These Texans didn't support federal aid!

lk083017dAPR.jpg

none of this is happening. faux news bullshit. yay cajun navy
 
you really are a total dumbfuck, but whatever works for your idiocy

Still waiting for your first "if" that has ACTUALLY taken place, moron.

Your "shoulda, woulda, coulda" bullshit is the mantra of losers, pal. That's why you employ it. In logic, it's called Hypothesis Contrary to Fact. You concoct the premise and argue as if it were fact. Every time you invoke that lame tactic, you lose immediately.
 
Still waiting for your first "if" that has ACTUALLY taken place, moron.

Your "shoulda, woulda, coulda" bullshit is the mantra of losers, pal. That's why you employ it. In logic, it's called Hypothesis Contrary to Fact. You concoct the premise and argue as if it were fact. Every time you invoke that lame tactic, you lose immediately.

your bullshit word games is exactly that..........games. games for a loser like you who refuses to deal in reality. the reason it fails is you can't accept 'SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED' as exactly that, but you know you're wrong, so fuck off.
 
your bullshit word games is exactly that..........games. games for a loser like you who refuses to deal in reality. the reason it fails is you can't accept 'SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED' as exactly that, but you know you're wrong, so fuck off.

lol

The English language completely escapes you, illiterate fuck. But, when you shovel shit for a living, it doesn't matter.

When Madison drafted the Second, there was a conscientious objector clause in there. Know what that means, idiot?
 
wrong, NOBODY plans for 50+ inches of rain and IF someone did, you lib idiots would label them as paranoid.
.
They know the area is capable of these types of floods, even if it only happen rarely, the system was even overwhelmed by the Tax Day Flood.

The Libs appear to be the ones raising the red flag about it from what I have heard talking to my neighbors.
 
lol

The English language completely escapes you, illiterate fuck. But, when you shovel shit for a living, it doesn't matter.

When Madison drafted the Second, there was a conscientious objector clause in there. Know what that means, idiot?

its not in there now, is it? know what that means, retard?
 
Typical dishonest, right-wing goofball droolery.

That was not the only reason those Texas and other Repugnants voted against the bill. But leave it to you dishonest fucks to conveniently leave out the rest.



IOW, right-wingers have become such ideologues that their Representatives cannot work with or compromise with other members of Congress.

The ignorant, mule-headed, thick-skulled political right is making it impossible to govern this country.

The biggest factor influencing the Sandy vote, however, may have been the disappearance of bipartisan comity from the halls of Congress. The process may be denigrated as “logrolling,” but the idea that every legislator is going to need something from his or her colleagues at one point or another is ingrained in history. When a Mississippi flood displaced 600,000 residents of the Delta in 1927, for instance, Rep. Phil Swing personally led a congressional tour of the region. Swing represented California, 1,800 miles away, so what was he up to? Simple, he was preparing the ground for a flood control project for his home district, the Imperial Valley. He sponsored the Delta restoration bill and got his wish — congressional funding for what we know today as Hoover Dam. Both regions reaped decades of benefits.


Exactly what we said, even your post explains it....sadly you didn't understand what your own post was explaining to you.....

Aid for Mississippi flood victims certainly what nothing to do with flood control in California....this moron used the bill to
get gravy for his own state on the other side of the country....holding the Mississippi flood victims bill hostage.....
 
its not in there now, is it? know what that means, retard?

Yep. It means someone in the Senate tinkered with the original intent. But, of course, any idiot with any knowledge of the history of the Second would know that, wouldn't they? Sadly, that does exclude you
 
Yep. It means someone in the Senate tinkered with the original intent. But, of course, any idiot with any knowledge of the history of the Second would know that, wouldn't they? Sadly, that does exclude you

sadly, you display your complete ignorance of the Bill of Rights and it's creation, or the constitution for that matter. you claim to know more, but you really don't.
 
sadly, you display your complete ignorance of the Bill of Rights and it's creation, or the constitution for that matter. you claim to know more, but you really don't.

Look it up, prick. You won't, because you're too fucking lazy and don't have a 5th grader handy.

Still haven't taken your peashooter to the courthouse yet, have you coward? Afraid to find out your "shall not be infringed" claim is your own misinformed and ignorant bullshit.

Lol

Ignorant coward.

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2008/6/27/525635/-
 
Small is simply a matter of degree and opinion.

And? Government regardless of its size is a "necessary evil" according to the founders that created this republic. Again.....wanting to downsize the government does not equate with rescinding the entire government....just the superfluous wasteful bureaus that simply mirror already existing STATE AGENCIES that exist for only one reason, to usurp the power granted to the states by the US CONSTITUTION.
 
Back
Top