They are talking Impeachment!

Dixie said:
Dixie: The only person who has been childishly melting down here is you, Chicklet. I am just trying to answer what appears to be important questions to you.



Post #158 --Chicklet: "Interesting...so what's the other 7/8 chuckles? And you're telling me that you're non-white? You can "pass" for Hispanic?"

Really Chicklet? You didn't ever ask me what the other 7/8ths were? Well, it appears someone is sneaking into your computer room and posting under your name here, because in Post #158, you certainly DID ask me about my ethnic/racial makeup, and it wasn't the first time. You repeatedly want to question this, and infer that I am lying about what I am!

Look, I really wish that I was "racially pure" like you! Maybe then I could begin to understand your air of superiority and condescention toward people who aren't like you. It would help me to understand why it's so important to point out someone's ethnicity and race in a debate about something pertaining to race, and run them in the ground because they aren't one particular thing or the other. Perhaps I could better understand why stereotypes are so important and altruistic. But I guess, being that I am a MUTT, I will never know what that is like. I'll just have to read your postings to try and better understand racial supremacy and bigotry.
Click to expand...
Say "chronology of the posts"... It's just rich with his ignorance. :D
 
Damocles said:
Say "chronology of the posts"... It's just rich with his ignorance. :D
Click to expand...

Yes, the "chronology" of the posts show him getting his ass handed to him over and over again, then he returns with more nonsense and ignorance to have it handed to him repeatedly again.

I think he must be an alcoholic. The reason I say that, most drunks behave this way... they simply keep repeating something that sounds 'smart' to them, over and over, until it becomes annoying as hell to everyone around, this usually leads to drunken belligerence. I don't want to prejudge him, but that does appear to be the case, based on his rants. He gets good and tanked up, then comes here to be a shitfaced prick, which is markedly better than being a shitfaced prick out in public where you can get your ass kicked for real.
 
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: See what I'm saying folks? Southy is such a intellectually dishonest child that he's starting to believe his own BS.

Someone explain to Southy that in order for me to "plagiarize" him, Southy would have had to put forth said information first. Well, I made a simple challenge...all he has to do is point out what post PRIOR to post #74 did he do that contains said information, and he's proven his point.

To date, Southy can't do it. But like the immature clown that he is, Southy will just continue to bray the false prentense like the jackass he is.....so much more to pity the Southern Man for. I leave him to his fate.
Click to expand...

Once again, Libby, the "chronology of the posts is your undoing". Here's the post that I am referring to:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=680923&postcount=92

and two posts later you plagiarized it:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=681494&postcount=94

Read on in that same thread. I repeatedly ax'd you to admit your plagiarism, even giving you the benefit of doubt that you made a simple mistake, but you were not, and are not, man enough to admit that.

The Southern Man now predicts that Libby will go on another emotional rant and tell me to stick to a predefined issue in this and only this thread. :)
 
Dixie said:
Dixie: The only person who has been childishly melting down here is you, Chicklet. I am just trying to answer what appears to be important questions to you.

Post #158 --Chicklet: "Interesting...so what's the other 7/8 chuckles? And you're telling me that you're non-white? You can "pass" for Hispanic?"

Really Chicklet? You didn't ever ask me what the other 7/8ths were? Well, it appears someone is sneaking into your computer room and posting under your name here, because in Post #158, you certainly DID ask me about my ethnic/racial makeup, and it wasn't the first time. You repeatedly want to question this, and infer that I am lying about what I am!

Look, I really wish that I was "racially pure" like you! Maybe then I could begin to understand your air of superiority and condescention toward people who aren't like you. It would help me to understand why it's so important to point out someone's ethnicity and race in a debate about something pertaining to race, and run them in the ground because they aren't one particular thing or the other. Perhaps I could better understand why stereotypes are so important and altruistic. But I guess, being that I am a MUTT, I will never know what that is like. I'll just have to read your postings to try and better understand racial supremacy and bigotry.
Click to expand...


Actually, it was Post #136 were I pointed out that since YOU were not of brown skin, the new Arizona law proposals regarding immigration wouldn't affect you. You then proceeded to explain how you're actually of brown skin and gave us all the litany of percentages (new information from previous revelations from you, where you had just acknowledged lineage but NOT skin color or physical stature). My questions derived from the information you provide, which seems to be a new addition to suit each new discussion.

And as I explained earlier, your foolish ploy as to try to portray me as a racist only merits in your Dixie delusional mind. The chronology of the post clearly shows you rambling on about your racial make-up...of which I merely point out it makes your previous white supremacist leaning revisions of American history regarding civil rights, the Confederacy, slavery, etc., a bit psychotic. There is nothing LOGICAL about a person of your alleged physical make-up supporting a law that allows beat cops to just decide they don't consider your driver's ID "sufficient" during a roust that they determine "probable cause" for, and therefore can take you down town to sit in detention until you can produce a birth certificate or passport, etc.

In short, Dixie, you're just full of it...and like all little "intellectual" David Duke wanna-be's, you just make a fool of yourself with each vain attempt to defend your vile Dixie blatherings. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: Someone explain to this fucking Dixie moron that the chronology of the post shows that it was HE who put initiated/offered a discussion about his personal racial make-up. My comments, that he excerpts out of context of the discussion, come AFTERWARDS. If Dixie can provide the post on this thread were I initiated discussion about his personal ethnic/racial make-up, then he's welcome to do so. If he can't, then he's a LIAR.

And as I explained earlier, his foolish ploy as to try to portray me as a racist only merits in Dixie's delusional mind. The chronology of the post clearly shows this Dixie dunce rambling on about his racial make-up...of which I merely point out it makes his previous white supremacist leaning revisions of American history regarding civil rights, the Confederacy, slavery, etc., a bit psychotic.

In short, Dixie is just full of it...and like all little "intellectual" David Duke wanna-be's, Dixie just makes the fool of himself with each vain attempt to defend his vile blatherings. Let's watch him go!
Click to expand...


Did you get that folks??

H-E-L-L-O!!

Where are you folks??
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
See what I'm saying folks? Southy is such a intellectually dishonest child that he's starting to believe his own BS.

Someone explain to Southy that in order for me to "plagiarize" him, Southy would have had to put forth said information first. Well, I made a simple challenge...all he has to do is point out what post PRIOR to post #74 did he do that contains said information, and he's proven his point.

To date, Southy can't do it. But like the immature clown that he is, Southy will just continue to bray the false prentense like the jackass he is.....so much more to pity the Southern Man for. I leave him to his fate.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Once again, Libby, the "chronology of the posts is your undoing". Here's the post that I am referring to:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=680923&postcount=92

and two posts later you plagiarized it:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=681494&postcount=94

Read on in that same thread. I repeatedly ax'd you to admit your plagiarism, even giving you the benefit of doubt that you made a simple mistake, but you were not, and are not, man enough to admit that.

The Southern Man now predicts that Libby will go on another emotional rant and tell me to stick to a predefined issue in this and only this thread. :)
Click to expand...

And once again, folks...the chronology of the posts exposes Southy for the childishly stubborn liar that he is

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=682076&postcount=102

I leave him to repeat his Southern Man delusion in vain against the reality of facts and logic.
 
Damocles said:
Say "chronology of the posts"... It's just rich with his ignorance. :D
Click to expand...

:palm: Chronology of the posts exposes BS artists and liars like you and your new found buddies, Damo. Quite a crowd of intellectual neocon dynamos and David Duke wanna-be's you now curry favor with in grinding your axe against me.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Actually, it was Post #136 were I pointed out that since YOU were not of brown skin, the new Arizona law proposals regarding immigration wouldn't affect you. You then proceeded to explain how you're actually of brown skin and gave us all the litany of percentages (new information from previous revelations from you, where you had just acknowledged lineage but NOT skin color or physical stature). My questions derived from the information you provide, which seems to be a new addition to suit each new discussion.

And as I explained earlier, your foolish ploy as to try to portray me as a racist only merits in your Dixie delusional mind. The chronology of the post clearly shows you rambling on about your racial make-up...of which I merely point out it makes your previous white supremacist leaning revisions of American history regarding civil rights, the Confederacy, slavery, etc., a bit psychotic. There is nothing LOGICAL about a person of your alleged physical make-up supporting a law that allows beat cops to just decide they don't consider your driver's ID "sufficient" during a roust that they determine "probable cause" for, and therefore can take you down town to sit in detention until you can produce a birth certificate or passport, etc.

In short, Dixie, you're just full of it...and like all little "intellectual" David Duke wanna-be's, you just make a fool of yourself with each vain attempt to defend your vile Dixie blatherings. Carry on.
Click to expand...

Actually, it was Post #158 where you DIRECTLY asked me about my race/ethnicity, which you later lied about and claimed you did not do in Post #170. Before that, you inferred that I couldn't possibly have valid judgment on this issue because my skin is not brown like that of a Mexican, to which I corrected you. In any event, you have illustrated your own criteria for judging people, and it's most certainly not in accordance with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s assertion that it should be based on "content of character."

And you can continue to lie and distort the facts about previous statements from me, comparing them with David Duke, who is a white supremacist. As I said before, it is highly illogical that I would have any such sentiments regarding "white supremacy" since I am probably less "white" than anything else. The closest I come to being "white" of European descent, is my Portuguese immigrant ancestors, they lived in the Rhine Valley of Germany, and fled into the Black Forrest to keep from being persecuted. These would be the original "Black Dutch" ...or where that ethnic distinction came from. They were actually mostly TRI-racial people, a mixture of Portuguese, German peasant, and African. With the exception of some Scotch-Irish (another peasant group), I have no other white European blood in me. So tell me, why would I support some idea of "white supremacy" again?
 
Threedee said:
The chronology of posts shows that there were a whopping 191 posts entered before this one. :cof1:
Click to expand...

Ahh, but did you actually read any of them? And if you did, did you comprehend what you read? And did you process the information in accordance to the order to which it was presented and to what was responded to?:cof1:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Actually, it was Post #136 were I pointed out that since YOU were not of brown skin, the new Arizona law proposals regarding immigration wouldn't affect you. You then proceeded to explain how you're actually of brown skin and gave us all the litany of percentages (new information from previous revelations from you, where you had just acknowledged lineage but NOT skin color or physical stature). My questions derived from the information you provide, which seems to be a new addition to suit each new discussion.

And as I explained earlier, your foolish ploy as to try to portray me as a racist only merits in your Dixie delusional mind. The chronology of the post clearly shows you rambling on about your racial make-up...of which I merely point out it makes your previous white supremacist leaning revisions of American history regarding civil rights, the Confederacy, slavery, etc., a bit psychotic. There is nothing LOGICAL about a person of your alleged physical make-up supporting a law that allows beat cops to just decide they don't consider your driver's ID "sufficient" during a roust that they determine "probable cause" for, and therefore can take you down town to sit in detention until you can produce a birth certificate or passport, etc.

In short, Dixie, you're just full of it...and like all little "intellectual" David Duke wanna-be's, you just make a fool of yourself with each vain attempt to defend your vile Dixie blatherings. Carry on.
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
Actually, it was Post #158 where you DIRECTLY asked me about my race/ethnicity, which you later lied about and claimed you did not do in Post #170. Before that, you inferred that I couldn't possibly have valid judgment on this issue because my skin is not brown like that of a Mexican, to which I corrected you. In any event, you have illustrated your own criteria for judging people, and it's most certainly not in accordance with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s assertion that it should be based on "content of character."

And for those who like to deal in reality instead of Dixie's little revisionist world, just go to post #154, and proceed from there. You'll get my point.

And you can continue to lie and distort the facts about previous statements from me, comparing them with David Duke, who is a white supremacist. As I said before, it is highly illogical that I would have any such sentiments regarding "white supremacy" since I am probably less "white" than anything else. The closest I come to being "white" of European descent, is my Portuguese immigrant ancestors, they lived in the Rhine Valley of Germany, and fled into the Black Forrest to keep from being persecuted. These would be the original "Black Dutch" ...or where that ethnic distinction came from. They were actually mostly TRI-racial people, a mixture of Portuguese, German peasant, and African. With the exception of some Scotch-Irish (another peasant group), I have no other white European blood in me. So tell me, why would I support some idea of "white supremacy" again?
Click to expand...

And once again folks, Dixie just ignores what he doesn't like (example being post #153). All one has to do is examine the chronology of the posts and you can see were I TWICE point out that Dixie must be mentally imbalanced if he endorses the Arizona policy that can target someone of his professed physical make up...because last time I checked, the whole Arizona hoop-la was about illegal Mexicans. If we are to believe Dixie (and his honesty/credibility on these boards is dubious at best), then he supports a policy were a beat cop can demand his driver's license AND birth certificate based on whatever "reasonable suspicion" the cop comes up with. If Dixie doesn't have all the goods, it's a trip to the local precinct detention cell. Only a person with a near psychotic need to be perceived as NOT one of "those people" would submit to such nonsense. As I provided proof previously, the Arizona proposed law is unconstitutional and does not "mirror" federal law. But in his self delusion, Dixie won't discuss details, he just repeats what he believes....which just doesn't cut it in a discussion based on facts and the logic derived from them.
 
I TWICE point out that Dixie must be mentally imbalanced if he endorses the Arizona policy that can target someone of his professed physical make up...because last time I checked, the whole Arizona hoop-la was about illegal Mexicans. If we are to believe Dixie (and his honesty/credibility on these boards is dubious at best), then he supports a policy were a beat cop can demand his driver's license AND birth certificate based on whatever "reasonable suspicion" the cop comes up with.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing Chicklet, if the AZ law did what you claim it does, I would be opposed to it, and anyone would be insane to not be opposed to it. BUT.... The law doesn't do as you indicate. In fact, the law is MORE demanding and restrictive of the AZ law enforcement official than the Federal law pertaining to federal agents. You are trying to propagate a LIE, a DISTORTION... you are MISLEADING people into believing something ABSURD! Your ONLY point of any valid contention is, the AZ law could potentially be misused by law enforcement, but the thing is... that apples to any and all laws! There is always the potential that a police officer is not going to properly enforce a law, or exercise their duties in accordance with the law. This exists with EVERY law, not just this one in Arizona. So the only valid and legitimate point you can make, and continue to make, is an absurd non-starter, which simply doesn't apply.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ahh, but did you actually read any of them? And if you did, did you comprehend what you read? And did you process the information in accordance to the order to which it was presented and to what was responded to?:cof1:
Click to expand...

No. I read the OP and first several responses and then I skimmed the rest.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahh, but did you actually read any of them? And if you did, did you comprehend what you read? And did you process the information in accordance to the order to which it was presented and to what was responded to?
Click to expand...

Threedee said:
No. I read the OP and first several responses and then I skimmed the rest.
Click to expand...

I applaud your honesty....and see little point in further discussion of this particular thread with you being that you admit your willful ignorance of what has transpired. Until next time.
 
I TWICE point out that Dixie must be mentally imbalanced if he endorses the Arizona policy that can target someone of his professed physical make up...because last time I checked, the whole Arizona hoop-la was about illegal Mexicans. If we are to believe Dixie (and his honesty/credibility on these boards is dubious at best), then he supports a policy were a beat cop can demand his driver's license AND birth certificate based on whatever "reasonable suspicion" the cop comes up with.
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
Here's the thing Chicklet, if the AZ law did what you claim it does, I would be opposed to it, and anyone would be insane to not be opposed to it. BUT.... The law doesn't do as you indicate. In fact, the law is MORE demanding and restrictive of the AZ law enforcement official than the Federal law pertaining to federal agents. You are trying to propagate a LIE, a DISTORTION... you are MISLEADING people into believing something ABSURD! Your ONLY point of any valid contention is, the AZ law could potentially be misused by law enforcement, but the thing is... that apples to any and all laws! There is always the potential that a police officer is not going to properly enforce a law, or exercise their duties in accordance with the law. This exists with EVERY law, not just this one in Arizona. So the only valid and legitimate point you can make, and continue to make, is an absurd non-starter, which simply doesn't apply.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing, you blithering Dixie dunce! Judge Bolton explains in no uncertain terms how wrong you are point for point. The Judge is referring to LEGAL PRECEDENT AND CURRENT LAW. All you are doing is just repeating ad nauseum your opinion and the usual BS that can be heard from every neocon pundit on the airwaves. Let me know when you actually grow a pair to discuss the CONTENT of the link I provide, because you sure as hell ran like a coward from Media Matters.

http://azdatapages.com/sb1070.html#annotation/a0
 
Dixie said:
Yes, the "chronology" of the posts show him getting his ass handed to him over and over again, then he returns with more nonsense and ignorance to have it handed to him repeatedly again.

I think he must be an alcoholic. The reason I say that, most drunks behave this way... they simply keep repeating something that sounds 'smart' to them, over and over, until it becomes annoying as hell to everyone around, this usually leads to drunken belligerence. I don't want to prejudge him, but that does appear to be the case, based on his rants. He gets good and tanked up, then comes here to be a shitfaced prick, which is markedly better than being a shitfaced prick out in public where you can get your ass kicked for real.
Click to expand...

Aww, what's the matter bunky? All flustered because the chronology of the posts shows you up for the lying PO-Dixie-S that you are?

In case you or the other dummies don't get it, "chronology" means the order in which each post appears time wise. And when one sees who said what and when, it can either make or break the latest assertion of a poster.

Which is why you and every other neocon parrot and self proclaime pseudo-intellectual get all bent out of shape when I use the phrase...because it is a constant reminder that you can't lie or BS your way out of an honest debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top