“Three weeks and 39 mass shootings. This is America in 2023”

So long as you limit (this is called "windowing" in data science, it's a special form of cherry picking) data so it proves your point of course that makes sense.
Data is not a science. Windowing data is not cherry picking. YOU are cherry picking and conflation. That's the cherry picking fallacy. Inversion fallacy.
But if you consider all loss of life due to guns a problem then your point fails.
Conflation fallacy. Special pleading fallacy.
But I understand, you don't like people and your war on God makes you kind of cold and uncaring and I'm sure suicides are beneath your care.
Conflation fallacy. Bigotry.
You are wrong. There. Now when you repeat this it will be a LIE.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
 
JUefkRg.jpg

Still demonstrating that the left can't meme, I see.
 
“ Three weeks and 39 mass shootings. This is America in 2023”

“There are about 393 million privately owned firearms in the US. That’s 120 guns for every 100 Americans. 45% of US adults say they live in a household with a gun, according to an October 2022 Gallup survey.“

“Firearm injuries are now the leading cause of death among people younger than 24 in the United States. From 2015 through 2020, there were at least 2,070 unintentional shootings by children under 18 in the US. Those shootings resulted in 765 deaths and 1,366 injuries.”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/23/politics/mass-shootings-in-2023-what-matters/index.html

“Tragedy upon tragedy’: why 39 US mass shootings already this year is just the start”

“There are more guns in the US than people, according to a 2018 Small Arms Survey report, which found the country had the highest rate of firearm ownership in the world, and more than double the next country on the list, Yemen.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...shootings-already-this-year-is-just-the-start

“2023 Off To Historically Fast Start For Mass Shootings”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nichol...o-historically-fast-start-for-mass-shootings/

”More mass shootings than days of the year: The grim reality of gun violence in the US“.
https://www.firstpost.com/explainer...ifornia-death-toll-gun-violence-12034902.html

And the right keep telling us the solution is even guns are necessary

Yawn. If it all results in less "democrats"...who cares?
 
“ Three weeks and 39 mass shootings. This is America in 2023”

“There are about 393 million privately owned firearms in the US. That’s 120 guns for every 100 Americans. 45% of US adults say they live in a household with a gun, according to an October 2022 Gallup survey.“

“Firearm injuries are now the leading cause of death among people younger than 24 in the United States. From 2015 through 2020, there were at least 2,070 unintentional shootings by children under 18 in the US. Those shootings resulted in 765 deaths and 1,366 injuries.”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/23/politics/mass-shootings-in-2023-what-matters/index.html

“Tragedy upon tragedy’: why 39 US mass shootings already this year is just the start”

“There are more guns in the US than people, according to a 2018 Small Arms Survey report, which found the country had the highest rate of firearm ownership in the world, and more than double the next country on the list, Yemen.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...shootings-already-this-year-is-just-the-start

“2023 Off To Historically Fast Start For Mass Shootings”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nichol...o-historically-fast-start-for-mass-shootings/

”More mass shootings than days of the year: The grim reality of gun violence in the US“.
https://www.firstpost.com/explainer...ifornia-death-toll-gun-violence-12034902.html

And the right keep telling us the solution is even guns are necessary

Interesting how the media want to pad their 'mass shootings' numbers with incidents of gang violence, yet still want to hold onto their myth of the average mass shooter being a white male. Have their cake and eat it too, I guess.
 
Ummm...because if police can't be trusted with weapons, then no one can.
so government agents are much better people than you?

Not many 65 year old grandmothers are being shot by criminals.

Not many 65 year old grandmothers are shooting themselves.

I guess what I'm trying to say is...I don't want old people waving guns around.

you don't want anyone waving guns around. Neither does any sane person, but there are sociopathic criminals out there that don't give a fuck about what you want and if a 65 year old grandmother stands in their way, they can get shot.
 
What good is a gun on the hands of that mother if she doesn't see the criminal sneaking up behind her?

Like, this is such an easy thing to dismiss because humans don't have eyes in the back of their head.

there's this thing called 'situational awareness'. I'm surprised you haven't heard of it. Or do you believe that only government agents are trained in that?
 
Not many criminals are going to give you a heads up that they're gonna try to attack you.

There is one solid truth about everything you're saying. Only the bad guy knows if there's going to be shooting. However, that does not mean one can be prepared for it........Is that criminal going to take the chance if there are 3 or more armed individuals in sight? No, they are going to look for softer targets
 
Back
Top