This is Who We Pay to Protect Us?

cawacko said:
You wouldn't think you were targeted by workers who were calling you names from the back? How many workers in back have called you names in your restaurant going experiences?
Click to expand...

I would not eat @ any place where the employees/cooks in the back are talkin shit to me........ To much spice may have been the least of their problems from some of the stories I have heard over the years..
 
These deputies need to man-up. I'm personally a spice lightweight, but I wouldn't let these twerps get to me. Of course, I would be able to tell immediately that my food was too spicy...
 
Seahawk said:
Zappa's answer.

Zappa would rather play petty semantic word games than admit he lied.
Click to expand...

Strange, I still don't see where I used the term "rush hour" like you claimed.

A pity you can't just admit you lied and put words in my mouth I didn't say.
 
Taft2016 said:
But who says they were there at the "lunch rush," Other than you?
Click to expand...

The officers.

They stated they stopped by during their lunch break.

Now if you want to claim they were in the restaurant at some time other than the usual lunchtime hours, say 11-2, by all means find the proof and go for it.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
The officers.

They stated they stopped by during their lunch break.

Now if you want to claim they were in the restaurant at some time other than the usual lunchtime hours, say 11-2, by all means find the proof and go for it.
Click to expand...

No, it is up to YOU to prove it was lunch rush. You made the claim, but of now want others to prove your claim right or wrong. Not everyone takes lunch during 12-1. That is a fact. Also a fact is that this occurred SUNDAY, not known for a lunch rush.

Prove your claim or STFU liar.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
That's more of a mea culpa than I will get from the YurtHawk, I grant you that.
Click to expand...

Of all the topics to discuss on a political board I'm still struggling to understand how you came up with one about two cops who go to lunch, get yelled at by the workers while getting their food f'd with and your conclusion seems to be the cops are at fault here.

If the goal is to be anti-cop aren't there a lot better stories out there than this?
 
cawacko said:
Of all the topics to discuss on a political board I'm still struggling to understand how you came up with one about two cops who go to lunch, get yelled at by the workers while getting their food f'd with and your conclusion seems to be the cops are at fault here.

If the goal is to be anti-cop aren't there a lot better stories out there than this?
Click to expand...

There are all too many, but any port in a storm.
Did you see SuperTroopers? If not watch it. Funniest movie in a decade.
 
cawacko said:
Of all the topics to discuss on a political board I'm still struggling to understand how you came up with one about two cops who go to lunch, get yelled at by the workers while getting their food f'd with and your conclusion seems to be the cops are at fault here.

If the goal is to be anti-cop aren't there a lot better stories out there than this?
Click to expand...

It's because he, like so many other JPP liberals, decided to not only jump on the ALL COPS ARE BAD bandwagon; but they also choose to drive it.
 
Seahawk said:
No, it is up to YOU to prove it was lunch rush. You made the claim, but of now want others to prove your claim right or wrong. Not everyone takes lunch during 12-1. That is a fact. Also a fact is that this occurred SUNDAY, not known for a lunch rush.

Prove your claim or STFU liar.
Click to expand...

Wrong, as usual.

Common sense states the generally recognized time for "lunch" is around "midday".

If Taft wants to claim the officers ate their "lunch" at a time other than the generally recognized time, it's up to him to corroborate his claim.

Also, I never claimed "everyone" takes their lunch between 12-1...that is another LIE spread by you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top