What are your electoral college predictions?

Clinton 386
Trumpf 152

TRUMP 215
CLINTON 320
My prediction, I might change it, but if I don't and get it correct it will be pretty awesome.

As for your question, did I say it was a popular "revolution"? I don't believe in revolutions. That is a leftist term and construct

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Your first sentence is irrelevant and a non sequitur. At no time in history has the popular vote had any bearing in electing a United States President. Why do you bring it up like it matters?

Because it has a direct bearing on your claim, which I quoted: "This is a full fledged war ... This is about a very large segment of society being sick and tired of the "elites" promising and promising yet doing nothing."

BS. It's about a minority of the electorate being duped by a second-rate con man, with an even smaller minority of bigots and extremists scrambling on the bandwagon.

And I'm not a "liberal" in the dismissive sense that you mean.