Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
I didn't vote for Trump, in fact I have been vocal against him.
What position or positions do I hold that make me a right winger?
I doubt you can name two.
Didn't think Thing could list any. LOL
I didn't vote for Trump, in fact I have been vocal against him.
What position or positions do I hold that make me a right winger?
I doubt you can name two.
Didn't think Thing could list any. LOL
I actually have no idea what your political positions are. You rarely talk about substance on this board. But you chime in every time a lefty criticizes Trump or the GOP with "What about Hillary," or Obama, or Dems, or whatever. It's always the same thing.
So, it isn't credible that you aren't a rightie.
Remember when Hillary, in the debate said Trump was Putins puppet? Trumps response was essentially, I know you are but what am I? He interrupted her and said, no, you're the puppet. He said it twice.
That is some serious immaturity and one of my biggest concerns with him being president and pulling that crap in international relations.

LMAO, you have no idea what my political positions are, yet, you can claim I am a right wing hack.
At least you admit you lied.
The rest of your post are lies as well, I've made numerous posts about my concerns with Trump, defended Michelle against right wing attacks, etc... but yeah, you can dishonestly claim I am a right wing hack from those posts.
Loser.
I stated my case, and it's sound. You're ridiculously one-sided on this board, and incredibly predictable.
You're one of the biggest hacks here, quite honestly.
See post 44 for starters you pissant liar. You ain't got shit, you even admitted you don't know my positions, yet still claim I am a right winger hack.
GFY. There are plenty of posts of mine that show you're nothing but a bitter liar. At least when I call you out, I speak the truth.
And, you call so many people hacks, your opinion is worth spit.
Please, Trump lies pretty much everyday. It may be an exaggeration, but he knows he has no proof, but makes a claim anyway, just like he did with Boeing.
Stop being a blind apologist for him.
Because shareholders lost money. He is not just a business man anymore, he is the PE and soon to be president.
He needs to start acting like one.

As I see it, asking people to explain the differences they see in one politicians actions to another's can be helpful in determining the level of consistency in a poster's judgment or how informed they are of each politician's action(s)... To me, that can potentially be very substantive. If you get tired of seeing these questions, that could be evidence that there's too much hypocrisy in the criticism certain posters give only to one political side...Like I said, you hardly ever talk substance. Your positions do not matter. You defend righties everywhere, and constantly attack the libbies here. And your schtick is always the same...."what about what Hillary did...or Obama...or Dems...."
Right. Wing. Hack.
As I see it, asking people to explain the differences they see in one politicians actions to another's can be helpful in determining the level of consistency in a poster's judgment or how informed they are of each politician's action(s)... To me, that can potentially be very substantive. If you get tired of seeing these questions, that could be evidence that there's too much hypocrisy in the criticism certain posters give only to one political side...
You missed out.
We may never have a President who inspires us like this again.
Obama speaks to the best of us as Americans. Trump, unfortunately, speaks to the worst of us. There couldn't be a more stark difference.
Please. It's about volume. You have about 83 "defend rightie" posts for every milquetoast critique of Trump.
And Thingy, how many right wingers have said Trump is a liar?
Don't worry, I won't wait for you to answer the question, because I know you never will because when you do, it will show you're a liar.
LOL, so now it is about volume. Tell me, were those posts "right winger" posts?
Yes or no.
As I see it, asking people to explain the differences they see in one politicians actions to another's can be helpful in determining the level of consistency in a poster's judgment or how informed they are of each politician's action(s)... To me, that can potentially be very substantive. If you get tired of seeing these questions, that could be evidence that there's too much hypocrisy in the criticism certain posters give only to one political side...
Token posts. As I have said, you like to fancy yourself as having some sort of objectivity, so you throw in one of those tepid "critiques" once in awhile.
Yeah - the volume matters. Because the rest of it is constant.
You're a complete hack.

I'm sure I'll be attacked as a "hack" for saying this, but in my experience, the "left" is drenched in hypocrisy, and I think it's mainly because they tend to be more emotional or politically persuaded through emotional arguments, and thus, more short-sighted in the views they hold, or done in a moment of emotional weakness. Rob Lowe even said something similar in 2011 (at about the 0:44 second mark in the below video):But to continually only ask those on the left, and not those on the right?
Sorry - pretty much a giveaway there. Though I'm sure Yurt appreciates your effort.