Teflon Don
I'm back baby
John Boner used to, as well. He just wasn't expecting the whole Teabaggermania trip.
I am going to need you to cry harder
This is one seriously depressing election
- Thread starter Cancel 2020.1
- Start date
- Status
I am going to need you to cry harder
cancel2 2022
Canceled
It is around 185,000 per year. Don't get me wrong I hate abortion and wish there was no need for it but I am not about to tell a woman what to do about her body. I would also imagine a lot of those are women from Ireland, both North and South, where abortion is severely restricted.
Of course, you do realise that if the same thing happened in the US then women would just go to Canada, Europe, or maybe even Cuba. If you want to curtail abortion then make contraception free for the poor at least.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Why? Are condoms more expensive then french fries?
I think the Republicans had more better alternatives. Dick Cheney is about the only other Republican that would have had this much trouble with Hillary.
IDK, they are cheaper, more effective and less invasive than trying to regulate the later stages of reproduction. But then the "less invasive" part spoils the fun for most pro lifers.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
A logical fallacy- assigning motive without cause.
It's an aside and not actually a part of my argument, which you did not address.
It's obvious that the easiest way to reduce abortion is through better contraception. You don't need judges or to support some horrible person like Trump to do it either.
Outlawing abortion will cost a lot more than french fries and won't eliminate abortions.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You also have to ensure that all children get sex education at school and teenage girls have access to the morning after pill. Adults should have free vasectomies, sterilisation and birth control education available. If you don't do those things then how can complain about the high levels of abortion?
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Well, in our system their only hope is to overturn Roe v Wade, which would then only return the matter to the states. Women would not need to leave the country just go to California or some other state.
.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
All free of course. Yet condoms are $11 for two dozen at Walmart.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Your "argument" included demonization of your opposition. Until you address this issue with yourself there is no point for me to go further than that.
плач сильнее
Okay, I will address it. Many pro lifers are not concerned about reducing abortions. They only want to control/influence the sexual behavior of women. That's why they discourage or, as you do, blow off contraception. Contraception liberates the woman and does not serve their goal. If the woman faces the threat of pregnancy they believe that will discourage promiscuity.
Some even still want to deny their kids the HPV vaccine because they hope it will make their children less inclined to engage in sexual activity. The threat of cervical cancer is used the same way as the threat of pregnancy. I presume they will let women treat the cervical cancer.
https://rewire.news/article/2012/10...nsive-argument-that-gets-repeated-and-debunk/
Last edited:
evince
Truthmatters
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
I'm not going to research or argue against your point at all because I don't have to. On any given issue, there are always fringe groups on both sides with views that don't represent the majority of the groups. So for you to claim that this fringe represents my opinion, or the majority of the pro-life movement, is a non-starter.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
The consequence is, that some would rather spend their EBT on fast food then a pack of condoms.
And yet "pro lifers" have wasted 40 years and likely trillions of dollars on overturning Roe v Wade and harassing doctors/women. Is that, fiscally conservative or is it the real point?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Back to demonizing your opposition I see.
- Status