To those who don't get Obama...

Didn't think Thing could list any. LOL

I actually have no idea what your political positions are. You rarely talk about substance on this board. But you chime in every time a lefty criticizes Trump or the GOP with "What about Hillary," or Obama, or Dems, or whatever. It's always the same thing.

So, it isn't credible that you aren't a rightie.
 
I actually have no idea what your political positions are. You rarely talk about substance on this board. But you chime in every time a lefty criticizes Trump or the GOP with "What about Hillary," or Obama, or Dems, or whatever. It's always the same thing.

So, it isn't credible that you aren't a rightie.

LMAO, you have no idea what my political positions are, yet, you can claim I am a right wing hack.

At least you admit you lied.

The rest of your post are lies as well, I've made numerous posts about my concerns with Trump, defended Michelle against right wing attacks, etc... but yeah, you can dishonestly claim I am a right wing hack from those posts.

Loser.
 
Check out this right wing post of mine:

Remember when Hillary, in the debate said Trump was Putins puppet? Trumps response was essentially, I know you are but what am I? He interrupted her and said, no, you're the puppet. He said it twice.

That is some serious immaturity and one of my biggest concerns with him being president and pulling that crap in international relations.

:rofl2:
 
LMAO, you have no idea what my political positions are, yet, you can claim I am a right wing hack.

At least you admit you lied.

The rest of your post are lies as well, I've made numerous posts about my concerns with Trump, defended Michelle against right wing attacks, etc... but yeah, you can dishonestly claim I am a right wing hack from those posts.

Loser.

I stated my case, and it's sound. You're ridiculously one-sided on this board, and incredibly predictable.

You're one of the biggest hacks here, quite honestly.
 
I stated my case, and it's sound. You're ridiculously one-sided on this board, and incredibly predictable.

You're one of the biggest hacks here, quite honestly.

See post 44 for starters you pissant liar. You ain't got shit, you even admitted you don't know my positions, yet still claim I am a right winger hack.

GFY. There are plenty of posts of mine that show you're nothing but a bitter liar. At least when I call you out, I speak the truth.

And, you call so many people hacks, your opinion is worth spit.
 
See post 44 for starters you pissant liar. You ain't got shit, you even admitted you don't know my positions, yet still claim I am a right winger hack.

GFY. There are plenty of posts of mine that show you're nothing but a bitter liar. At least when I call you out, I speak the truth.

And, you call so many people hacks, your opinion is worth spit.

Like I said, you hardly ever talk substance. Your positions do not matter. You defend righties everywhere, and constantly attack the libbies here. And your schtick is always the same...."what about what Hillary did...or Obama...or Dems...."

Right. Wing. Hack.
 
Here are more "right wing" posts by me that Thingy claims makes me a right winger hack.

Please, Trump lies pretty much everyday. It may be an exaggeration, but he knows he has no proof, but makes a claim anyway, just like he did with Boeing.

Stop being a blind apologist for him.

Because shareholders lost money. He is not just a business man anymore, he is the PE and soon to be president.

He needs to start acting like one.

Thingy will of course ignore these posts and try his best to pretend they don't exist and then come back and ramble about how I'm "one of the biggest hacks here".

:rofl2:

Poor Thingy, can't find the truth if it slapped him in the face.
 
Like I said, you hardly ever talk substance. Your positions do not matter. You defend righties everywhere, and constantly attack the libbies here. And your schtick is always the same...."what about what Hillary did...or Obama...or Dems...."

Right. Wing. Hack.
As I see it, asking people to explain the differences they see in one politicians actions to another's can be helpful in determining the level of consistency in a poster's judgment or how informed they are of each politician's action(s)... To me, that can potentially be very substantive. If you get tired of seeing these questions, that could be evidence that there's too much hypocrisy in the criticism certain posters give only to one political side...
 
As I see it, asking people to explain the differences they see in one politicians actions to another's can be helpful in determining the level of consistency in a poster's judgment or how informed they are of each politician's action(s)... To me, that can potentially be very substantive. If you get tired of seeing these questions, that could be evidence that there's too much hypocrisy in the criticism certain posters give only to one political side...

But to continually only ask those on the left, and not those on the right?

Sorry - pretty much a giveaway there. Though I'm sure Yurt appreciates your effort.
 
And Thingy, how many right wingers have said Trump is a liar?

Don't worry, I won't wait for you to answer the question, because I know you never will because when you do, it will show you're a liar.
 
And Thingy, how many right wingers have said Trump is a liar?

Don't worry, I won't wait for you to answer the question, because I know you never will because when you do, it will show you're a liar.

Quite a few. Guess you never heard of #NeverTrump.
 
LOL, so now it is about volume. Tell me, were those posts "right winger" posts?

Yes or no.

Token posts. As I have said, you like to fancy yourself as having some sort of objectivity, so you throw in one of those tepid "critiques" once in awhile.

Yeah - the volume matters. Because the rest of it is constant.

You're a complete hack.
 
As I see it, asking people to explain the differences they see in one politicians actions to another's can be helpful in determining the level of consistency in a poster's judgment or how informed they are of each politician's action(s)... To me, that can potentially be very substantive. If you get tired of seeing these questions, that could be evidence that there's too much hypocrisy in the criticism certain posters give only to one political side...

Thingy does this all the time. He complains about the "what about Obama" while he frequently uses the very same arguments against those he does not politically agree with.

I don't know what happened to him, but after Trump won, he slowly became unglued and has only become more unhinged by the day. Like another poster told him, I used to respect him, but he has lost it since the election.
 
Token posts. As I have said, you like to fancy yourself as having some sort of objectivity, so you throw in one of those tepid "critiques" once in awhile.

Yeah - the volume matters. Because the rest of it is constant.

You're a complete hack.

So you can't answer with a simple yes or no. And as a typical liberal, you throw around the word "token". Token black person, token posts.

The truth is, I have not supported Trump, but you call me a right wing hack. I don't support many right wing platforms, but you feel comfortable lying that I do, even while admitting you don't know my political positions. See, when I call you out, I back it up.

Pro gay marriage
Pro marijuana legalization
Pro rebuilding our infrastructure
Con Tillerson for his position
Con Trump as President
Pro loan forgiveness for students who can work in public service

GFY liar. I don't know what happened to you after the election, but you're totally unhinged. We actually got along when I first joined.
 
But to continually only ask those on the left, and not those on the right?

Sorry - pretty much a giveaway there. Though I'm sure Yurt appreciates your effort.
I'm sure I'll be attacked as a "hack" for saying this, but in my experience, the "left" is drenched in hypocrisy, and I think it's mainly because they tend to be more emotional or politically persuaded through emotional arguments, and thus, more short-sighted in the views they hold, or done in a moment of emotional weakness. Rob Lowe even said something similar in 2011 (at about the 0:44 second mark in the below video):


And whenever I see hypocrisy alleged towards the right, it tends to either be a false case where actual differences can be explained and noted, or it is specific to a certain poster's statements who may have gone too far with provocative statements.
 
Back
Top