moon
Satire for Sanity
Perhaps you can put-in a call to Tel Aviv for Mossad to handle this.
Don't worry- neither will be allowed to fart without AIPAC's say-so. AIPAC, unfortunately, is equally self-indulgent and self-serving. Now fuck off.
The Trump University scandal graduates to the front pages
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Don't worry- neither will be allowed to fart without AIPAC's say-so. AIPAC, unfortunately, is equally self-indulgent and self-serving. Now fuck off.
Trump U probably has closer to 0%.
the story does have some people saying it helped them and there are not a lot of people involved in the lawsuits. If it were closer to 0 there would be more plaintiffs
I bet if they audited the foundation of the candidate you are helping elect (clinton foundation) they would find a lot more irregularities
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I guess the bolded is all we need to know. You don't care if the POTUS is a grifter.
As for Clinton, I've been plenty critical of her on this board. But her offenses simply don't rise to the level of Trump's. Hillary is an expedient politician, and dishonest. But she's a pretty run-of-the-mill phony politician, and doesn't really represent what I'd consider a danger to the country if elected. It will just be status quo.
Trump if off on so many levels. The guy is deranged, and the consummate con man. He doesn't even have a basic grasp of some issues, nor do I think he cares. He's textbook narcissistic.
Hillary engages in a lot of the same dishonesty & double-speak as Trump, but it's just a different level. With her, it's something she does. With him, it's who he is.
like we mentioned in any educational program some people will get something out of it and some wont. Not even harvard and yale get 100% of their graduates successful.
If you consider the number of people in the lawsuit it seems only a tiny minority of people were dissatisfied with trump u.
In other words, her con man stuff doesn't really bother me so much because she is a Democrat.
LOL, what the heck is the difference between something she does and who she is? He is not a murderer, it is just what he does.
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Pretty lazy comment. I don't care about Democrat/Republican. There were about 3-4 Republicans in the field who I would have voted for, and I'm not voting for Hillary regardless.
Trump IS a con man. I wouldn't classify Hillary that way. She's not honest, but she's not a grifter, either.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Did Trump hand-pick the instructors for Trump U.?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Did he?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
He did not.
She does the same things as Trump, but it isn't who she is.
Funniest shit ever. She is not a liar, it is just what she does. Lol
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
It's not that nuanced, but you're pretty dopey, so there's that.
It's pretty simple: she's dishonest, like a lot of politicians. Trump is a con man, and lies much more strategically toward that end.
To try to portray that as being "exactly the same," or to pretend that this is what I'm saying, is just dopey. But you're pretty dopey.
But but it is not who she is, she just does it.
You can't even see how stupid you sound.
Is the green river serial killer a serial murderer or is it just what he did and he really isn't a murderer?
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Strawman.
I assume you understand the difference between someone who lies, and a pathological liar?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
It's as simple as this, dopey: all politicians lie. Every one.
Trump lies pathologically, and is a con man to boot. To try to shrug that off with a, "well, heck, they ALL lie," as though it's all apples-to-apples, is either Trump apologism, denial or just dopinesss.
Trump lies pathologically, and is a con man to boot. To try to shrug that off with a, "well, heck, they ALL lie," as though it's all apples-to-apples, is either Trump apologism, denial or just dopinesss.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Didn't he?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Hmmmm...didn't understand the answer the 1st time?
A little early in the day for a bender, USF.
Now you're moving the goal posts. And nothing I said is a strawman.
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Nope. No goalpost move. What I just posted is what I 1st posted - just with more clinical definitions. Glad that you finally get the difference.
You said she does the same things, now you're playing semantics by claiming he lies more, so that means he is a liar and she isn't, oh wait, now he is a pathological liar, she isn't that, but it is what she does. He is a con man, but when she does the same things, she is not a con, she just happens to con, it is just what she does, not who she is.
You're silly. Your hard on for Trump has clouded your thinking.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
You're putting words in my mouth.
Unless you can find where I said that Hillary is a con?
Like I said, I was pretty clear in the 1st post; you just decided to try to make hay out of it. She lies; Trump is a pathological liar. Lying is something she does; lying is who he is. Same thing.
I can't help it if you have a hard time w/ the language. As for Trump, he's a deplorable human being. I'll make no apologies for my opposition to him, or for continuing to post negatively about him. He's a dangerous candidate.