This is made possible by cowardly Americans

IConspiracy Theorists

Studying them and their cray-cray views of the world is interesting.

The study suggests conspiracy theorists are not necessarily ‘mentally unwell’, but often resort to conspiracy theories to fulfill unmet needs and rationalize distress. Analyzing data from 170 studies with over 158,000 participants, it identifies a need to understand and feel secure in their environment, and a sense of superiority over others as key drivers.

In addition, personality traits such as paranoia, insecurity, impulsivity, and egocentrism were found to be common among conspiracy theorists.
You'd say that to an actual eye witness to the 9/11 conspiracy by condoleezza rice, in ~august 1998 no less
 
You'd say that to an actual eye witness to the 9/11 conspiracy by condoleezza rice, in ~august 1998 no less
Yes. All conspiracy theorists are missing something in their brain-housing. They'd never be able to obtain a security clearance.
 
IConspiracy Theorists

Studying them and their cray-cray views of the world is interesting.

The study suggests conspiracy theorists are not necessarily ‘mentally unwell’, but often resort to conspiracy theories to fulfill unmet needs and rationalize distress. Analyzing data from 170 studies with over 158,000 participants, it identifies a need to understand and feel secure in their environment, and a sense of superiority over others as key drivers.

In addition, personality traits such as paranoia, insecurity, impulsivity, and egocentrism were found to be common among conspiracy theorists.
Dutch is a perfect example of an American coward. He claims to have joined the marines right around the time Reagan sent them to their death in Beirut. Dutch has no idea why they were there, or why Reagan had to admit it was a mistake sending them to fight another jew war on women and children.
 
Dutch is a perfect example of an American coward. He claims to have joined the marines right around the time Reagan sent them to their death in Beirut. Dutch has no idea why they were there, or why Reagan had to admit it was a mistake sending them to fight another jew war on women and children.
This story was just recently on my grapevine....apparently Reagan was talked into the deployment by one particular person (forget who)...the day they died he promised to never listen to this person again.....he could see that the deployment was idiotic.
 
This story was just recently on my grapevine....apparently Reagan was talked into the deployment by one particular person (forget who)...the day they died he promised to never listen to this person again.....he could see that the deployment was idiotic.
Caspar Weinburger and his horrible Wienburger doctrine.

  1. The United States should not commit forces to combat unless the vital national interests of the United States or its allies are involved.
  2. U.S. troops should only be committed wholeheartedly and with the clear intention of winning. Otherwise, troops should not be committed.
  3. U.S. combat troops should be committed only with clearly defined political and military objectives and with the capacity to accomplish those objectives.
  4. The relationship between the objectives and the size and composition of the forces committed should be continually reassessed and adjusted if necessary.
  5. U.S. troops should not be committed to battle without a "reasonable assurance" of the support of U.S. public opinion and Congress.
  6. The commitment of U.S. troops should be considered only as a last resort.
This is the crap you get when you let a liar... err, lawyer play general.
 
Yes. All conspiracy theorists are missing something in their brain-housing. They'd never be able to obtain a security clearance.
Or maybe they had too much dignity and integrity to get paid off (:

Too likely to find their own moral compass. A hack like you could never relate to someone like that. They'd be endlessly curious to you.
 

Attachments

  • GbTO-eRWgAAz5Fh.jpeg
    GbTO-eRWgAAz5Fh.jpeg
    64.4 KB · Views: 0
Caspar Weinburger and his horrible Wienburger doctrine.

  1. The United States should not commit forces to combat unless the vital national interests of the United States or its allies are involved.
  2. U.S. troops should only be committed wholeheartedly and with the clear intention of winning. Otherwise, troops should not be committed.
  3. U.S. combat troops should be committed only with clearly defined political and military objectives and with the capacity to accomplish those objectives.
  4. The relationship between the objectives and the size and composition of the forces committed should be continually reassessed and adjusted if necessary.
  5. U.S. troops should not be committed to battle without a "reasonable assurance" of the support of U.S. public opinion and Congress.
  6. The commitment of U.S. troops should be considered only as a last resort.
This is the crap you get when you let a liar... err, lawyer play general.
seem reasonable.

not everybody can be a cool retarded neocon idiot.
 
We could not even beat the sheep herders of Afghanistan....

I Mean Come On Man!

Stupid Hurts Here.
We don't typically "win" heroin wars. Heroin becomes the whole war plan and they always end with a hole in your soul.
 

Attachments

  • GbTO-eQXUAAElhT.jpeg
    GbTO-eQXUAAElhT.jpeg
    38.5 KB · Views: 0
  • MV5BMjQ3OTgzMzY4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTc4OTQyMzI@._V1_.jpg
    MV5BMjQ3OTgzMzY4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTc4OTQyMzI@._V1_.jpg
    472.4 KB · Views: 0
  • c5885edf570034e765e42fd8eaf4effea7bd7b3e71909f264772ac4e21d91c99_1 (1).jpg
    c5885edf570034e765e42fd8eaf4effea7bd7b3e71909f264772ac4e21d91c99_1 (1).jpg
    132.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot-20240829-011912 (1).jpg
    Screenshot-20240829-011912 (1).jpg
    87.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot-20240831-113827 (1) (1).jpg
    Screenshot-20240831-113827 (1) (1).jpg
    73.8 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot-20240826-192558 (1).jpg
    Screenshot-20240826-192558 (1).jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 0
  • FrankLucas (1) (1).jpg
    FrankLucas (1) (1).jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 15992245-large (1).jpg
    15992245-large (1).jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 1582440513_5cd490c7ba_w.jpg
    1582440513_5cd490c7ba_w.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 1563318318662_015816.jpg
    1563318318662_015816.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 0
fifth.jpg



Earl is a coward and a liar.
 
There's no reason for name calling. The oct7th attacks were despicable and desperate. How did they come to be so desperate? Hind sight is 20/20 but the answer can be found by looking at the present. There's no requirement for acts of war to be proportionate. That would fundamentally outlaw war. But if you're proud of yourselves for the way You're fighting back, israel, i can't see any reason to censor nazis either, in any way short of calls for violence, in all fairness.
 
Back
Top