There Are 7.3 Million Job Openings, Not Enough Americans To Fill Them. We Need Immigr

Hello Vasquezrocks,

You should NOT call yourself " ThatOwlWoman " ....

You should call yourself .... " ThatLooneyBird " !

I've seen you go after several people here (as above) who have done nothing more than make good points. If you do that to me you better make it good because that will be the one and only time I will read a post like that of yours directed at me. I can tell you're intelligent and I'm always happy to discuss politics with anybody of any view, but it has to be a political discussion. As soon as it becomes an insult contest it is no longer primarily a political discussion. I have zero interest in that.

I know the insult thing is very popular here. And it is also allowed under the rules. I am here for just plain politics, and I understand that in order to filter out all of the (what I call garbage posts) I have to have a large Ignore list. I am not only OK with that, I actively maintain it, consider it a necessity. This yields a refined posting experience above the fray. I'll tell you why I like that. Because I come here to talk about politics. All of that insult stuff just eats up a lot of time and isn't really focusing on politics. By filtering all of that out, almost everything I read IS focused on politics. Thus, I learn more in less time. My discussions are on a higher level and produce better understanding of politics. I become better informed doing it this way than if I spent a portion of my time here mired in insults and flame wars.

We only have so much time we can devote to this place. We all have lives outside of JPP. I can get up to speed on as many issues as possible in the shortest amount of time. That leaves me more free time in my life for other things. That seems like a no-brainer to me. Who would NOT want more free time? Well, you're not getting any more than 24 hours in a day to do as you please, so the only way to get more free time is to reduce the time you spend doing things you are not interested in.

So it boils down to a clarification of interests. I am interested in politics. Some people seem to be interested in telling off other people with whom they disagree. Hey. If that's what people want to do that is their prerogative. The way I see it, time management is just as important to producing a quality life as money management.

And that leads me to let you know, if you care, that I will be unable to continue political discussions with you if you do to me what you have done to others. Nothing personal.

(btw - I used to be more into the personal attack thing long ago and in another forum. After I transcended above that I knew I would never go back.)
 
Hello leaningrightm,



Employers won't take 'em if they have a checkered history. Make a mistake once and you can never work a good job again. Would you hire an ex-con? Risk your business? How much expensive equipment do you not want stolen?

With that characterization and attitude toward someone who has made "a mistake once," it's obvious you've never did interviews or hired for a business.
That does seem to be the norm with companies who have a general "Human Resources" clown who knows little of the actual job requirements and bases
his/her recommendations off the answers to stupid questions from a booklet.
One screw up (non violent, non job related, etc.) shouldn't be a deterrent if the interviewee has the required experience for the job. There are many damn
good employees who have done something stupid in their younger days. I know a few.
 
Goodbye lisasanders1964,

The majority of welfare bludgers who refuse to get a job are American born and waving banners at trump's fucking rallies.

Now go get fucked you republicunt FAGGOT NIGGER NAZI CUNT .

OK, I've had enough. I don't usually place people on Ignore for flaming on somebody else but I don't really see much quality in your posts and I know I won't miss reading trash like the above. Welcome to my permanent Ignore List. Do try to have a nice life somehow. I don't want you in my life.

poof

Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Flame on me, mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you go on my PERMANENT Ignore List. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I won't participate in your threads, you will be banned from mine. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: if you like my PIP, feel free to use it. It works well. pss: My standards have nothing to do with being liberal or conservative. Both can be found on my Ignore list. It has to do with basic respect and decorum.
 
Good morning RB 60,

With that characterization and attitude toward someone who has made "a mistake once," it's obvious you've never did interviews or hired for a business.
That does seem to be the norm with companies who have a general "Human Resources" clown who knows little of the actual job requirements and bases
his/her recommendations off the answers to stupid questions from a booklet.
One screw up (non violent, non job related, etc.) shouldn't be a deterrent if the interviewee has the required experience for the job. There are many damn
good employees who have done something stupid in their younger days. I know a few.

It's so funny all the things you assume about me which simply are not true. Once again you have guessed incorrectly. I have interviewed / hired people, managed subordinates. I have also fired people. I know there are employers who will take a chance, give a chance. I also know there are plenty who will not. Just trying to be realistic here.

I have also noticed that you have a tendency to try to make a discussion ostensibly about academic issues somehow about the person you are discussing the concepts with. I didn't come here to talk about me. I came to talk about politics. Every time you try to make it about me I will resist that and gently try to swing the conversation back to politics. So you may as well just focus on the macro concepts if you want my view.
 
Last edited:
We have robots. They are the reason why American manufacturing productivity has continued to be strong, despite so many companies rushing off to open factories in other countries.

Periodically there are shortages in the field of nursing. Would you like a robot nurse? What if it doesn't put the thermometer the right orifice? lol

no that ignores the 600k NEW manufacturing jobs added by Trump's economy. ( they ain't robots).
Robotics are common world wide in manufacturing
 
Hello noise,

no that ignores the 600k NEW manufacturing jobs added by Trump's economy. ( they ain't robots).
Robotics are common world wide in manufacturing

That would be the Obama economy that Trump has somehow managed to not screw up - YET.
 
Good morning RB 60,



It's so funny all the things you assume about me which simply are not true. Once again you have guessed incorrectly. I have interviewed / hired people, managed subordinates. I have also fired people. I know there are employers who will take a chance, give a chance. I also know there are plenty who will not. Just trying to be realistic here.

I have also noticed that you have a tendency to try to make a discussion ostensibly about academic issues somehow about the person you are discussing the concepts with. I didn't come here to talk about me. I came to talk about politics. Every time you try to make it about me I will resist that and gently try to swing the conversation back to politics. So you may as well just focus on the macro concepts if you want my view.

Sorry I took this discussion so far off base, I didn't realize there were such strict rules and you were the authority. You do seem rather opinionated, aren't you here to discuss your opinions?
You may as well put me on ignore since your opinions override anyone who you don't agree with. And BTW, I highly doubt you've ever interviewed/hired anyone in a specific capacity.
 
Hello RB 60,

Sorry I took this discussion so far off base, I didn't realize there were such strict rules and you were the authority.

There are not 'such strict rules,' and I am not any authority. I am simply a poster with more specific personal standards than the site rules. I use the given tools to enhance and shape my own posting experience. I am exercising my freedom to create the posting experience I want.

You do seem rather opinionated, aren't you here to discuss your opinions?

I am very strongly opinionated, thank you. I consider that a compliment because I spend a lot of time researching and learning in order to form my opinions.

I am here to discuss politics, learn more about politics, and learn why others hold their own views. I know that, as a human, I am subject to making mistakes. I also know that I learn from my mistakes. If I get something incorrect and someone can point out why I am in error, then I want to correct that error and improve my view. Toward that end, I do like to share my views and hear different perspectives. If someone points out something I have overlooked or simply gotten wrong then I adjust my view and incorporate that new information. I will abandon a view if I learn it is incorrect. That's why I want to hear why people believe the things they do. If they have some approach I have not previously considered, and it makes sense to me, then I will adopt that and change my view. This process has brought me to my current view, and continually enhances my opinions.

You may as well put me on ignore since your opinions override anyone who you don't agree with.

That is not correct, so it is an invalid reason to place you on Ignore. I do not place people on Ignore for disagreeing with me. I place them on Ignore for being disrespectful. Without mutual respect there can be no rational discussion or good debate. I look forward to talking to people with whom I disagree. I look forward to talking to you. I would view it as a loss if I placed you on Ignore. My strict PIP sometimes causes me to make difficult decisions in order to uphold my personal standards. But I like the results of doing that and I know that life includes sometimes having to make difficult decisions. I hope I don't have to place you on Ignore. I would love it if I never even had to use the feature at all; but the problem with sites that have stringent rules is that they require time-consuming moderation and somebody would have to pay for that. So I self-moderate. I wish everyone would, but I know that's a pipe dream, not realistic.

I mostly talk to people with whom I disagree, in my visits here. It would be boring and of little use to come in here and only talk to people who share similar views. I learn more by talking to people of opposing views. I like hearing your unique views on politics. They help me rationalize why I hold my own views. Often, both of our views are quite rational, based on the facts we accept. Frequently it boils down to disputing the basic facts. I simply have no interest in making things personal when discussing national politics. I don't really see the relevance.

And BTW, I highly doubt you've ever interviewed/hired anyone in a specific capacity.

You are entitled to your view of course, but clearly you do not know me or my work history and I do, so I already know the solid information which you have no access to and are thus only guessing at. And the fact that you have shown you will trust a hunch over solid information undermines your views on other subjects, but that is your prerogative. If that is what helps you form your views then that makes me feel more confident in my own views when we differ because I try to base mine on what is known.
 
Hello Quetzalcoatl,

Or spend less. No money for Boomers or foriegn nations.

That won't work because if we spend less it hurts the economy.

Less government spending = lower GDP.

Boomers are responsible for a lot of economic activity and consumerism.

If that level is reduced then GDP goes down.

When GDP goes down it hurts our national credit rating and causes the Debt/GDP ratio to go up. We need to keep it as low as possible.

The Debt/GDP ratio represents the economic strength of our nation.
 
yeah. this is the republican open borders argument. its bullshit too. companies advertise more positions than actually exist, specifically to glut the labor market. the joads headed out west for these glorious fruit picking jobs, but when they get there, it turns out the pay is much much less, due to the glut of labor generated by the lies about labor. same shit here.
 
Back
Top