They are talking Impeachment!

Taichiliberal said:
Aww, what's the matter bunky? All flustered because the chronology of the posts shows you up for the lying PO-Dixie-S that you are?

In case you or the other dummies don't get it, "chronology" means the order in which each post appears time wise. And when one sees who said what and when, it can either make or break the latest assertion of a poster.

Which is why you and every other neocon parrot and self proclaime pseudo-intellectual get all bent out of shape when I use the phrase...because it is a constant reminder that you can't lie or BS your way out of an honest debate.
Click to expand...


Did you get that, "Folks"??
 
Taichiliberal said:
Aww, what's the matter bunky? All flustered because the chronology of the posts shows you up for the lying PO-Dixie-S that you are?

In case you or the other dummies don't get it, "chronology" means the order in which each post appears time wise. And when one sees who said what and when, it can either make or break the latest assertion of a poster.

Which is why you and every other neocon parrot and self proclaime pseudo-intellectual get all bent out of shape when I use the phrase...because it is a constant reminder that you can't lie or BS your way out of an honest debate.
Click to expand...

Nobody gets bent out of shape by you overusing the word "chronology." We just think it illustrates what a blithering idiot you are. Generally speaking, most non-retarded people read the posts in order, in chronological order! Very few morons would ever read a thread in RANDOM order! So it makes about as much sense for you to say: "If you read the words in the posts left to right..."

Now I can see why it's such a big deal for you to point this out about chronology, in your retarded world, people probably suffer from the problem of reading things in random order, and maybe that's what is wrong with you? But constantly using the word "chronology" doesn't make your point any more valid, and it was broken from the time you presented it.
 
I actually get bent into shape by it. In fact, its grown on me so much, that now when I am making love to a woman, and its been several delightful minutes but no loud noises have ensued, I declare outloud "the chronology of strokes will show that neither of us has come yet, baby!"
 
Threedee said:
I actually get bent into shape by it. In fact, its grown on me so much, that now when I am making love to a woman, and its been several delightful minutes but no loud noises have ensued, I declare outloud "the chronology of strokes will show that neither of us has come yet, baby!"
Click to expand...

:eek:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Aww, what's the matter bunky? All flustered because the chronology of the posts shows you up for the lying PO-Dixie-S that you are?

In case you or the other dummies don't get it, "chronology" means the order in which each post appears time wise. And when one sees who said what and when, it can either make or break the latest assertion of a poster.

Which is why you and every other neocon parrot and self proclaime pseudo-intellectual get all bent out of shape when I use the phrase...because it is a constant reminder that you can't lie or BS your way out of an honest debate.
Click to expand...


Dixie said:
Nobody gets bent out of shape by you overusing the word "chronology." We just think it illustrates what a blithering idiot you are. Generally speaking, most non-retarded people read the posts in order, in chronological order! Very few morons would ever read a thread in RANDOM order! So it makes about as much sense for you to say: "If you read the words in the posts left to right..."

:palm: Dixie, you get dumber with each post......you consistently suggest and imply things that no one else is referring to. The chronology of the post is a phrase I use when dopes like you LIE about what has been previously stated. THAT'S why it pisses you clowns off, because you're out of context quotes, distortions and general bullshit cannot get around the chronology of the posts. TFB for you Dixie, go cry on Bravo's shoulder about it.

Now I can see why it's such a big deal for you to point this out about chronology, in your retarded world, people probably suffer from the problem of reading things in random order, and maybe that's what is wrong with you? But constantly using the word "chronology" doesn't make your point any more valid, and it was broken from the time you presented it.
Click to expand...

And as the chronology of the posts shows, your dopey Dixie ass just avoided this little fact that proved you wrong

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=688951&postcount=198

You don't even have the guts to acknowledge when facts prove you wrong, Dixie....you're pathetic, and I'm not just whistl'in Dixie on that!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ahh, but did you actually read any of them? And if you did, did you comprehend what you read? And did you process the information in accordance to the order to which it was presented and to what was responded to?:cof1:
Click to expand...

No. Actually I did not.

I don't think I will either.:cig:
 
The chronology of the post is a phrase I use when dopes like you LIE about what has been previously stated. THAT'S why it pisses you clowns off, because you're out of context quotes, distortions and general bullshit cannot get around the chronology of the posts.
Click to expand...

Oh, no one is pissed off by you doing this, I assure you! We are all laughing at what an idiot you are. It has become one of the more predictable things around here, you get trounced in debate, then you start spewing your nonsense about 'chronology'. What's even more amazing is how you do this thinking it somehow helps your position or better establishes your failed case. It can be safely assumed, regardless of the post topic or argument, the minute you typed 'chronology', the debate officially ended with your defeat.
 
Dixie said:
Oh, no one is pissed off by you doing this, I assure you! We are all laughing at what an idiot you are. It has become one of the more predictable things around here, you get trounced in debate, then you start spewing your nonsense about 'chronology'. What's even more amazing is how you do this thinking it somehow helps your position or better establishes your failed case. It can be safely assumed, regardless of the post topic or argument, the minute you typed 'chronology', the debate officially ended with your defeat.
Click to expand...

Wait until he throws out his leverage of "factual and honestly"; because then he'll tell you that you're done and to say "Good night Gracie". :cof1:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahh, but did you actually read any of them? And if you did, did you comprehend what you read? And did you process the information in accordance to the order to which it was presented and to what was responded to?
Click to expand...

Liberty said:
No. Actually I did not.

I don't think I will either.:cig:
Click to expand...

No skin off my nose....the statement was responding to ThreeDee....but thanks for offering this bit of information.
 
The chronology of the post is a phrase I use when dopes like you LIE about what has been previously stated. THAT'S why it pisses you clowns off, because you're out of context quotes, distortions and general bullshit cannot get around the chronology of the posts.
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
Oh, no one is pissed off by you doing this, I assure you! We are all laughing at what an idiot you are. It has become one of the more predictable things around here, you get trounced in debate, then you start spewing your nonsense about 'chronology'. What's even more amazing is how you do this thinking it somehow helps your position or better establishes your failed case. It can be safely assumed, regardless of the post topic or argument, the minute you typed 'chronology', the debate officially ended with your defeat.
Click to expand...

Notice folks, how this dim witted Dixie just ignores the definitions and points I put forth for a mere regurgitation of his BS opinion. Pity poor Dixie....all his bluff and bluster just can't erase how I deconstructed and disprove his BS in previous posts. As always, when intellectually bankrupt jokers like Dixie cannot defend their position with facts and logic, they switch to a personal attacks....and as the chronology of the posts shows, that route failed Dixie miserably.

Tancreado's little diatribe was taken apart and shown for the collection of neocon sour grapes and distorted mantras that it is....and jokers like Dixie just don't like it.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=689979&postcount=206
 
Taichiliberal said:
Notice folks, how this dim witted Dixie just ignores the definitions and points I put forth for a mere regurgitation of his BS opinion. Pity poor Dixie....all his bluff and bluster just can't erase how I deconstructed and disprove his BS in previous posts. As always, when intellectually bankrupt jokers like Dixie cannot defend their position with facts and logic, they switch to a personal attacks....and as the chronology of the posts shows, that route failed Dixie miserably.

Tancreado's little diatribe was taken apart and shown for the collection of neocon sour grapes and distorted mantras that it is....and jokers like Dixie just don't like it.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=689979&postcount=206
Click to expand...

There you have it folks.
It's all about the chronological order.
 
Threedee said:
Come on people, it was a highly offensive post. React!!!
Click to expand...

LOL... I was thinking earlier, when one of the pinheads posted pictures of Tea Partiers (supposedly) standing around with "derogatory" signs they claimed were racially insensitive, of Obama depicted as a monkey.... Wasn't it the LEFT who routinely had posters of Bush depicted as a Chimp? Why is it "racist" to depict Obama that way, and not Bush? Is it because chimps and monkeys are mostly black and brown? I've seen white monkeys before! (OMG... that sounded like something the late Robert Byrd would have said!)

Let's just forget I brought this up? :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top